It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Amassuo
How about a source that is Anti-Zionist . . .
--Although the Zionists have done a lot of rewriting of history, on this point I have to agree with them that the Protocols are a hoax. The hoax was actually first discovered by non-Jews: Michael Raslovleff and Philip Graves. I'm giving you the story below in case you don't already know it.
There isn't and never was a body called the "Elders of Zion" and if any Jews were revolutionary types (e.g. the Bolsheviks) it was not the Jewish elders, sages or rabbis; it was young Jews who had distanced themselves from Jewish faith, no longer calling themselves Jews. Zionism too was a product of the minds of such irreligious Jews. It is inconceivable that there ever was a group of rabbis or sages who met and planned to take over the world.--
Follow the link for your proof.
Or continue wallowing in ignorance.
......Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light on surrounding facts. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from two point of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim (i.e. non-Jews). It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are obtained by violence and terrorization, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
Whether a State exhausts itself of its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes - in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not - it goes to the bottom.
......Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light on surrounding facts.
What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from two point of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim (i.e. non-Jews).
It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our predominance, and this state of affairs will put both sides at the mercy of our international agentur; which possesses millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.
To-day I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we symbolize our people. When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a powerful vice.
The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn.
Every republic passes through several stages. The first of these is comprised in the early days of mad raging by the blind mob, tossed hither and thither, right and left: the second is demogogy, from which is born anarchy, and that leads inevitably to despotism - not any longer legal and overt, and therefore responsible despotism, but to unseen and secretly hidden, yet nevertheless sensibly felt despotism in the hands of some secret organization or other, whose acts are the more unscrupulous inasmuch as it works behind a screen, behind the backs of all sorts of agents, the changing of whom not only does not injuriously affect but actually aids the secret force by saving it, thanks to continual changes, from the necessity of expending its resources on the rewarding of long services.
What form of administrative rule can be given to communities in which corruption has penetrated everywhere, communities where riches are attained only by the clever surprise tactics of semi-swindling tricks: where looseness reigns: where morality is maintained by penal measures and harsh laws but not by voluntarily accepted principles: where the feelings toward faith and country are obliterated by cosmopolitan convictions? What form of rule is to be given to these communities if not that despotism which I shall describe to you later? We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by patternfinder
Let me ask you.
Who do you hate. The Jews, or the Zionists?