The No-Kids-Allowed Movement is Spreading, page 35
Pages: <<  32    33    34    35    36  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 55 times


reply posted on 18-8-2011 @ 04:55 PM by research100
sw that is some story, that is the kind of parent we are talking about, the way she handled the situation, what did the child learn from that, how to be rude and disrespectful, that's what

I am a mother, my children are grown up now. I like children. I have seen my share of well behaved children and I have gone over to their tables and complimented the families and thanked them and that I enjoyed my meal.

there have been times where a baby is fussing and not stopping and they took them out ti take care of them.

I have seen parents take their children out side and run off some energy so they could calm down.

But there have been times where parent just totally ignored the child, RUNNING AROUND, I have seen this at crowded restaurants where this is a danger to patrons ,servers ,and the child. The library and the store....especially the store..running full speed again and again...I loudly tell them"this is a store not a playground" because when I would say something to the parent, they do nothing....

we involved a manager a couple of time in at restaurants as a last resort ....they need to know if children are running such amok that it requires their attention.

I would like to know the back story of these places that are banning children this could not have been a first step for them, I would like to hear what exactly happened before passing judgement on them.

Why do some kids run in these places??? my friend though maybe they think because it is ok to run around in chucky cheese, that it is okay to do it in other places.....
edit on 18-8-2011 by research100 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-8-2011 @ 01:31 PM by Mach5
reply to post by SprocketUK



You my friend, are terribly correct. But really, a ban is better than someone getting royally pissed off and beating said child. no shirt, no shoes, no manners, no service.

Video for you



At :27 - You startled the Witch!
edit on 21-8-2011 by Mach5 because: That misplaced comma was ticking me off a tad.



reply posted on 23-8-2011 @ 04:33 PM by sensairich
reply to post by laiguana



personally i would blame the government etc for putting the fear into the parents that there will be repurcussions if they discipline there children, something is seriously wrong with todays society,children should be disciplined when they do wrong and why have we the parents etc ever let things come to this,talk about police state



reply posted on 24-8-2011 @ 02:43 AM by Gravity215
Originally posted by unityemissions
This movement is obviously tue result of social failures.

People don't parent their children well, and community members don't speak out and inform these incompetent parents.

Instead of the community calling out the few who deserve it, all children are denied.

It's pathetic, really.

Next time you see a whiny child, talk to the parents.

If they're incompetent, blast em!

You might just save society the horror of having yet another narcissistic scumbag to deal with.


The problem in society is simply that parents no longer parent. Society has told everybody they are children and never grow up and the world is a play ground. When you have children you have to keep working because the cost of living is so high instead of one parent staying home to actually parent.

What do people do, childcare from 3 months of age. 3 year old kinder, 4 year old kinder, then on to school.

Strangers are raising the majority of children in the western world. This is why third world countries have much better family structure and respectful children on average.

Home schooled children who's mother or father left work to care for their kids from birth, although severely punished financially, in most cases turn out to be less self obsessed greedy me me me little brats and far more altruistic than the mean.

This is also the reasoning behind nanny state type collectivist obsession that seems to be going on in the world today, but thats a whole other kettle of fish.


reply posted on 27-8-2011 @ 09:06 AM by ScorpioSyndrome
As a parent of a 4 year old myself, I'm kind of offended that someone else is telling me where I can and where I cannot take my kid. If he's well behaved, I don't see a problem. BUT I do agree to an EXTENT!

For example I was just at the movies with some friends to watch Final Destination 5 3D and two couples brought their kids in to see it. The first couple brought in a toddler and a baby. That I disagree with. Who brings a baby to a movie that is not ment for kids? If it was Cars, that I could understand. It's a kids movie! But this was not a childrens movie so we had to listen to a crying baby. Then the toddler kept getting up to walk and peered over our chairs looking at us and trying to talk to us. The parents never did anything but giggle. We couldn't be rude to the kid because it wasn't her fault. But my friends did make loud enough remarks that it was rude to bring a child especially if they couldn't be quiet. To leave them home!

The other couple who brought in their son who was probably around 8. He was well behaved so that didn't bother us.

What I'm saying is there are places for children, then there are places not ment for children. If there is a high scale restaurant that wants to ban kids, fine. If a place like Olive Garden (that is a bit fancy but not much) wants to ban kids, I might be a little upset because personally whenever I've taken my son there he acts fine. He's never acted up. If a place that I regulary go to, who has kids menus and booster seats, wants to ban them, then I would be highly upset. They would definitely be losing money. If I want to go out to dinner every once in a while with my son, he shouldn't always have to eat fast food. He likes his corn and broccoli to! I know, shocker.

Grocery store? How can you honestly ban kids from a grocery store? That's ludicrous. I shouldn't even have to explain why!

Airplanes.... I don't fly but it would make sense to have a no kids section... then a family section. No harm, no foul. But you can't ban kids because what happens if you have family across the ocean or country and someone is dieing? You can't leave your child alone, you can't always get a sitter and you can't always take a car (too far, won't cross oceans or isn't in that good of condition.) That's only one example why parents bring their kids. It's not always some selfish reason.

Bottom line, teach your kids respect and manners. That is a PARENTS job! Even the best of parents though will have moments where their child acts up for whatever reason. It doesn't mean you ban them from every place. Personally, if I'm somewhere and my son starts acting up and you see I am trying everything to get him to calm down (reasoning, disciplining, whatever... just some examples) I would love for someone else to walk up to him and talk to him, or make funny faces or crack a joke because I know my son. He would end up listening. He gets shy around strangers and if a stranger walked up to him and did that he would be like and cut it out. If all else fails, I'll leave!

Now I know most of these people in this forum are talking about ignorant lazy parents and I agree but I am just showing... I had my son when I was 20. I'm not like that but my son still has his moments. So all of a sudden if my child acts and you happen to see it, I'm a bad parent? Some of the people who have commented in this forum really need to grow up. It's not fair to ban children everywhere like that. If it's getting that bad, then if they are foolish enough to try and ban children then they should be wiser to make parents go to a parenting class or something.
edit on 27-8-2011 by ScorpioSyndrome because: misspellings

Pages: <<  32    33    34    35    36  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 95 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 68 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 7 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags