It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But I don't miss the times where you said I was taught false doctrine. You admit that you don't have perfect knowledge, but you are able to say someone else has false doctrine.
If I worried about consensus, I would not be an atheist. Everyone I know is christian. If you don't know what the truth is, how do you live by it?
Ok then, you can be saved then continue to live in your sin? So pretty much there's no difference between christians and sinners except christians have the heart of Jesus? Is that what you're saying or do I have you wrong on that?
What I was getting at was you mentioned that god says we should be hot or cold, not lukewarm. We shouldn't sit on the fence, as you say. We should believe in something instead of remaining neutral. What do you do if you don't know what to believe?
I'm not asking to be a god. I'm just asking for truth, and if this god is real and wants to get to know me, and loves me unconditionally, I'm fine with that.
It is easy to see that the world doesn't rest on the back of a giant turtle. We can use our senses and technology to see that. Now, when dealing with ancient texts and beliefs in gods in which you can't see, that's different. You interpret scripture in ways that make sense to you, others interpret things differently, and others interpret it different from those people.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Yes and that is how we find the truth, by eliminating the wrong answers first.
When will you apologize for misquoting me and putting words in my mouth? You still haven't done it for some reason. I didn't say that I can not believe any of them. I said, how will I know which one is true, if any, as there are so many beliefs...and each person believes there's to be true? If someone has a good reason and evidence, which is also open to discussion as to what qualifies for that, as to what they believe is true, then it might be easier to believe.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Yet, you have repeatedly said that there are all these different beliefs and therefore you cannot believe any of them, that is what I meant by consensus.
I have seen many of these and they vary. I have asked kinglizard questions about his in which he states he didn't know if he had a body or not. I asked him how he could not know, all you have to do is look. And if you can look, that must mean you have eyes. If you have eyes, then maybe you have a head that your eyes sit in. If you have a head, then maybe there's a neck that it sits on, etc. How could you not know? Sounds more like a dream to me, where you hardly ever see your body.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Someone has just begun a thread on NDEs, within it he discusses how much people who have had them are in agreement, that is when you get your consensus.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Paul answered that and his answer is pretty good. Start with Romans 3:31, then Romans 6:2 and Romans 6:15. I really don't like quoting chapter and verse as a rule; but, because you were raised legalistically I provide them, not a complaint an explanation for why I give chapter and verse.
I know that fire is hot from experience. I don't have to examine it. Depending on how much fire is there, I may be able to put it out. If there's too much, I get out. So, if I see a small fire, I don't leave the building because experience tells me I can put it out and maybe save the building from being destroyed.
Originally posted by AQuestion
When there is a fire in a building you don't wait to examine it, measure it and verify that it is hot, you leave the building. Only you will know when you have enough information to decide either way; but, if you wait until you have perfect knowledge then you will have to wait until you are perfect and that never happens here on earth. As far as hot and cold, that is not about not knowing it is about knowing enough to make a decision and refusing to.
I do not accept him because I have not heard from him. I don't even know if he's real. If I said that Santa wanted a relationship with you, you just have to accept him as who he is. You'd want evidence that Santa is real, wouldn't you? Sorry about the Santa analogy again, I guess I could use Allah.
Originally posted by AQuestion
I have to correct what you said, he already knows you, he accepted you as you are. You do not know him because you do not accept him as who he is and he is good with letting you choose.
Really, how? If you choose to require proof that Santa is real, does that mean you choose to be Santa, or Allah? I don't get what you mean by that.
Originally posted by AQuestion
When we choose to be the one who requires proof we choose to be God.
I have heard believers on these boards say the same thing, and I think it's silly. One of them even reads the bible in the Hebrew language.
Originally posted by AQuestion
This is perverted by some who take a phrase by Jesus where he tells the Pharisees or the Saducees (I don't remember which and it really doesn't matter and I don't care to look it up) that they say that they are little gods and they are. There are pastors who claim that this means that we can become gods; but, they do not understand what it means.
I am aware of many sentient people.
Originally posted by AQuestion
If one is the only sentience that one is aware of then we have become like God, all alone until we create new people and he was better at creating people than I care to try.
I have.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Perhaps you should have this conversation with a fundamentalist who reads the bible as you do.
You said that you don't know for certain that your beliefs are 100% true. That tells me that you know that you could be wrong about things. That tells me that you could have a false doctrine and not them, but I imagine you don't see it that way. It's easy for me to see it that way, as I am on the outside looking in.
Originally posted by AQuestion
I do not agree with them or their interpretation any more than I agree with yours.
