It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Security experts have discovered the biggest series of cyber attacks to date, involving the infiltration of the networks of 72 organizations including the United Nations, governments and companies around the world.
Security company McAfee, which uncovered the intrusions, said it believed there was one "state actor" behind the attacks but declined to name it, though one security expert who has been briefed on the hacking said the evidence points to China.
The long list of victims in the five-year campaign include the governments of the United States, Taiwan, India, South Korea, Vietnam
I personal feel America should just go hack China right back as much as possible. Eye for an eye sounds reasonable. Much better than pointless bloodshed or elevated emotions and tensions over something so miniscule. I also feel America needs to step up and provide more efficient security to their sensitive data.
Originally posted by iforget
The figurative finger is getting firmly pointed a China for these attacks. How are we supposed to respond in a virtual war? Does this long series of attack dating back to 2006 come out now just to be used to further the internet security agenda? Seems a fairly cheap, effective and low-risk method for espionage. I wonder if you could learn as much about them from the data they were interested in as they can about you by stealing it?
www.reuters.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by iforget
The figurative finger is getting firmly pointed a China for these attacks.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by iforget
The figurative finger is getting firmly pointed a China for these attacks.
Why is China the automatic suspect?
the evidence points to China