It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sick Society sexualizes a ten year old girl

page: 15
15
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 07:35 PM
link   
reply to post by nuttin4U
 

Sounds like you have a weird friend. Or "facebook" friend, I mean this person knows you have daughters.
I guess it is an example of our sick society, perhaps better than mine...that is really sick. My example is just really sad.



edit on 9-8-2011 by SirClem because: Shpellin




posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 08:23 PM
link   
The state of classless "art"




Soft porn? Anyone?



posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 08:48 PM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 


Yeah, uh... since when are nude statues porn? Are you trying to tell me that the statue of David (or numerous other classic sculptures) are porn? What does that even have to do with this thread?
edit on 9-8-2011 by Nosred because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 09:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Nosred
 

It doesn't have much to do with this thread, but another poster posted some art in defense of art, and I never attacked art.
So, is this "art"? Or not?
I don't thinks so, but that is my opinion. I guess you think it is art. Since I don't think so, I am not attacking "art", but perhaps I am attacking a classless society.



posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Maslo
 



So why do you have this quote in your signature?





"That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community against his will is to prevent harm to others. Over himself over his own body and mind the individual is sovereign." -John Stuart Mill


You are simplifying a non-simple issue.




I believe you are a tool. Do you support child abuse, or what?


Yes. I beat kids daily.
edit on 8/9/2011 by dalan. because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2011 @ 11:29 PM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 


Are you actually claiming that fashion photography is not art? Also btw, porn can be art too. Those two are not mutually exclusive.



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 




You are simplifying a non-simple issue.


Whats not simple about it? Is child abuse harming others? Yes (the children). Then the state should step in, as it is with murder or any other crime with actual victim. In fact, knowing about child abuse and not reporting it should be a crime.
I am not implying that the girl in the OPs post is abused, thats certainly not the case, but I see nothing wrong with reporting real child abuse. Thats because I agree with your sig quote.



Yes. I beat kids daily.


Yeah, that seems to be the only logical conclusion why would someone deem reporting child abuse as a bad thing..



edit on 10/8/11 by Maslo because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 06:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


I'll say it again, remember JonBenet Ramsey? You sexualize a little girl, and she may end up dead.
edit on 10-8-2011 by aero56 because: typo



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 07:10 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 

Why do you try to broaden the scope of my statements, into areas that are clearly not intended?
As for some porn being art, can you post it here? I doubt it, but why shouldn't you be able to if it is art? Why do you suppose ATS has that policy?



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 10:51 AM
link   
reply to post by aero56
 


I´m still waiting for your answer to the question about why the male teachers were distracted by the developed 10 year old girls in tight clothing.

Thank you.



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 




So, is this "art"? Or not? I don't thinks so, but that is my opinion. I guess you think it is art. Since I don't think so, I am not attacking "art", but perhaps I am attacking a classless society.


That seems pretty straight forward to me. Also are you claiming that something that is X-rated cannot be art? X-rated stuff is forbidden on the T&C. It doesn't say "You cannot post X-rated material unless it is artfull."



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 11:27 AM
link   
OnT:

The problem isnt the photos or sessions of photos...

The problem is the market.

There is obviously a market for this kind of
photos/pictures/art..And That is the problem.

As someone else said early in the thread.
LET THE KIDS BE KIDS FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE...

Theyll have problems of another kind when they grow up.
Giving them the comlpex and strive for beauty to early will
just mess up their heads.



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by Kitilani
 


I'll say it again, remember JonBenet Ramsey? You sexualize a little girl, and she may end up dead.
edit on 10-8-2011 by aero56 because: typo

Say it a couple more times.
I never sexualized her.
I never killed her.
So I have no idea why you said it either time.



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Women increasingly "pornified".

New Study by Erin Hatton and Mary Nell Trautner concludes women have been increasing sexualized over the last several decades, AND it is very harmful.
Fitting.

Abstract A number of journalists and scholars have pointed to the sexual objectification of women and men in popular media to argue that Western culture has become “sexualized” or even “pornified.” Yet it is not clear whether men or women have become more frequently—or more intensely sexualized—over time. In a longitudinal content analysis of images of women and men on more than four decades of Rolling Stone magazine covers (1967–2009), we begin to answer such questions. Using a unique analytical framework that allows us to measure both the frequency and intensity of sexualization, we find that sexualized images of men and women have increased, though women continue to be more frequently sexualized than men. Yet our most striking finding is the change in how women—but not men—are sexualized. Women are increasingly likely to be “hypersexualized,” but men are not. These findings not only document changes in the sexualization of men and women in popular culture over time, they also point to a narrowing of the culturally acceptable ways for “doing” femininity as presented in popular media.



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 10:54 PM
link   


Just look at how this young man is moving his hips, this is far too sexual to be shown on television. He'll corrupt the youth I say!



posted on Aug, 10 2011 @ 11:44 PM
link   
This is disgusting our poor little girls are being turned into harlots. The last 50 years have been a complete disaster. For all the 'progress' of social liberalism all we have to show for it is interracial crime, broken families, broken homes, adultery on a massive scale, 10 year old white girls being turned into prostitutes by Arab gangs in the UK etc.



posted on Aug, 11 2011 @ 01:49 AM
link   
The irony is how adamant politicians get about bringing in restrictive laws, to supposedly fight paedophilia.

They don't give a damn about stopping paedophilia; they WANT it, for the precise reason that they can use it to emotionally manipulate parents into supporting draconian laws, under the pretext of fighting it.

That's why material like this is allowed. They actually want to stimulate and incite paedophiles, so there will be more child abuse cases, so parents will scream for something to be done...and then they get to take more freedom away, and get more political power themselves, in the name of fighting paedophilia.



posted on Aug, 11 2011 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainInstaban
 


You are still hung up on that? Wow. That is interesting.



posted on Aug, 11 2011 @ 02:15 PM
link   
reply to post by SirClem
 


And not many seem to want to respond to that. Why? Because it is true, and those who think otherwise don't want to face up to it. It's getting worse in our culture every single day.



posted on Aug, 11 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by CaptainInstaban
 


You are still hung up on that? Wow. That is interesting.


It is interesting indeed.

A simple answer would suffice. I don´t know exactly what you are trying to imply, but it comes across as a bit desperate.

Your answer is relevant to this thread, because, judging from your own words, you had a good example of how the problem lies particularly in the mind the beholder, and not with the picture.

I also asked you to explain in what other way I should interprete your post.

Shouldn´t be that hard to do, if what I was saying was that silly.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join