It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sick Society sexualizes a ten year old girl

page: 17
15
<< 14  15  16    18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 10:30 AM
link   
How far away is this from the original topic?
Lingerie babies
I say, not too far, and that is the problem. These promoters of filth just need to be shunned. Bad example to say the least.




posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


I understood you just fine and I answered you specifically. It sets a dangerous trend. You will see more young girls doing the same thing.
edit on 18-8-2011 by aero56 because: info



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by aero56
 





It sets a disturbing trend. Young females "pornifying" themselves.


por·nog·ra·phy/pôrˈnägrəfē/
Noun: Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.

The little girls here are not displaying anything pornographic

the thread itself is useless



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Anonymous Van
 


anonymous; adjective; lacking individuality, unique character, or distinction. Guess we both know how to use the dictionary.
edit on 18-8-2011 by aero56 because: info



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 04:15 PM
link   
reply to post by aero56
 


i agree, but its not really related to the thread hun, so, instead , why dont you try to stick to the subject ?



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousVan
 

Apparently, you think the thread is useless, so why are you here?
Have you contributed anything?



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 06:14 PM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 


yes, i want to point my opinion, i disagree with your point of view and opinion,i have the right to do so.

Im sorry but i dont see anything even slightly pornographic in the pictures , maybe its time for you to check yourself , considering its pornographic, for you, you must have a twistted mind .

So, yes, i contribute to the thread, stating how obvious the thread is useless, pointing something as pornographic when its clearly not , as you did.

You have a problem with it ?

edit on 18-8-2011 by AnonymousVan because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-8-2011 by AnonymousVan because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 06:21 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousVan
 

No problem at all.
Of course I disagree, but you know that.
No need for a pissing match, just try to contribute to a thread without making it personal.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:09 PM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 

i still dont understand where you people see pornography , seriously...i dont see anything pornographic about those kids.



posted on Aug, 18 2011 @ 09:23 PM
link   
.

edit on 18-8-2011 by neonitus because: oops wrong thread.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by AnonymousVan
 

The title uses the word "sexualizes", and I believe the photos do just that.
If this were an adult, I would have no problem with the photos, but it is a child. An exploited child.
If not porn, it is like porn in that the photos are "utterly lacking in redeeming social importance" in promoting suggestive images of a scantily clad child.
That is my view. Thanks for posting.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by SirClem
The title uses the word "sexualizes", and I believe the photos do just that.
If this were an adult, I would have no problem with the photos, but it is a child. An exploited child.


I dont even get where you jump into the whole exploited stuff. Fashion, photography and modelling is an art form. Would you have a problem with a child who picks up painting? Also you say you wouldn't have a problem if this was an adult? So you admid that it is infact the child itself that is 'bothering' you?



If not porn, it is like porn in that the photos are "utterly lacking in redeeming social importance" in promoting suggestive images of a scantily clad child.
That is my view. Thanks for posting.


So what part of art dont you understand? We dont do that because we think it's going to cure cancer or stop all the global warming hoohaa. We do it to be creative. That is the biggest social importance there is imo. Also if you see something suggestive in the photos then it's your mind jumping into conclusions. Yes fashion can be sexy but this is so far from it I don't even know how to descripe it.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 10:36 PM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 

How could you NOT get into the "whole exploited" stuff?
Do you know the definition of exploited? Is this girl promoting herself in this way? If she is not, she is being exploited.
These are not simple photos of a child. Some of you are really pathetic. This is all done for money.
Get a damn grip.
At least offer a reasonable argument why you think that nothing is wrong with it if you can, but really you can't. It is indefensible to use a child to make money in this way.
But, if the kid was picking fruit and actually working, some of you would be all over the exploitation of a child. Ass backwards.



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 11:42 PM
link   
How do you recon she doesn't want to do this? Do you know her? You're making assumptions. News flash for you: Children do all kinds of modelling, acting etc. by the millions. So are they all being exploited? Are you making assumptions and claiming that the parents and all the people who are involved with this shoot are guilty of criminal abuse? Especially the photographer who wouldn't have to put up with a difficult model because she doesn't want to do it since he can just pick up the phone and have hundred girls lined up who want to do the shoot. Where's your evidence?
You're the one who needs to get a grip. If anyones mind wonders into sex when seeing pictures of beatiful preteen girls there is a problem. And the problem isnt because the girls are pretty.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 

God, NOT this again.

"If you're disturbed by the idea of children being turned into whores, then YOU'RE the one who's demented. So shut your damned mouth and stay out of our way."

WOW!!! BRILLIANT!!!!! That sounds absolutely ridiculous, but.......WOW!

And may I remind you that you're the one speaking of "beautiful preteens." Now just who are the ones with the problem again.....?



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 12:30 AM
link   
reply to post by gentledissident
 

Now not to come off as overly confrontational, but I really would appreciate it if you addressed my earlier post directed at you. I mean, just what the hell were you trying to say? Did I just take you out of context? I hope so......



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bleak
reply to post by gentledissident
 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it almost seems as if you're implying that pedophilia is somehow normal.

Sorry, I didn't see this before. I had to look up pedophilia and I'm still confused about it's definition. I'm saying that we are animals, and we are all attracted to each other. You know, it's like everyone being attracted to Captain Jack Harkness. Maybe some humans repress attraction, but I feel that it's still there.

Humans repress a LOT because they feel like they're supposed to. Repression seems to be a big cause of neurotic behavior. Just sayin.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 01:55 AM
link   
reply to post by gentledissident
 

I know that people are naturally attracted to each other. I mean......duh.
But that still doesn't answer my question at all. You see, in case you didn't know, there are "natural" attractions.......and there are unnatural attractions.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 01:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bleak
reply to post by gentledissident
 

I know that people are naturally attracted to each other. I mean......duh.
But that still doesn't answer my question at all. You see, in case you didn't know, there are "natural" attractions.......and there are unnatural attractions.
What? How do you define "unnatural"? Everything is natural since we are nature.



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 02:01 AM
link   
10 is bad, under 10 is worse.

What about the American mothers who put their tiny girls in sexy outfits and teach them totally inappropriate moves?

This is child abuse.

Apparently one of these abusive American mothers is trying to introduce this here in NZ.

GO AWAY, and WAKE UP TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING TO YOUR DAUGHTER!



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 14  15  16    18 >>

log in

join