posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 04:15 PM
Originally posted by digitalf
I watched the video and can't really see what there is to debunk. If the cure is so unlawful why did the US Government represented via the
Department of Health and Human Services and then modified to the Department of Health try to patent it on a number of occasions ?
Search them out online at patft.uspto.gov...
478264, 2605930 & 5883124 to name a few.
Burzynski's own formula of antineoplaston as2-1 and antineoplaston AS2-5 has a valid place in modern medicine - greed wins the day yet again and it
is pure evil.
p.s I think it's clear to see Samid; Dvorit (Rockville, MD) was not the inventor (as suggested in these patents).
edit : Google's patent search is much easier to use - patents.google.com...
edit on 5-8-2011 by digitalf because: (no reason
IMO They stole his idea and did not even steal it in its entirety, so when they do test it they will get no results and this will be more ammunition
for them to push this therapy under even more - that's how they work.
Also as if by magic the cost of clinical trials has become so enormous, only big corporations can really fund the giant studies to show something as
effective and this also makes replication impossible for the poor man.
It's what is wrong with the world - greed.
If you look at the giant debate behind vitamin c and cancer you can see how faulty science and the venemous hate that people have against change
pushes science back by a long time
For a run down of why and how this happens read World Without Cancer by Ed Griffin.
All the bickering about politics is BS in this thread no one seems to want to address the real points that he
"cured" 11 out of 40 ish people. (I posted a link to the research) Current mainstream evidence shows no such cure possible in convention drugs with
that type of cancer.
It would be ridiculous to explain this as selection bias etc. when the NCI admitted that these responses are real.
It's easier to ad hominem character assasinate him countless suits against him.