It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by ShogunAssassinsAgain? You unfortunately, may never get it. So your telling me the same people who can't tell whether it's gonna' rain TOMORROW, are projecting what's gonna' happen years from now! The point you are missing is this: Krakatoa's eruption in the 1880's changed the weather around the world, yet you believe man can prevent an unseen catastrophe. We are not as powerful as you think. Worry about what you can control, and quit telling me what's good for me.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
reply to post by anon72
So the issue may be delayed for a few generations then, but that doesn't mean forget about it...
I was never a fan of the cap/trade thing overall, it seems like its just the proverbial finger stuck in the dam solution when what we need is a totally different dam...
Technology developed is the answer...a super tree of sorts and overall climate stablization technology being seriously invested in...not just slowing down one of the factors, but reversing it.
The best line the right can have on this is not to deny its even happening...it is, get over it, but to instead try to solve the issue verses just slow it down...the left is saying slowing it down will somehow solve it, and that is flawed also.
CERN Director General Rolf-Dieter Heuer told Welt Online that the scientists should refrain from drawing conclusions from the latest experiment. "I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them," Heuer told veteran science editor Nigel Calder. "That would go immediately into the highly political arena of the climate change debate. One has to make clear that cosmic radiation is only one of many parameters." The unusual "gagging order" could have been issued because the results of CLOUD are really, really boring, speculates Calder. Another conclusion is that that the experiment invites a politically unacceptable hypothesis on climate.
Originally posted by MasterGemini
Its that CONTROL mentality that keeps getting in the way here. Are you aware that the climate on Earth changed many times in the past before humans were here?
Humans play a part just like bacteria and kangaroos. Its just nothing at all like you think.
Humans are less then 7% of less than 30% of the supposed problem with C02.
Of course no one talks about the abnormal sun cycle or wildfires or volcanoes because that would kill the regulations and control measures over people that governments so desperately want.
Not man made, stop clowning yourself.
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by ShogunAssassinsAngry? How about fed the f up with activists trying to save the world on my dime. Good luck with your crusade, but you can expect me to not sit back and let the tree huggers ruin what's left of a free country.