It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeand tors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.
The centrists of this country — liberals with sanity like myself and so-called compassionate conservatives — together constitute a huge majority of voters. If we join together, if only for this upcoming presidential election, we could make a difference.
We could elect a president concerned about us and we could throw out a majority of the incumbents in Congress and elect people who will truly represent and promote our interests. Let’s at least try.
If Republicans win back Congress in November, they should - and likely will - launch formal investigations into this criminal, scandal-ridden administration. Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has promised as much. Mr. Obama has betrayed the American people. Impeachment is the only answer. This usurper must fall.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Kuhner is a fool and obviously doesn't understand the definition of socialism. He also accuses the president of crimes without proving his point or pointing out specific laws he broke. In short, he's a partisan hack, nothing more
Having said that, I would LOOOOOOOOOOOVE for someone to primary Obama. He's NOT a democrat, he's a Republican comparable to Reagan (who I know wasn't a democrat, but had similar views if you read up on it) and the WORST poker player in history...he's a sock puppet for the GOP. Just look at how many of Bush's laws and policies he's kept. He further divided the rich and poor, and continues to do so. We're still in wars, and Gitmo's still open too. In short, someone primary him.
Palin/Bachmann aren't the answer either because they're blatanly stupid and only interested in money as well.edit on 2-8-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Kuhner is a fool and obviously doesn't understand the definition of socialism. He also accuses the president of crimes without proving his point or pointing out specific laws he broke. In short, he's a partisan hack, nothing more
Section 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Originally posted by GeoSorosReptilian
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Kuhner is a fool and obviously doesn't understand the definition of socialism. He also accuses the president of crimes without proving his point or pointing out specific laws he broke. In short, he's a partisan hack, nothing more
Having said that, I would LOOOOOOOOOOOVE for someone to primary Obama. He's NOT a democrat, he's a Republican comparable to Reagan (who I know wasn't a democrat, but had similar views if you read up on it) and the WORST poker player in history...he's a sock puppet for the GOP. Just look at how many of Bush's laws and policies he's kept. He further divided the rich and poor, and continues to do so. We're still in wars, and Gitmo's still open too. In short, someone primary him.
Palin/Bachmann aren't the answer either because they're blatanly stupid and only interested in money as well.edit on 2-8-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
So Kuhner, according to you, doesn't prove his point and is therefore a partisan hack. You state that Palin/Bachman are blatantly stupid but you fail to prove the point. By your own definition YOU ARE A PARTISAN HACK.
You may still be suffering from Bush derangement syndrome.
"If we took away the minimum wage -- if conceivably it was gone -- we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level." Michele Bachmann, Jan. 2005
Originally posted by radpetey
reply to post by MrXYZ
Did you ever think for a moment that the reason he adopted some of these policies was because they actually protect you for one, and two, the security of America as a whole.....Quit whoring yourself with the mainstream media, and look a little deeper into this mess we have gotten ourselves into.
I do not agree with the motives behind the beginning of these wars, but the fact is......we are in the middle of this mess at the moment, and in no way should we engage in this idealism we heard from a then presidential candidate.
Wake up! Turn off your Al Gore flick, and think for yourself...........PLEASE.
reply to post by Timing
When he signed the "Stimulus" package into law he funded what is know as Operation Gunrunner, or a myriad of other titles. Nixon signed into law what is known as "the War on Drugs". The Drug Cartels are the ones that smuggle the drugs into the country. Operation Gunrunner gave authority and funded the ATF to allow guns to "walk" across the boarder in the hands of the Drug Cartels. The Drug Cartels are, by law, an enemy of the state. Several of the weapons recovered had serial numbers that trace back to the ATF as being ATF owned. This is a blatant attempt at undermining the security of the United States of America by selling weapons to, by law, our enemy.
The U.S. government, primarily through ATF, ICE and Customs and Border Protection is assisting Mexico with technology, equipment and training.[87] Project Gunrunner is part of the ATF’s effort to collaborate with the Mexican authorities and its "cornerstone" has been the expansion of eTrace, a computerized system to facilitate tracing guns which were manufactured in or imported legally to the U.S.A.
This is known as Treason and it is an impeachable offense.
Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by MrXYZ
Well said, finally someone with some sense and actual knowledge of what Socialism is.
Some others in this thread are a little blind and paranoid to boot.
your power behind a huge authoritarian govt always turns out bad for the citizenry.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by 46ACE
your power behind a huge authoritarian govt always turns out bad for the citizenry.
First of all, every government is authoritarian...you might wanna look up that definition (do the same for socialism and communism as well, because you don't seem to really have a clue). Secondly, there's tons of governments that are more socialist than the US that are doing way way way waaaaay better than the US. Switzerland for example, or Sweden, or Norway...but who cares about facts, right?edit on 2-8-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
I can't help but think this one yet one more small step towards what has been planned and laid out for decades. Congressman Larry McDonald said it in 1983, quoting an article from 1947.. Minute mark 2:50:
"The objective, which we can't tell the american people because they're not sophisticated enough to see the value, is that through a steady result of erosion of "New Deals" we bring the american society steadily to the left, and through a concept of benign containment we merge into the vital centers of the socialist left"..