For the last time, Qaddafi doesn't run Libya, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 11:04 AM by confreak
reply to post by auraelium


Qaddafi's son doesn't run the country either, once again, go learn the system before making ignorant statements. Actually, I thought the MSM was only about twisting and out of context news, but it looks like they are about out right lies is well, his son doesn't hold any official position in the Libyan governing system either.

Saif al-Islam's Wikipedia page:


Saif is the president of the Libyan National Association for Drugs and Narcotics Control (DNAG). In 1997, he founded the official charity, the Gaddafi International Foundation for Charity Associations, which has intervened in various hostage situations involving Islamic militants and the crisis of the HIV trial in Libya and the resulting European Union-Libyan rapprochement.

Speaking in Sabha on August 20, 2008, Saif said that he would no longer involve himself in state affairs. He noted that he had previously "intervene[d] due to the absence of institutions",[11] but said that he would no longer do so. He dismissed any potential suggestion that this decision was due to disagreement with his father, saying that they were on good terms. He also called for political reforms within the context of the Jamahiriya system and rejected the notion that he could succeed his father, saying that "this is not a farm to inherit".[11]


They are forcefully trying to paint a Kingdom governing system in Libya, this is a blatant lie, the Libyan system is unique, and there is probably only one journalist who actually talked about, the rest kept it zipped, probably from orders of their board members who are connected to Western Governments.

This is a complete disinfo.

Here's the only journalist who actually talks about the Libyan governing system, and he admits also that there is a clear disinfo going on, and this isn't recent, this is from long time ago when we didn't have flat screen TVs.

edit on 28-7-2011 by confreak because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 11:48 AM by confreak
reply to post by Thundersmurf


The question remains, through out this crisis, has the media ever mentioned, or taken a portion of its time to discuss how the Libyan governing system works? I have not seen any, if there was one, I must have missed it. I haven't seen it in Al-Jazeera, BBC, VOA, Washington Times, Fox News...

It has never been discussed, and the media has never admitted that Qaddafi doesn't hold any position in the Libyan government. This is how they create false reality, and I'm happy that I caught on.

For god sakes it works, and I shouldn't blame others for getting fooled over and over again because it works.

This is really disturbing, if they can create false reality to fool us over and over again, in order for us to rally behind their wars of bloodshed and destruction, what hope do we have, we will just continue getting fooled and will continue having blood of innocent women and children in our hands.

How many fell for Iraq pretext lies?


reply posted on 29-7-2011 @ 12:18 AM by confreak
reply to post by incrediblelousminds


They say if you don't want to believe something, no amount of evidence is enough to make you believe. And if you want to believe something, no amount of evidence is enough to make you disbelieve.

That is a saying that came to my mind when I read your latest comment. I have learnt throughout my discussion and debates that sometimes I have to just leave it at that.

Notice you didn't talk about any information given in the video, do you know why?



reply posted on 29-7-2011 @ 06:37 AM by Thundersmurf
reply to post by confreak


You're totally right. The Lybian people have spent a ong time shaping and creating their unique governmental system, but not once has it been mentioned on the news. Even a lot the guys at work who are usually switched on are backing NATO.

It is sad to see how easily the publics opinion can be shaped. I really hope we can get the message out there. Not sure what the impact of the rebel leaders death is going to have. I'm sure they'll blame it on el Presidente Qaddafi, 'ruler of Lybia'.

Peace


reply posted on 30-7-2011 @ 01:53 PM by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by confreak
reply to post by incrediblelousminds


They say if you don't want to believe something, no amount of evidence is enough to make you believe. And if you want to believe something, no amount of evidence is enough to make you disbelieve.


Nonetheless, you have not provided much information. You made a post with NO REFERENCES< and then when pressed offered a youtube video with one guy's opinion.

Please, more sources. Just because Gadaffi, who has been in charge since 1969, doesnt call himself 'dictator' doesnt mean he isnt.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



No introduction, but strange Claim is this for real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
Aspects of disinformation, some nuts and bolts.
  Posted 19 days ago with 1 member flags
Why Syria Makes Me Upset
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Really bad hoax video of drone allegedly flying over US?
  Posted 12 days ago with 1 member flags
The Case of the Missing Terrorists (or Who is Jose Rodriguez?)
  Posted 12 days ago with 1 member flags