The most dangerous untruths are truths moderately distorted. ~Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. ~Winston Churchill
The lifting of the Veil
Apocalypse is the Greek word for the “lifting of the veil”; a metaphor for revealing the truth.
There are a several resources I find invaluable in reaching a 911 apocalypse. One is “:Collateral Damage”, another is Leslie Raphael’s
outstanding companion piece to the Naudet 911 film. These two eye opening articles, when combined, tell a completely different story than what most
people have heard, if they can hear anything above the din of the Official Story and the infighting of the Truth Movement.
Raphael’s piece is a tome actually and I can heartily recommend it to anyone serious about discovering the truth of 911. Mr. Raphael recommends
reading his piece as a study guide to the film, so spring for a few bucks to buy the Naudet movie, you’ll be glad you did. I do not agree with all
he contends and I’m certain he would not agree with much of my position, but Raphael’s work makes a strong case that the Naudets were in place to
stage the shot of the first impact, which makes them accessories to mass murder.
Excerpts from “Jules Naudet’s First Plane Shot Was Staged”, by Leslie Raphael:
Congratulations ! You are reading the one 9/11 website with a hope in hell of getting us somewhere : one with some actual hard documentary
(literally) evidence behind it —and one that names names. You won't find the Illuminati in this one ; you won't find the claim that no planes ever
hit the Trade Center, because I don't believe that ; you won't find your time wasted with "proofs" of demolitions carried out by folk who are never
identified, even by speculation.
Step 1 : anyone interested in 9/11, no matter what your views on who did it, should already have a DVD copy of the film "9/11," directed by Jules and
Gédéon Naudet and James Hanlon. If you think you're an expert on 9/11, but you don't have that film, you're not.
He exposes corrupt members of the FDNY, OEM, Mayor Guliani’s office, the NYPD and more, and exposes the film itself as a propaganda piece that was
part and parcel to the whole operation and a centerpiece to the ensuing propaganda barrage so essential to its long term success.
He proves the first strike shot from Naudet was staged, yet misses the point that if Naudet was in place and ready to take video of the first strike,
then he was in place to take video of the towers prior to impact too, making it an easy thing to use layering techniques and the clear, blue sky as a
huge “green screen” to edit in, or edit out anything he wished. His “live” shot was a composite of the “before” sequence and the
“live” sequence. Disagreements aside, it is still an excellent resource for understanding 911.
The next is Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 by EP Heidner. This is like an encyclopedia of
evil. I’ll let the author do the talking:
“This report contends that not only were the buildings targets, but that specific offices within each building were the designated targets.
These offices unknowingly held information which if exposed, subsequently would expose a national security secret of unimaginable magnitude.
Protecting that secret was the motivation for the September 11th attacks. This report is about that national security secret: its origins and impact.
The intent of the report is to provide a context for understanding the events of September 11th rather than to define exactly what happened that day.
Initially, it is difficult to see a pattern to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of the World Trade Center, a segment
of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives. However, if the perceived objective of the attack is re-defined from its
commonly suggested ‘symbolic’ designation as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins by looking at it as
purely a crime with specific objectives (as opposed to a political action), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction. This article
provides research into the early claims by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a
cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence(ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September
After six years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and proposes a new rationale for the September
11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies – or inconvenient facts surrounding this event - take on a meaning that is consistent with the
claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion
dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western
investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail multiple Federal
investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under the cardinal rule of
intelligence: “protect your resources” and consistent with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause. The case for detailed
targeting of the attacks begins with analysis of the attack on the Pentagon. After one concludes that the targeting of the ONI office in the Pentagon
was not random – and that information is presented later. – one then must ask: is it possible that the planes that hit the World Trade Center, and
the bombs reported by various witnesses to have been set off inside the buildings 1, 6 and 7 and the basement of the Towers, were deliberately located
to support the execution of a crime of mind-boggling proportions? In considering that question, a pattern emerges. For the crimes alleged by Eastman,
Flocco, Durham and Schwarz to be successful, the vault in the basement of the World Trade Center, and its contents - less than a billion in gold, but
hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities - had to be destroyed. A critical mass of brokers from the major government security
brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240
billion dollars of covert securities could be electronically “cleared” without anyone asking questions- which happened when the Federal Reserve
declared an emergency and invoked its“ emergency powers.” that very afternoon.
The ongoing Federal investigations into the crimes funded by those securities needed to be ended or disrupted by destroying evidence in Buildings 6, 7
Finally, one has to understand and demonstrate the inconceivable: that $240 billion in covert, and possibly illegal government funding could have been
and were created in September of 1991. Filling in the last piece of the puzzle requires understanding 50 years of history of key financial
organizations in the United States, understanding how U.S. Intelligence became a key source of their off-balance sheet accounts, and why this was
sanctioned by every President since Truman.
