It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Firefigher's Guide for
ufo related section
"Near approaches of UFOs can be harmful to human beings. Do not
stand under a UFO that is hovering at low altitude. Do not touch or
attempt to touch a UFO that has landed. In either case the safe thing
to do is to get away from there very quickly and let the military
take over. There is a possibility of radiation danger and there are
known cases where persons have been burned by rays emanating from
UFOs. Don't take chances with UFOs!"
In view of the federal law (cited earlier) empowering NASA's
administrator to impound, without a hearing, anyone who touches a UFO
or its occupants. it would be inadvisable to make personal contact
unless you are willing to submit to NASA's quarantine requirements,
should the law be invoked.
edit on 8/2/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by karen61057
There you have it folks. Thats DISCLOSURE !!! They have protocol for dealing with UFO's so they must exist!
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Cuervo
Really ? Read again. The very first paragraph says the drought has exposed what NASA says is a tank from the space shuttle Columbia. The very first paragraph, the very first sentence.
Originally posted by Cuervo
Just to clarify, the article says "could be". This doesn't confirm anything at all.
A piece of debris from NASA's space shuttle Columbia has been discovered in Texas, eight years after the 2003 disaster that destroyed the spacecraft and killed its seven-astronaut crew during re-entry, NASA officials confirmed Tuesday.
The debris was discovered last week in eastern Texas. It is a round aluminum power reactant storage and distribution tank from Columbia, which disintegrated over Texas as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere near the end of a 16-day science mission.
Originally posted by PunchingBag80
That video had no audio, and the strange object in the beginning of the video was made to look like a hatched egg. With all the fake nonsense that people are dishing out, people are going to look at this with great scepticism. I suggest some serious, loyal truth seeking.
Originally posted by gunshooter
Originally posted by ZeroReady
Here is a picture of the Power Reactant Storage and Distribution tank from the shuttle.
Here is what they found in the lake and has been claimed by NASA
Aside from both being spheres, they don't look the same. Maybe the PRSD tank sustained enough damage in the Columbia explosion to become that sphere found in Texas, but I don't know. I would say that the found sphere is not a Power Reactant Storage tank as NASA claims it is. Kind of weird...edit on 2-8-2011 by ZeroReady because: typos
this doesnt make sense, where are the ridges in the metal body compared to the one in the NASA pic, the one that was found was completely smooth. it reminds me of this ... www.youtube.com... or ya from the movie cocoon. either way, I really don't think it is what NASA says it is, there would be some sort of resemblance to the space shuttle part still other than it being the same shape.