Terrible Development! Ridiculous Compromise yet again!, page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 104 times


reply posted on 3-8-2011 @ 03:55 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by lunatux



Wow.

I definitely don't want Romney, Bachmann, or Perry.

Ron Paul is the Answer!! BUT, I would take Marco Rubio.

The $1Trillion for Public Works was already spent on Corporate Bailouts, while record profits were being made! Obama promised us public works, he pushed through the spending bill, and the works never materialized, just fat cat bonuses. The economy never recovered, the jobs were never created, and nothing ever trickled down.

So, here we are at the precipice yet again, we raised the ceiling another $1T, and we passed another toothless bill, and yet the credit rating is still going down the toilet, the global stocks are still tumbling, and the gold market is still reaching record highs.

Your way didn't work either. Just another $2T for our kids to carry the burden. In fact, over the 10 year term of this bill, it is more like $20T for our kids to burden. The debt ceiling is doubling about every 5 years. My 4 year old can expect $40T in debt when he graduates high school!

The GDP is not doubling every 5 years, so the deficit is growing and the likelihood of recovering is evaporating fast.

Sorry. There is no way to paint this situation more dire than real. It is just about as bad as it can possibly be, and it is getting worse by the moment. It is impossible to exaggerate, because it is already a worst-case scenario.


reply posted on 3-8-2011 @ 06:18 PM by ibtek
Reagan raised it 18 times and Bush 3 OMG! But wait, by how much? Oh oh....

Lets see according to the White Houses own records at

www.whitehouse.gov...

Reagan raised it $1.82T over his 2 terms or $0.91T per term.
HW Bush $1.28T in 1 term
Clinton $1.58T in 2 terms or $0.79T per term
GW Bush $4.92T in 2 terms or $2.46T per term
Obama $4.79T in 0.65 terms

Obama almost passing GW Bush's 2 term total, but in just over half of his first term.


reply posted on 3-8-2011 @ 07:24 PM by Azdraik
Originally posted by ibtek
Reagan raised it 18 times and Bush 3 OMG! But wait, by how much? Oh oh....

Lets see according to the White Houses own records at

www.whitehouse.gov...

Reagan raised it $1.82T over his 2 terms or $0.91T per term.
HW Bush $1.28T in 1 term
Clinton $1.58T in 2 terms or $0.79T per term
GW Bush $4.92T in 2 terms or $2.46T per term
Obama $4.79T in 0.65 terms

Obama almost passing GW Bush's 2 term total, but in just over half of his first term.


Yep all a bunch of back and forth BS.

When your kids keep blaming each other about who did what, do you stand there listening or do you tell them to be shut up and get the cleaning done?


reply posted on 3-8-2011 @ 07:28 PM by crimvelvet
reply to post by Asktheanimals



If this is where we're headed the country will either fall as a Republic or convulse in revolution.
This is a naked power grab and high treason against the people of the United States.


Very well put.

It deserves to be repeated again.


reply posted on 4-8-2011 @ 12:13 AM by bone13
reply to post by getreadyalready



THATS right, put the blame where it belong, the Democrats under Obama, in NY we lost a chance to get the Olympics and a new statium but a DEMOCART, in lower Manhatten said NO, meaning NYers where not good enough, NY State lost 1 Billion dollars in Taxes over 10 years, YET they all will Retire Millionairs, with full Health, THIS is what the Dems in Washington are Doing getting people let yourself, to go without the real facts, its your Furture benefits. In case you did not do your homework, THE Olympics bring JOBS and Housing, thats four years of jobs and benefits lost, to NYers.


reply posted on 4-8-2011 @ 12:48 AM by hawkiye
reply to post by lunatux






Cheney said deficits don't matter and it is the one thing he may have been right about. The kids will be all right. This nonsense too will pass.


