It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


After Britain, US considers Libya rebel embassy

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:05 PM

WASHINGTON — The United States said Wednesday it was reviewing a request by Libya's rebels to open an embassy in Washington, following Britain which expelled diplomats from Moamer Kadhafi's regime.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the rebel National Transitional Council on Tuesday submitted a formal request to open what the United States would consider Libya's embassy to the United States.

Toner indicated that the United States was sympathetic to the request -- major powers recognized the rebels as Libya's legitimate representatives this month -- but needed to sort out practicalities such as accreditation.

"They did send an official request regarding the reopening of their embassy and we're reviewing that request. And we'll work through these issues," Toner told reporters.

Ali Aujali, who was accredited as Libya's ambassador, defected from the Kadhafi regime in February as violence erupted and affiliated himself with the National Transitional Council.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague on Wednesday invited the council to appoint an ambassador and expelled remaining diplomats loyal to Kadhafi.

After his announcement, rebel supporters unfurled the red, black and green flag of the Libyan opposition outside the embassy where the regime's green flag still flew.

In Tripoli, Kadhafi's deputy foreign minister Khaled Kaaim denounced Britain's move as "irresponsible, illegal and in violation of British and international laws."

Britain and France have spearheaded the campaign against Kadhafi's regime launched in March, when the United Nations approved action to protect civilians.

Correct me if im wrong but I thought the rebel army was comprised of Al-Qaeda militants? I'm confused are they friends or foes?

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:08 PM
reply to post by Digital_Reality

Given the fact that the UK does negociate and conseed to terrorists demands I see no supprise in this.

The UK give the Irish terrorist groups seats to run the local government there.

Why would they not negociate and conseed to the Libyan terrorest's demands either?

You also forget that the main support behind those terrorist groups in Libya doing their dirty work by proxy, is the US and UK themselves and they stand to gain from it, so why not give them what they want?
edit on 28-7-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:14 PM
I was thinking the same thing.

Also, since he no longer rules his country, his son does, and he holds no political position anymore, they still want him to step down.

From what, life?

new topics

log in