Instead of that, how about thinking what was there before the big bang or whats outside of what we know? much better questions
What If OUR solar system is on the elongated eliptical orbit with PLANET X?, page 2
privacy
reply posted on 30-7-2011 @ 12:02 AM by Drunkenparrot
reply to post by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
Xcalibur254's rebuttal is absolutely spot on correct.
The existence of dark matter was hypothesized to account for discrepancies between the calculated and observed mass and velocities of galaxies.
Although there is some evidence to support the idea there are current theories involving modified gravity that do not require dark matter to explain what science observes in the workings of the cosmos.
In short dark matter is a creation of science to rectify what general relativity predicts and what we actually see when we look because the two do not agree by a wide margin.
Dark matter is science saying we don't know yet so you would get just as far postulating that flying monkeys riding magic unicorns are responsible for the lack of evidence in support of your invisible planet.
If the possibilities are unlimited and anything is possible I'll bet on the flying monkeys every time.
Regarding the possible flaws in the premise of your post, What If OUR solar system is on the elongated eliptical orbit with PLANET X? , please take a quick look and a moment out to understand the word Barycenter.
A little knowledge can be a wondrous thing while trying to make sense out of the internet.
Xcalibur254's rebuttal is absolutely spot on correct.
The existence of dark matter was hypothesized to account for discrepancies between the calculated and observed mass and velocities of galaxies.
Although there is some evidence to support the idea there are current theories involving modified gravity that do not require dark matter to explain what science observes in the workings of the cosmos.
In short dark matter is a creation of science to rectify what general relativity predicts and what we actually see when we look because the two do not agree by a wide margin.
Dark matter is science saying we don't know yet so you would get just as far postulating that flying monkeys riding magic unicorns are responsible for the lack of evidence in support of your invisible planet.
If the possibilities are unlimited and anything is possible I'll bet on the flying monkeys every time.
Regarding the possible flaws in the premise of your post, What If OUR solar system is on the elongated eliptical orbit with PLANET X? , please take a quick look and a moment out to understand the word Barycenter.
A little knowledge can be a wondrous thing while trying to make sense out of the internet.
reply posted on 30-7-2011 @ 03:33 PM by MrGrimm
Originally posted by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
reply to post by MrGrimm
Yea your so focused on a mystery planet that you have shut off your mind to the UNLIMITED possibilites of what it might actually be
Wait... What?
How have I shut myself down to other possibilities?
reply posted on 30-7-2011 @ 07:52 PM by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
reply to post by MrGrimm
Because you all are looking for evidence of a planet, theres no chance its going to be that easy. It will be somthing no one thought of, the reason there is so much hype around a huge planet coming for us is because its completely rediculous. I just use planet x as a description because thats what everyone has been told. I dont think for a instance that it will be a planet, I believe it will be somthing unimaginable, untill were right on the verge of whatever it brings
Because you all are looking for evidence of a planet, theres no chance its going to be that easy. It will be somthing no one thought of, the reason there is so much hype around a huge planet coming for us is because its completely rediculous. I just use planet x as a description because thats what everyone has been told. I dont think for a instance that it will be a planet, I believe it will be somthing unimaginable, untill were right on the verge of whatever it brings
reply posted on 31-7-2011 @ 03:19 AM by MrGrimm
Originally posted by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
reply to post by MrGrimm
Because you all are looking for evidence of a planet...
I'm not referring to everyone else; I'm referring as to how I gave you that impression.
Also, please consider that the threads topic is clearly labeled "What If OUR solar system is on the elongated eliptical orbit with PLANET X?"
So in case you're wondering why I am talking about a fictional planet, take that into consideration.
reply posted on 2-8-2011 @ 01:15 PM by stereologist
reply to post by MrGrimm
None of what you claim is in Sumerian tablets. There is virtually no astronomical information in Sumerian tablets. The reason that archaeologists believe that there was Sumerian interest in astronomy is that Babylonian tablets use Sumerian names for celestial objects.