No this will not pass! This type of financial insanity is unsustainable! Try balancing your check book this way and see how long you last... You cannot defy mathematics. Simply put we are at the end of the fiat currency/debt expansion based economy cycle and this was the final nail in the coffin....



reply posted on 4-8-2011 @ 06:36 PM by aero56
reply to post by MidnightTide




Especially for seniors: journals.democraticunderground.com...

They don't want us around, and will do what it takes to let us die off, or kill us.


reply posted on 5-8-2011 @ 11:21 AM by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to
post by lunatux



Wow.

I definitely don't want Romney, Bachmann, or Perry.

Ron Paul is the Answer!! BUT, I would take Marco Rubio.

The $1Trillion for Public Works was already spent on Corporate Bailouts, while record profits were being made! Obama promised us public works, he pushed through the spending bill, and the works never materialized, just fat cat bonuses. The economy never recovered, the jobs were never created, and nothing ever trickled down.

So, here we are at the precipice yet again, we raised the ceiling another $1T, and we passed another toothless bill, and yet the credit rating is still going down the toilet, the global stocks are still tumbling, and the gold market is still reaching record highs.

Your way didn't work either. Just another $2T for our kids to carry the burden. In fact, over the 10 year term of this bill, it is more like $20T for our kids to burden. The debt ceiling is doubling about every 5 years. My 4 year old can expect $40T in debt when he graduates high school!

The GDP is not doubling every 5 years, so the deficit is growing and the likelihood of recovering is evaporating fast.

Sorry. There is no way to paint this situation more dire than real. It is just about as bad as it can possibly be, and it is getting worse by the moment. It is impossible to exaggerate, because it is already a worst-case scenario.


How about President Sarah Palin / VP Marco Rubio?

I could see that very easily. Both want the size of the U.S. government reduced.
The entire world is looking to America to get its act together.
Lets get started.


reply posted on 5-8-2011 @ 01:17 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by Eurisko2012



Man that would give me ulcers. I don't really like Palin, but I love Rubio, and I hate the status quo. That combination would definitely shake up the status quo!

Can you see Palin at a UN meeting? Or in a room with Putin and his military advisors? Scary thought, but then again, imagining Obama in that same room is pretty dam scary as well!!


reply posted on 7-8-2011 @ 05:17 PM by ontarff
Originally posted by evil12day
The part that really pisses me off is the cuts from safety net and medical programs . It's like wow really guys? You're totally fine still funding warfare and greasing your palms with a pretty penny but you're gonna screw the little guys? OUT OF ALL THE PROGRAMS TO CUT THOSE SEEM REASONABLE? How about you lower the salary you get every freaking year huh? Like it would kill you to lose a couple of grand and stop having parties on your yachts for the good of the country. No no can't do that.


I am weary of reading people's comments believing it is government's responsibility to provide a "safety net". Where is personal responsibility? What have you done to prepare for any of life's potholes you may encounter? Getting educated in preparation for a job and saving for your own retirement instead of relying on the government to do it for you is a start. Too many Americans do not plan for their own future. Illegal immigrants do the work Americans will not do while many Americans sit at home watching their TV. Almost 50% do not pay taxes and yet believe the ones who do should pay more for their medical programs, education, food stamps to eat, etc...

Many countries that have played a bigger role in people's lives providing a "safety net", do so with a much higher tax rate. This is what the left wing "progressives" want. "Obama care" is a good example of a "safety net" program shoved through Congress without many of the elected officials even reading the bill or intelligently discussing the cost of funding of the bill.

Americans need to exercise their freedom of choice to manage their own income and use the market to shop for the companies that will support them for different contingencies. Freedom of choice creates more competition for a better system to prevail. The government should be left to assuring commerce for free trade and defense. Name one single efficient well managed government program. There isn't one I am aware of. Does it make any sense to let the government regulate your life by making more decisions for you? I think not!

Our country is broke trying to regulate so many "safety nets" for people who cannot plan for themselves and have strayed from their constitutional rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", by sitting on their ass and whining why the government doesn't take better care of them.
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 19 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags
Ron Paul, Adam Smith Push To End Indefinite Detention Of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 20 member flags