It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
Your right about that. Still doesnt mean this will be implemented in the future. Theres no reason for this. No reason for Genocide or anything like that. I think some people have a totally wrong idea of the NWO.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
True but for a New World Order the whole Planet would need to Unite and we have Russia and North Korea itching to Nuke us and China itching to invade us. I dont think we are ready for such a thing as a New World Order.
Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakeable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
Acting to give a false illusion of nearly going to War? Sounds pretty preposterous to me. To unite we would have to all have to have a mind state to match each other Human Beings and we havent Socially Evolved to that yet and im sure if the Republicans and Democrats cant agree on anything the US and Foreign Countries wont either.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
And other than a few minor coincidences and interpretations where is the substantial Evidence this will happen? The main point of this thread was or me to ask if there was any substantial evidence to back up these claims. I see all the coincidences and i know they Government has its secrets but where is the SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. I mean retired Government Officials admitting to this, Government Files on World Domination, where is it?
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
I'll watch this and get back to this thread. If this doesnt have any relevent Evidence of upcoming Genocide or World Domination i will deem this as fiction.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by patternfinder
Dude i dont think your crazy i think your crazy i think you just the meaning of the New World Order. Im 18 minutes through this and my conclusion I dont think its a group its more of a movement because all the mentions of a NWO have mentioned the changing of the Earth and this symbolizes changes that we make on the Earth, no Genocide or anything like that. Just because Hitler did this doesnt mean this will happen again.
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by thruthseek3r
Ive done research and came to the conclusion the rest of the World has....NWO is just the World transforming and every Nation uniting but when people misinterpret this and suggest Genocide and things like that will happen with no proof i tend to not believe this.
I'd like to see a quote.
Strong on national sovereignty at the opening session of the 1992 Earth Summit...
"The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security." -Maurice Strong at the 1992 Earth Summit. www.nationalcenter.org...
Our Global Neighborhood
Report of the Commission on Global Governance
(ISBN 0-19-827998-1; Published by Oxford University Press, 1995)
A Summary Analysis
The Commission on Global Governance has released its recommendations in preparation for a World Conference on Global Governance, scheduled for 1998, at which official world governance treaties are expected to be adopted for implementation by the year 2000. Among those recommendations are specific proposals to expand the authority of the United Nations to provide:
* Global taxation;
* A standing UN army;
* An Economic Security Council;
* UN authority over the global commons;
* An end to the veto power of permanent members of the Security Council;
* A new parliamentary body of "civil society" representatives (NGOs);
* A new "Petitions Council";
* A new Court of Criminal Justice; (Accomplished in July, 1998 in Rome)
* Binding verdicts of the International Court of Justice;
* Expanded authority for the Secretary General.
...."Next to life, liberty is what people value most," the report says. It also says: "The impulse to possess turf is a powerful one for all species; yet it is one that people must overcome." It also says: "global rules of custom constrain the freedom of sovereign states," and "sensitivity over the relationship between international responsibility and national sovereignty [is a] considerable obstacle to the leadership at the international level,"/ and "Although states are sovereign, they are not free individually to do whatever they want." /.... sovereignty.net...
...the very incarnation of an international organization of integration in which Member States have agreed to relinquish sovereignty in order to strengthen the coherence and effectiveness of their actions.
...If there is one place on earth where new forms of global governance have been tested since the Second World War, it is in Europe. European integration is the most ambitious supranational governance experience ever undertaken. It is the story of interdependence desired, defined, and organized by the Member States. In no respect is the work complete—neither geographically nor in terms of depth (i.e., the powers conferred by the Member States to the E.U.), nor, obviously, in terms of identity....
Our challenge today is to establish a system of global governance that provides a better balance between leadership, effectiveness, and legitimacy on the one hand, and coherence on the other...
This report analyzes the gap between current international governance institutions, organizations and norms and the demands for global governance likely to be posed by long-term strategic challenges over the next 15 years. The report is the product of research and analysis by the NIC and EUISS following a series of international dialogues co-organized by the Atlantic Council, TPN, and other partner organizations in Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, New Delhi, Pretoria, Sao Paulo & Brasilia, Moscow, and Paris. ....
Global Governance 2025: at a critical juncture
Global governance – the collective management of common problems at the international level – is at a critical juncture. Although global governance institutions have racked up many successes since they were developed after the Second World War, the growing number of issues on the international agenda, and their complexity, is outpacing the ability of international organisations and national governments to cope....
Three effects of rapid globalisation are driving demands for more effective global governance....
The shift to a multipolar world is complicating the prospects for effective global governance over the next 10 years. The expanding economic clout of emerging powers increases their political influence well beyond their borders. Power is not only shifting from established powers to rising countries and, to some extent, the developing world, but also towards non-state actors. Diverse perspectives on and suspicions about global governance, which is seen as a Western concept, will add to the difficulties of effectively mastering the growing number of challenges.