As far as rockets and spacesuits and all the rest, it's all made up by Sitchin and VonDaniken and others.
Mainly because of the amount of cuneiform tablets that deal with astronomy, however, it’s hard to disprove of the reference to rockets, spacesuits and technology that is referred to in the readings. But… that’s not what’s in question here.
None of what you claim is in Sumerian tablets. There is virtually no astronomical information in Sumerian tablets. The reason that archaeologists believe that there was Sumerian interest in astronomy is that Babylonian tablets use Sumerian names for celestial objects.
As far as rockets and spacesuits and all the rest, it's all made up by Sitchin and VonDaniken and others.
reply posted on 2-8-2011 @ 01:17 PM by stereologist
reply to post by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
What difference does that make? That even supposed some absolute reference system.
There is always somthing bigger, so what if we are heading towards planet x instead of planet x heading toward us.
What difference does that make? That even supposed some absolute reference system.
reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 07:09 PM by MrGrimm
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by MrGrimm
Mainly because of the amount of cuneiform tablets that deal with astronomy, however, it’s hard to disprove of the reference to rockets, spacesuits and technology that is referred to in the readings. But… that’s not what’s in question here.
None of what you claim is in Sumerian tablets. There is virtually no astronomical information in Sumerian tablets. The reason that archaeologists believe that there was Sumerian interest in astronomy is that Babylonian tablets use Sumerian names for celestial objects.
As far as rockets and spacesuits and all the rest, it's all made up by Sitchin and VonDaniken and others.
Would you agree that the zodiac is a form of ancient astronomy?
reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 07:27 PM by Xcalibur254
reply to post by MrGrimm
Yes, the Zodiac is a form of ancient astronomy, however it is a Babylonian creation. The classic Zodiac is a modification of the MUL.APIN catalog, which was published in 1000 BCE. There is no indication that the Akkadians or the Sumerians had anything like the Zodiac. In fact there isn't even any indication that there was a celestial coordinate system before the 1st millennium BCE when it was created by the Babylonians.
Yes, the Zodiac is a form of ancient astronomy, however it is a Babylonian creation. The classic Zodiac is a modification of the MUL.APIN catalog, which was published in 1000 BCE. There is no indication that the Akkadians or the Sumerians had anything like the Zodiac. In fact there isn't even any indication that there was a celestial coordinate system before the 1st millennium BCE when it was created by the Babylonians.
reply posted on 15-8-2011 @ 09:25 PM by stereologist
reply to post by MrGrimm
I am not claiming that the Sumerians were without astronomy. I am stating that the Sumerian interest in astronomy is based on other records and not theirs.
As Xcalibur254 points out there were other civilizations in the area that were later and did leave behind records that can be studied.
I am not claiming that the Sumerians were without astronomy. I am stating that the Sumerian interest in astronomy is based on other records and not theirs.
As Xcalibur254 points out there were other civilizations in the area that were later and did leave behind records that can be studied.
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
10-year-old deaf girl hears herself for the first time-Must See!!
Science & Technology: 17 hours ago, 34 flags
Science & Technology: 17 hours ago, 34 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Aussie Gov Says They'll Fine Anyone Who Blames Carbon Tax For Price Increases, Despite Carbon Tax C
Breaking Alternative News: 17 hours ago, 63 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 17 hours ago, 63 replies
Security backdoor found in China-made US military chip
Breaking Alternative News: 16 hours ago, 32 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 16 hours ago, 32 replies
Fury as school girls forced by teachers to lift up their tops to prove they aren’t hiding mobile p
Other Current Events: 16 hours ago, 30 replies
Other Current Events: 16 hours ago, 30 replies
Syrian diplomats ordered to leave Australia in next 72 hrs.
Breaking Political News: 10 hours ago, 27 replies
Breaking Political News: 10 hours ago, 27 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.231 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.231 seconds
