Sick Society sexualizes a ten year old girl

reply to post by Patrioitinsheepclothing


Your rambling nonsense pal.. is it pornography when an adult model does her job. Modeling? So you saying that modeling is sexual pornography?

Anyone that looks at these photo's and see's them as sexual must be pedophiles themselves.

Sorry, I don't see anything sexual about a 10 year old glammed up like a model.

Sicko's... get your heads checked before you go and have kids

I agree with some of the posters above there is nothing sexual about this to me. Yes she is dolled up to look like a model but shes fully clothed and is not in any sexual poses therefore this is not child pornography. The same thing happend with abercrombie and fitch back in like 2005 and people complained that the children in the catalogue looked too adult. I remember because my high school theology teacher would not shut up about it. Meh. Get over it.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by Nomad451

I thought this is where you were headed. If the "viewer" sees something sinister, then it is all in the "viewers" mind.
The only problem with that is, nature does not work that way. Look around, girls dress provocatively for a reason. Sex sells. Nuns wear full body armor for a reason.
This is a child, dude, not an adult model.
...and to think we speak the same language.

reply to post by acmpnsfal

Abber and Fitch.
We have progressed to 10 year olds. I wonder if your teach predicted it would come to this?
Or, you weren't listening?
.

reply to post by SirClem


I guess there is something wrong with me because these pictures did not titilate me nearly as much as they seemed to for others. I see a little girl with too much makeup and a dress that is probably a little too mature for her but nothing about it excited me in any sexual fashion. Gotta wonder about the people that see a little girl in makeup and immediately think about sex. I guess taking daughters to the beach in a bathing suit or letting them wear makeup on Halloween is a really exciting time for some.

Originally posted by SirClem
reply to post by Nomad451

 

This is exploitation.
If you don't see that, then the rest of what I say will be meaningless to you.
Exploitation does not require that YOU get anything out of it. It is the CHILD that is exploited, not YOU.
The harm is to the child, and to our sensibilities. If you don't care about our sensibilities, and you think that the child is not harmed, then YOU are a part of the society that thinks this is okay.
I don't think that you should be prosecuted. I just think it is sick.
That is all.

Dude, I'm not saying this isn't exploitation. That may be the case!

But is it sexual exploitation? No, sorry I don't see that this has anything to do with sex. Therefore this is not kiddie porn and the article is a load of BS

give me a break! you think paedofiles buy vogue? you think vogue are catering to paedofiles?
i agree those pics are a little of the mark and a bit creepy, but come on.

Originally posted by Thurisaz
reply to post by SirClem

 

I am too upset to make a comment but I want to...

S & F for the OP

Here, maybe this will calm you down.



Oh no! I hear cops at my door.





Dancing around in their underwear obviously to cater to the pedophile crowd.

reply to post by Nomad451


Guess you dont understand what being an adult is and making adult desisions, Its part of being an adult model, you really shouldnt point out who should and shouldnt have children.

Reply to post by SirClem

The children in the catalouge were about her age thats why he made a big deal about it. But I was inclined not to listen to him because he was an ex porn addict and would lecture us for hours about respecting women etc etc. He had a lot of personal problems which killed his credibility for me.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by Kitilani

The point is not whether YOU were aroused or titillated. That is not how you define exploitation.
At the risk of sounding like an old person, it doesn't stop here. Just wait, the boys are next. It's coming.
Copy and paste my comments. If they will exploit kids, they will stop at nothing to make a profit.

reply to post by Patrioitinsheepclothing


I don't care.

Explain to me in detail how this miniature model's photo shoot is child pornography of a sexual nature.

Thats all I want to know.. so go ahead and explain it

reply to post by Kitilani


nice one..

That is one funny commercial

Well I'm off to work I'll be looking forward to coming home and reading all the trollop this thread will have created!

have fun pedo's

I think what's more perverse about this is a child acting too "adult". She should be out riding her bike, swinging under an old tree, playing a pretend game with her friends.... not being all dolled up, and acting "mature" and adult like by modelling.
Children need their childhood, and it seems to me there are less and less children having a real childhood.

Originally posted by Patrioitinsheepclothing
reply to post by Nomad451

 

Guess you dont understand what being an adult is and making adult desisions, Its part of being an adult model, you really shouldnt point out who should and shouldnt have children.

I hate to assume but I just have to assume this girl has some type of parent or guardian unless they went back to the days when studios could own orphans. Please correct me if I am wrong. Do you think this little girl's parents had any say or are you gearing up to go take her from them now?

ATS is funny. The first lady suggests you tell your kids to get off the couch and move around a bit and it is fascist nanny state government telling us how to parent.
Some little girl puts on some makeup and a gold dress and suddenly everyone on ATS should parent this little girl because her parents are not doing the job some ATSers wish they were.

Originally posted by Kitilani
reply to post by SirClem

 

I guess there is something wrong with me

well...you said it.

Honey! Quick! Hide the family albums! The Moral Majority are here and they are pissed!

Come on.

Originally posted by Thurisaz

Originally posted by Kitilani
reply to post by SirClem

 

I guess there is something wrong with me

well...you said it.

Yes I did. I also said it did not turn me on or come across in a sexual manner to me in any way shape or form.

I SAID THAT TOO!

reply to post by neonitus

What an innocent doll your avatar is.

But then, your avatar IS just a rendering. How about a photo of you at ten years old? Pretty plain I bet...playing outside, celebrating a birthday party, school picture?

Like it should be.

Now, let's put you into something a bit more sexy, shall we daughter?