It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
This total resentment towards the poor, while consistently claiming the wealthy provide jobs. Guess what? The working class provide labor. The poor sign up for military and provide their bodies as war chum. We're all giving up our civil liberties for the sake of security... Everyone is sacrificing, and the rich who have only profited throughout these years, aren't willing to lose a tax break? How is that not pure greed? And how is it not a total d*ck move for these wealthy CEOs to say they will be *forced* to kill jobs or send them overseas when the deal they ultimately fought for will cost millions of jobs anyway?edit on 2-8-2011 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)
Ah, the retreaded talking point of only the poor serve in the military. Where did you get this from, the Daily Kos or Code Pink?
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Originally posted by macman
They sure do. As a whole, Republicans make larger donations to charities then Democrats.
If the Govt were to get out of the "Helping" business, then more people would have more income, allowing for individual choice for more donations.
When Govt gets involved, they are the middle man, and they do take their "fair" share.
edit on 2-8-2011 by macman because: (no reason given)
Here's the thing, though. It's not really charity if you get a tax deduction for it or otherwise have to be coerced into giving it. Charity is giving, and giving freely, without asking, "What's in it for me?"
My sister once refused to buy Girl Scout cookies from my daughter unless she got a statement on Girl Scout letterhead saying how much she bought so she could write it off on her taxes.
It was $10 worth. I told her to keep her money.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by DZAG Wright
Say what you want, defend your job with your better than the rest attitude. I really don't care. There are some of us who know how the system REALLY works. I know how my daughter does, I know what she goes through. I also know what her friends do. So spare me your condescending attitude.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
This total resentment towards the poor, while consistently claiming the wealthy provide jobs. Guess what? The working class provide labor. The poor sign up for military and provide their bodies as war chum. We're all giving up our civil liberties for the sake of security... Everyone is sacrificing, and the rich who have only profited throughout these years, aren't willing to lose a tax break? How is that not pure greed? And how is it not a total d*ck move for these wealthy CEOs to say they will be *forced* to kill jobs or send them overseas when the deal they ultimately fought for will cost millions of jobs anyway?edit on 2-8-2011 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)
Ah, the retreaded talking point of only the poor serve in the military. Where did you get this from, the Daily Kos or Code Pink?
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
This total resentment towards the poor, while consistently claiming the wealthy provide jobs. Guess what? The working class provide labor. The poor sign up for military and provide their bodies as war chum. We're all giving up our civil liberties for the sake of security... Everyone is sacrificing, and the rich who have only profited throughout these years, aren't willing to lose a tax break? How is that not pure greed? And how is it not a total d*ck move for these wealthy CEOs to say they will be *forced* to kill jobs or send them overseas when the deal they ultimately fought for will cost millions of jobs anyway?edit on 2-8-2011 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)
Ah, the retreaded talking point of only the poor serve in the military. Where did you get this from, the Daily Kos or Code Pink?
Well out of all the soldiers I've served with I think there was ONE who was RUMORED to come from wealthy parents.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by Undertough
Oh I was caught up. But since you were apparently trolling over someone who admitted to posting prior to having morning coffee...i.e. not quite awake...then you deserved it.
Doesn't feel so good when someone does it to you does it? Just as the Tea Party doing what the dems did over healthcare doesn't feels o good either, does it? It's easy to cast names when someone does the opposite of what you believe, but when you do it, it is a different story.
Are republicans without conscience or empathy?
Spiritualzombie,
I am full of compassion and empathy, mostly for bleeding heart liberals who are too blind to see that they are just tools. They are being used.
The leaders of the modern day democratic party are actually modern day slavers. And they use people like you in order to futher their own ends.
How many people do entitlement programs actually help? These programs were designed to keep the poor down, they make a very good voting base. Why would I say such a thing? If you really wanted to help people get up on their own two feet would you........
A) Set up programs to build their self esteem, teach them to be self sufficient and help them find a job where they could be productive members of society. Or...............
B) Send them money or an ebt card every month.
I have seen a lot of talk about "republican brainwashing" in this thread. I wonder what those same people call it when most poor democrats vote democratic because of these entitlement programs that keep them below poverty level. Well those that aren't living in nice brick homes and pick their checks up from the mailbox in their bmw's.
For futher details on modern day slavery in the democratic party see www.abovetopsecret.com...
Bandage the bleeding Heart, dry your eyes and wake up,
Quad
Originally posted by METACOMET
There is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no virtue in advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and "sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's money.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Entitlements are just a way to keep poor people poor and voting a democrat ticket. If they really wanted to help these people they could have.
Originally posted by Undertough
Originally posted by Quadrivium
Entitlements are just a way to keep poor people poor and voting a democrat ticket. If they really wanted to help these people they could have.
Could you please explain to me the motivation to vote for a politician that is going to keep you poor and on welfare?
Originally posted by haarvik
Here's a novel idea, instead of blasting each other and playing the blame game, why not focus on the real issue. Government gone wrong! Use this energy and passion to change things. We can't even begin to debate poor/rich, have's/have not's until we fix our government. Until we do, we play into their chess game as the pawns they want us to be.