With that, a pattern of motivation is defined which allows government leaders and intelligence operatives to ‘rationalize’ a decision to cause the
death 3,000 citizens.”
Due to the nature of the story, and the accompanying secrecy, details and “mainstream” source material are understandably hard to find, giving
mainstream media reason to discount the story. None the less, the revelations produced by Heidner expose a motive that makes much more sense than the
B-movie script version we are all familiar with. When 911 is investigated as a crime, and not an act of terrorism, what can we surmise by examining
what was accomplished? The main goals appear to have been intended to at least:
1. Destroy evidence of institutional lawlessness in government, finance, military and business.
2. Silence investigations into the above.
3. Demolish the white elephants known as the Twin Towers.
4. Provide pretext for world war and hegemony in the guise of the Global War on Terrorism.
5. Allow the continuation of a culture of plunder and corruption
That’s quite a list, even for psychos, but it doesn’t take long to imagine how they pulled it off once you shake off a few preconceived notions.
“Successful” people are more often than not, rat bastards who became successful by being more ruthless than the next guy. Survival of the
fittest, however worthy in the natural world only works in the civilized world when everyone knows the rules. Most of us don’t realize we’re the
targets in an epic class war, or that our class is losing. “Live and let live” is what we’re told, while they’re picking our pockets.
Probably the most dangerous misconception and most important myth to dispel first is the myth of the independent media. This myth has been carefully
nurtured to the point where to Americans, the name Walter Cronkite is synonymous with journalism, with the man having the same stature as Mother
Theresa, or Bono if you’re younger than 60. But nothing could be further than the truth. Media have been the tools of war since the beginning, and
this is war by deception.
pro•pa•gan•da noun ˌprä-pə-ˈgan-də, ˌprō-
1 capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an
effect — pro•pa•gan•dist -dist noun or adjective —
pro•pa•gan•dis•tic -ˌgan-ˈdis-tik adjective — pro•pa•gan•dis•ti•cal•ly -ti-k(ə-)lē adverb
A brief history:
The Bible and other religious texts are prime examples of ancient totalitarian propaganda benefiting an easily identifiable selection of dominant
members of society. It’s no news to anyone with a pulse that religion in general is a very powerful propaganda tool effective for:
“: the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person”
From “Propaganda and Persuasion”:
The use of propaganda has been an integral part of human history and can be traced back to ancient Greece for its philosophical and theoretical
origins. Used effectively by Alexander the Great, the Roman Empire, and the early Christians, propaganda became an integral part of the religious
conflicts of the Reformation. The invention of the printing press was quickly adopted by Martin Luther in his fight against the Catholic Church and
provided the ideal medium for the widespread use of propagandistic materials. Each new medium of communication was quickly adopted for use by
propagandists, especially during the American and French revolutions and later by Napoleon. By the end of the 19th century, improvements in the size
and speed of the mass media had greatly increased the sophistication and effectiveness of propaganda.
From "Persuasion and Propaganda in Networked Communication: Anti-globalization
Activists and the Tactics for New Media":
“The use of propaganda as a means of controlling information flow, managing public opinion, or manipulating behavior is as old as recorded
history. The concept of persuasion is an integral part of human nature, and the use of specific techniques to bring about large-scale shifts in ideas
can be traced back to the ancient world. Many artifacts from prehistory and from earliest civilizations provide us with evidence that attempts were
being made to use the equivalent of modern-day propaganda techniques to communicate the purported majesty and supernatural powers of rulers and
priests. In a largely preliterate age, dazzling costumes, insignia, and monuments were deliberately created symbols designed to evoke a specific image
of superiority and power that these early propagandists wished to convey to their audience.
The history of propaganda is based on three interweaving elements: first, the increasing need, with the growth of civilization and the rise of
nationstates, to win what has been called “the battle for people’s minds”; second, the increasing sophistication of the means of communication
available to deliver propagandistic messages; and third, the increasing understanding of the psychology of propaganda and the commensurate application
of such behavioral findings. Throughout history, these three elements have been combined in various ways to enhance and encourage the use of
propaganda as a means of altering attitudes and for the creation of new ideas or perspectives. Only in comparatively modern times, however, have
scholars and scientists begun to understand and assess the role of such mass propaganda techniques as an aspect of the social process.
The history of propaganda does not develop as a clear linear progression, but certain significant historical benchmarks are worth examining as
illustrations of how propaganda has been used at different times. In each case, those wishing to control or manage others (the propagandists) have
made maximum and intelligent use of the forms of communication (the media) available to them while also accurately gauging the psychological
susceptibility of their audiences so that their messages could be tailored to ensure the best possible reception. The successful propagandist is able
to discern the basic beliefs, needs, or fears of the audience and to play upon those.”