It is ok if you can't offer an apology for your wrong doing. Pride is tough sometimes. I do apologize however if I have misquoted you or put words in your mouth you did not say. I don't want to do that, I want to understand what you're saying and where you're coming from. But, I think I'm getting to know you pretty good now and what you're going to say is that you didn't ask for an apology and do not accept mine.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Like your search for God, your search for an apology is not going to get what you seek. In both cases you seek to set the rules and it doesn't work that way as you offer nothing back.
Could they kill each other? If so, what does a spirit become when it dies?
Originally posted by ren1999
Spirits are tangible to each other in the other world.
But they don't fight to kill each other. They fight mentally to influence the living world.
Why do you call it "god"?
Originally posted by ren1999
I suppose that it is a common belief that God is omniscient (all knowing).
I don't believe that.
It is ok if you can't offer an apology for your wrong doing. Pride is tough sometimes. I do apologize however if I have misquoted you or put words in your mouth you did not say. I don't want to do that, I want to understand what you're saying and where you're coming from. But, I think I'm getting to know you pretty good now and what you're going to say is that you didn't ask for an apology and do not accept mine.
Ok, sounds fair.
Originally posted by AQuestion
I am happy to apologize if you believe I have misunderstood you or your reasons and you actually managed to misunderstand again. I said you would not get an apology under your rules, demanding one.
Sounds reasonable.
Originally posted by AQuestion
I did indeed not ask for an apology, I don't as a rule; but, I do accept them if freely given, that is how I approach them and give them. It is as I have said, how i view developing a good relationship be it with God or another, nothing by requirement, freely given.
Yes, I had to do some research to figure out how to do it. It makes the replies look a lot better imo. There are times when I have to go back and edit my posts because I have the quote feature all screwed up. Kind of like in this post. That's why there's an edit.
Originally posted by AQuestion
And p.s., I have to thank you for something, you caused me to learn how to use the quote function as you do. That is pretty cool and I now know how to do it also.
Originally posted by Hydroman
I've got no clue.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
I do not know anything my friend. You tell me, who am I?
Anyways, I noticed in your signature it says that Jesus died for us because we were unwilling to die for him. What do you mean by that? According to the bible, many of his followers died because of their belief in him. I suppose that that has happened all through out history.
But, if we did die for him, then he wouldn't have had to died for us? That's what your sig seems to suggest. Could you please explain?edit on 7-8-2011 by Hydroman because: (no reason given)
Where do you get this information?
Originally posted by ren1999
A spirit's body is eternal as it is the energy extending out from the once living body in the universe in all directions.
If we seek our own truth, then nobody would be wrong. Everyone's truth could possibly differ from each other. Would that mean that everyone is right? How does that work?
Originally posted by MamaJ
Do not fear the unknown. DO not fear not having all the answers. The light shines on us and we must seek the faith within and our own truth. Its out here....everywhere. God is everywhere....all you have to do is have that sense of faith. To not see does not mean it is not there....its everywhere.
No problem and I'm not offended.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
I do not wish to offend you my friend, but I do not wish to be drawn into any lengthy discussions at this time. On the matters of Christ, I have already said all that needed to be said in the brief time that I was active here. I pop in from time to time, but time for talk is done. Now I spend my time doing what I said I came to do.
Some of his teachings are good, some are not. Mark 12:31 Is a good verse. "Love your neighbor as yourself," would make a different world if everyone lived by that. Matthew 6:34 "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own," is not good advice imo. You should be thinking about your future and planning for it, not take it one day at a time. Matthew 5:29 "If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell," seems to be bad advice as well. If it were good advice, I suppose every man in the world would be blind. Matthew 10:34-37 isn't very nice either, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me." If we are all christ, or a part of him, or whatever you believe, then that verse just doesn't make sense.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
P.S. Did you leave the studies of Christ because of his followers or because of his teachings?
Originally posted by Hydroman
I have seen people who were christians of many years say that god told them something, such as an event that would occur on a specific date, only for that day to pass and nothing happened. Did this god trick them, or did the thought come from their own mind? If it came from their own mind, how do they not know the difference between their thoughts and the difference between the voice of the creator of the universe?
Originally posted by Hydroman
Where do you get this information?
Originally posted by ren1999
A spirit's body is eternal as it is the energy extending out from the once living body in the universe in all directions.
Originally posted by MamaJ
Before Christianity.....what was in play? Was there an organized religion? Not really....there was not one book there were many..many teachers and many ways as far as the people understood and as far as I have understood.