Anonymous actually does have some leadership, as in at least a council. I think it fragmented or something a year or two ago. Locally for me 2-3 years
ago Anon was just all about targetting scientology. It just seemed like a thing for lamers, hackers, kids and faux-activists to take on board. The
'true' Anon of masses of disenfranchised peoples, WITHOUT leadership, can not really do much, considering it takes some leadership to get organised.
Not to mention any leadership would then provide an option for co-opting, corruption etc. However the 'false' Anon is already like this, a council,
deciding what to do with *some* 'democratic' process among these few 'anon elites'. It's just like a big random think tank.. unless someone leads and
says 'let us move this way..'
I assume that since the beginning, it was just another disinfo tool. Anon will do nothing to expose blacker than black budgets. Anon will not stop
wars. Anon will not inform anyone of anything of much importance. Anon WILL waste peoples time protesting outside scientology centres (and thereby
getting those protesters on scientology hate lists). Anon will be co-opted if not from day 0. Anon will be misused or misdirected by either a
psychopath or elite agenda.
Power corrupts absolute power corrupts absolutely. End of story..
The psychopathic 5% of humanity are very good at spreading into all areas and fields of our societies. They will want to use Anon for their own
purposes soon - if it was not them that actually created it in its first modern incarnation.
While privacy is so important and rare now, I think it would be more important everyone took their masks off and stood up and marched together. Good
old fashioned activism. So we could weed out the black block undercover cops for one thing.
The last protest in Melbourne that made any difference to at least the way people thought.. was September 11th, 2000, S11 WTO protests over 3 days.
Since then, the activist movement has been downhill.
Everything happens for a reason - Anon are no different, they are controlled well.
It is the random mutation of events and interactions that is the true enemy to the decaying status quo. It is people openly discussing things on
facebook and consensus being found among multitudes of people that will help evolve peoples' thinking and promote emotional, spiritual and
Without an awakening of AWARENESS and TRANSPARENCY - not an embrace of opacity, with which we will triumph as a species. The dark opaque masks will
only hide those wishing to use these movements for their own ends.
I just wish EVERYONE in the world decided tomorrow to start wearing veils/ hijabs etc.. that would be a start for privacy! I'd feel more comfortable
in my hoody too! So i'm not against people wearing masks while rioting etc..! And I do think it would be great if we were *ALLOWED* to cover our faces
without suspicion.. ie hijab women are ok but if I wear my ninja mask I am something dodgy lol.. criminal at least it would be assumed. I would like
to wear a nice gas mask walking down the street, to filter out chemtrail residues and general smog/smoke too. But I would be instantly targetted as I
would not be normal enough.
So in that sense I like masks.. I think we should all own those LED hats that make infra-red cameras flare out your face on nightvision cameras.. but
for our voices to be heard and counted, I think we should be all unmasked. It is more dangerous. But what would the great activists be without their
identities? Aung San Suu Kyi without her identity?? I could not imagine any effect if she wore a mask..
Imagine if we never knew Nelson Mandela's face?
I don't think the impact these people have made would have been anywhere nearly so significant if they were masked!!
edit on 13-8-2011 by
lastninja because: (no reason given)