ChemTrail above Sydney, Australia right now??? see pics...

reply to post by adeclerk


hi adeclerk,
and thanks for the reply...
+sorry for delay...

i concede U make relevant points,

my point is that i am not 100% sure that "they " are not poisoning us...

"they" have underground bunkers dont forget...

and do U agree that FLUORIDATION is good for the community in general...?

thanks again

+ seeya...

ps... today i was at the tip, and i looked up in the sky and saw another similar " chemtrail"...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fc7e6d8fe6f5.jpg[/atsimg]


and this

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c3322e5661ad.jpg[/atsimg]





coincidence ... maybe...

+ i also acknowledge that ( i think ) weather conditions were conducive today for contrails...

but why do some contrails ( most IMHO) disappear so fast...,

and others ( chemtrails ?) persist and spread, like they seem to...?

seeya

Originally posted by shaneR
but why do some contrails ( most IMHO) disappear so fast...,

and others ( chemtrails ?) persist and spread, like they seem to...?

seeya

Different engines, different power settings, or different altitudes can all cause this. See full explanation:

Contrail Science: Why do some planes leave long trails, but others don't

Originally posted by shaneR
my point is that i am not 100% sure that "they " are not poisoning us...

"they" have underground bunkers dont forget...

and do U agree that FLUORIDATION is good for the community in general...?

It doesn't appear to be harmful, but it is my opinion that it is not benefiting the community as a whole. Children under 2, however, benefit greatly from fluoride. And the benefits extend into their adult lives (when they have nice strong, cavity-free teeth).

I think uncinus hit upon the other points pretty well.

reply to post by Uncinus


thanks Uncinus, excellent info, and much appreciated...

wow clouds are even cooler than i thought...

seeya

reply to post by adeclerk


hi adeclerk, and thanks again for the reply...

it might be good for two year olds, but why give it to the whole population,?
doesnt seem cost effective to me...

+
i agree that it doesnt "appear" to be that bad ( fluoridation),
but it is the " unseen" side...

supposedly this stuff "dumbs" people down... a brain sedative...(eg: Nazi use).

any opinion...?

it used to be the active ingredient in common rat poison too...?

can that be good for us?


seeya

Originally posted by shaneR
it might be good for two year olds, but why give it to the whole population,?
doesnt seem cost effective to me...

It's not about cost, it's about putting something that is good for people up to two years of age in the water, so that they will have strong teeth when they are adults!

Originally posted by shaneR
i agree that it doesnt "appear" to be that bad ( fluoridation),

It really isn't, especially the way it is being used. I wouldn't want to be exposed to the stuff before dilution, that's for sure!

Originally posted by shaneR
but it is the " unseen" side...

supposedly this stuff "dumbs" people down... a brain sedative...(eg: Nazi use).

any opinion...?

it used to be the active ingredient in common rat poison too...?

can that be good for us?

The "unseen" side was invented to prey on people's fears. For the benefit of the authors, just see who is making the most money off of promoting the "bad fluoride conspiracy".

I don't know much about the "brain sedative" you are speaking of, but I'm sure fluoride injected into the body would be harmful.

I read before about the mechanism of action in Rats, but to even compare rat poison to water fluoridation is fallacious. The concentrations are way different.

People get too hung up on the fact that things they ingest are poisonous at high doses. I don't see how this is of any relevance, since it also applies to water.

Chemtrails over Beechworth last week, it's nearly everyday lately crazy times!!!! BTW time on digital cam was out add 13 hours and thats when pic was taken... date is correct

reply to post by Uncinus


research research ppl... EXPERTS have stated a contrail evaporates in approx 5 mins and you cannot see it...... ANY trail that remains longer than that and balloons out into a cloud looking formation IS A CHEMTRAIL..... Your obviously reading the "facts" on the paghes these dodgy governments want you to believe rather than the REAL truth!!!!! Why are you so scared to look into things properly and accept your gettin screwed over in soooooooo many ways...

reply to post by debz81


and THEN YOU CANNOT SEE IT I mean to type sorry...

Originally posted by debz81
research research ppl... EXPERTS have stated a contrail evaporates in approx 5 mins and you cannot see it......

No they haven't. See my sig.

Find one expert that says that contrails always evaporate in 5 min.

Originally posted by debz81
reply to post by Uncinus

 

research research ppl... EXPERTS have stated a contrail evaporates in approx 5 mins and you cannot see it...... ANY trail that remains longer than that and balloons out into a cloud looking formation IS A CHEMTRAIL..... Your obviously reading the "facts" on the paghes these dodgy governments want you to believe rather than the REAL truth!!!!! Why are you so scared to look into things properly and accept your gettin screwed over in soooooooo many ways...

What "EXPERTS" have said this? You should not make up things like that, in order to promote the chemtrail religion.

Originally posted by debz81
reply to post by Uncinus

 

research research ppl... EXPERTS have stated a contrail evaporates in approx 5 mins and you cannot see it......

which experts are those?

I've never seen anything that looks like serious science that makes such a claim - just people like you asserting it to be true, without providing any backup.

however I have seen papers that say your experts are wrong - like this one -

Young contrails (less than about 50 minutes) and weak contrails are too small to be sensed by the satellites,
and therefore are typically not identified. Older contrails (greater than 2.5 hours) have begun to
lose their linear features, and so would also not be identified with confidence (Duda, 2003).

- from section 3, Results

reply to post by debz81

Your obviously reading the "facts" on the paghes these dodgy governments want you to believe rather than the REAL truth!!!!!

So what is the real truth, because I am really interested in knowing the truth?

No seriously, I would love to know as would a many of other members.

What subject are they experts in? Is it in any way related to aviation?