What you consider to be entertainment and news (if indeed you can distinguish the two today), can only be described as wartime propaganda. Don’t
make the mistake of thinking your government is there to protect you; history has proven they are there to harness your labor and direct it wherever
it suits “national interest”, a euphemism for “corporate interest”. They won’t tell you this is their intent; you might object, so they lie
to you with propaganda. Their actions speak louder than their words; for to the owner class you are beasts of burden, or did you miss the
significance of your role in the workforce being referred to as “human capital”?
Most American psychos in training don’t learn history, or if they do, it is the sanitized version provided by State reeducation centers. We’re
taught to think of Nazis and Hitler as the worst evil to have visited our little world and everyone loves to remember the lock the Nazis had on
wartime propaganda; Goebbels is a favored demon to drag out of the dungeon to make us shudder like children who swear they just saw the bogie man.
Everyone knows the Germans were evil and they used propaganda to further their evil cause. But few Americans know the Germans were using propaganda
techniques perfected by our own “independent media” here at home:
“Hitler learned to admire American propaganda through a young American expatriate who described to him, in glowing detail, how Americans enjoyed
the atmosphere at football games. This American expatriate, with the memorable name of Ernst "Putzi" Hanfstängl, told the Führer how Americans could
be whipped up into a frenzy through blaring music, group cheers, and chants against the enemy.”
No one beats American propaganda, precisely because you think its news and entertainment. You are filled with fairy tails of Woodward, Bernstein, and
Walter Cronkite, when the reality is even the great Cronkite was a CIA asset under the umbrella of Operation Mockingbird:
Walter Cronkite's death has caused an outpouring of grief and glowing remembrances from people who did not know the real Cronkite and who are
ignorant of their own history. Cronkite, called "the most trusted man in America" during his tenure as CBS Evening News anchor, was quite
untrustworthy when it came to uncovering the truth about the biggest news story of the 20th century--the assassination of President Kennedy. Yeah,
I've seen the video of his "choked-up" reporting of JFK's death on Nov. 22, 1963, but what I remember most is his 1967 CBS documentary which supported
and praised the Warren Commission's work. The Warren Report (authored by the CIA's own Allen Dulles) has since been exposed as a 26-volume pack of
lies, but Walter went to his grave defending it. This indefensible lapse in journalistic integrity and fortitude was no accident. Walter was either
ordered, or strongy "encouraged," to mislead Americans by his boss, William Paley.”
Every now and then, whether by design or by accident, we get a glimpse of the truth, and when guys like these talk, I listen:
In the second half of the 20th century, the burgeoning American media was co-opted by something called Operation Mockingbird, the CIA's subversion
of the free press in America. Frank Wisner, who ran the project in the 1940s and 1950s for the Agency, once famously said that the American media was
like his own "...personal Wurlitzer; I can play any tune I want on it and America will follow along."
In the 1970s, CIA director William Colby admitted, "The CIA owns assets at every major media outlet in America, TV networks, newspapers, publishing
houses, and magazines."
In a 1977 Rolling Stone article, Carl Bernstein estimated that there were hundreds, perhaps thousands, of CIA-friendly assets at all the major TV
networks, newspapers and periodicals in America.
We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. -- William Casey, CIA Director (from
first staff meeting in 1981)
1981 was what, about 35 odd years into the Black Eagle Trust? Casey, as the head of the CIA certainly knew about it, and at his first staff meeting,
he made it clear the agency’s intent was to be sure: “everything the American public believes is false.” As a sane person, I can’t think of
any reason why our government would want us to believe falsehoods, much less everything. Well, any good reason, that is. But thinking like a psycho,
I could probably come up with many good reasons.
Why would the Central Intelligence Agency create a program of disinformation to ensure “everything the American public believes is false.”?
Because they’re barking mad, that’s why.
And how’d they do with that effort anyway? What if Casey was literally not lying, and what if they succeeded? What if everything you believe
really is false?
The moon landings?
Surely not everything.
Unfortunately you can’t be sure unless you do the work yourselves, and the CIA fellas know you’d rather be watching TV. But just in case you
aren’t so easily swayed, here’s a third tool you can use to help unravel 911 by using it to help identify propaganda and propagandist methods:
How many schmaltzy detective stories have you sat through where the detective has to “get inside the head” of the criminal, and think like him to
beat him? To solve this caper, you’ll need to think like psychos, real ones, flush with money and endless time.
(to be cont.)
edit on 5-8-2011 by Yankee451 because: (no reason given)