It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iterationzero
Poorly constructed analogy is poor. We can observe movies being produced. Let me know the next time you observe a universe being produced so we can both watch and you can point out God sitting in the director's chair.
Originally posted by bogomil
No, 'they' do not keep stating anything like that. That's a fantasy, you have cooked up.
Quote: ["I'm still waiting for the hard core facts from science on this matter."]
You'll need to learn at least basic science, before you can start evaluating and using it.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeekerNo one needs to learn science in order to answer the question of how the universe was created, simply because science can not answer it.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by bogomil
No, 'they' do not keep stating anything like that. That's a fantasy, you have cooked up.
Quote: ["I'm still waiting for the hard core facts from science on this matter."]
You'll need to learn at least basic science, before you can start evaluating and using it.
I guess your the lead speaker on what they claim what to be fact. No one needs to learn science in order to answer the question of how the universe was created, simply because science can not answer it.edit on 2-8-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Prezbo369
Originally posted by RealTruthSeekerNo one needs to learn science in order to answer the question of how the universe was created, simply because science can not answer it.
I hope you don't teach kids that line of thinking.......
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Given that your reply is based on a fallacy about how science is carried out, I'm sure you'll be waiting quite a while for an answer that meets your expectations.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeekerGive me one reason why I shouldn't.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
I'm not saying science in general is a fallacy. What I'm saying is that the big bang is science biggest fallacy.They have drawn this conclusion without any evidence to back it up. Science can't even give a solid answer to how the Moon was created, so how in the world could they possible know how the universe can to be?
Originally posted by ExistentialNightmare
reply to post by dbates
Correct, causation is only necessary for things that have a beginning. Of course this is way outside of the simple conversation this thread is based upon. I don't think anyone is this thread is prepared to have an actual honest discussion about an eternal God, which dimension he resides in, and how he is external to time and space.
And of course, you'd be humble enough to accept that an eternal deity is not the only possibility? There could be alternatives.
It could equally be possible that we exist within a computer program (some pose the unfalsifiable hypothesis that we could exist in "test" universe within another verse or even gallaxy - perfectly simulated reality) Good sci-fi, right?
Simulated reality is the proposition that reality could be simulated—perhaps by computer simulation—to a degree indistinguishable from "true" reality. It could contain conscious minds which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation.
There has been much debate over this topic, ranging from philosophical discourse to practical applications in computing.SOURCE
In this hypothetical: would it be wise to assume, and commit to the assumption in belief, that because humans make computers, that a character with human characteristics created the universal "computer"? (i.e. an eternal deity)
It seems to me, it is was it is; an assumption. And equally unfalsifiable as the above "simulated reality" hypothesis, of course, there is evidence that the universe is can be systematically "explained" mathematically. Mathematics is the language of the universe.edit on 2-8-2011 by ExistentialNightmare because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Prezbo369
Originally posted by RealTruthSeekerGive me one reason why I shouldn't.
Because if you really want to know how the universe started, how it came into existence, apart from science what other method would you engage in in order to determine the truth?
Well there's been a story floating around since the beginning of man about how an all powerful supreme being brought everything into existence. Of course that story has been passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years so it's most likely false. Nevertheless, it might be worthy checking into.
Man will never discover how the universe was created simply because it is always expanding.
It's just to large to be figured out with human eyes or modern day technology, or even future technology for that matter.