Neanderthals' Demise Caused by Modern Human Invasion, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 30-7-2011 @ 04:33 AM by mobiusmale
www.guardian.co.uk...

Neanderthals died out in Western Europe after a surge of modern humans arrived from Africa and made them a minority in their own land, researchers claim.

The swarm of Homo sapiens onto the continent more than 40,000 years ago left the Neanderthals, who had thrived in the frigid conditions for 300 millennia, outnumbered by a massive 10 to one.


According to the authors, a combination of numerical, technical and social superiority eventually led to the displacement of the Neanderthals...and eventually to their extinction (perhaps aided by severe climactic conditions as their end neared).

Here is a statement that I find interesting/suspicious...

Faced with this kind of competition, the Neanderthals seem to have retreated initially into more marginal and less attractive regions of the continent and eventually, within a space of at most a hundred thousand years, for their populations to have declined to extinction
.

A hundred thousand years...really? It took the invading hordes perhaps 100,000 years to displace their vastly inferior human competitors?

When the Europeans invaded North America, it took...what...100 years to decimate the Native population and culture. When they made it to South America...how long did it take to completely overcome the local peoples?

Any invasion, or mass migration, of people from one region to another is usually no more than a one or two generation struggle...with the stronger forces winning the day in fairly rapid fashion - especially in circumstances where there would have been fierce competition for food and other resources (as the authors suggest).

When studying artifacts, bones etc. scientists always seem to describe things in terms of enormous spans of time...hundreds of thousands or million of years. If we look at recorded history, enormous changes...on continental scales...have occurred over time spans of a mere "hundreds of years".

Technology, especially during the last 600 years or so has progressed steadily...now exponentially.

If we are to believe the time frames prescribed by scholars of humankind's past...humans went spans of thousands of years without making any kind of meaningful improvements to methods, materials, the sciences, etc. I consider this highly unlikely.

And to suggest that it may have taken Homo Sapiens as long as 100,000 years to establish their dominance over Neanderthal Man, just seems to ignore everything that we know about human conflict since we started keeping records.


reply posted on 30-7-2011 @ 05:05 AM by goldentorch
reply to post by DeepThoughtCriminal



Exactly and also as dealt with on other threads ie:

Dna

The Neanderthals would seem to have been assimilated rather than crushed in any genocidal manner. Which of course would make sense of the timeline.
edit on 30/7/11 by goldentorch because: clarification

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



How Are Plants Aware of the World Around Them?
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
The Genesis Code
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags
Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags
We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags