It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cecilofs
Originally posted by SamuelisHeaven and hell are inside you. They are merely two different ways of descibing your dream world. The message that we haven't grasped yet is that you create your heaven or hell simply with the way that you choose to think!
QFT! The way I see it, we've created Hell on earth and now its time to create Heaven instead.
I am an INFP too so I can relate to a lot of what you've said...not pouring milk in the kettle though I have also been told that I am an indigo and the idea resonates with me but I don't fully buy into it, partially because it is a bit of an ëgo trap" so to speak. If the Indigos are real, I don't think they are only INFP and certainly not blonde-haired/blue-eyed like a lot of people believe.
I'm trying to maintain my positivity but its hard being submerged in a world full of negativity. I also can't see any way atm to be completely self-sufficient and not tied into the system through debt. I just don't think its possible atm, which shows how much "TPTB" have planned this all out.
Anyway, I know it'll all turn out fine. I just hope that I can find my place in this world before too long - its been eluding me for too long now
I don't think I got the Lady Gaga thing, unless you are alluding to either her being representative of the feminine energyor a pawn for TPTB.
I do agree about the feminine energy though. The world has been out of balance for a while and it is slowly rebalancing. This happens on all levels simultaneously because Äs above, so below". I think its a good thing but it is annoying when the pendulum swings back the other way and males become discriminated against - this is by no means the norm but there are examples of it around the place. Examples being custody rights of children after a divorce, or any feminine hygiene commercial. Women tend to fob it off because Ïts about time you got some of your own medicine". But as you said, if you fight fire with fire you just get more fire. Its time to forgive and move on.
My life's journey over the last decade or so has been to rebalance these energies within myself. I was trying to conform to the masculine stereotype and went so far as suppressing and torturing my feminine side, but slowly I have learned to be more accepting of those energies as a part of myself. I have been amazed at things that I know intuitively for example, even though modern science says its impossible, or just a coincidence. I'm not the most masculine male but not incredibly feminine either - I am just more open to my intuitive and emotional side now. I think this is an important journey for all people of all genders - lest we all just conform to stereotypes.
Still, I don't have any special powers yet, but I am eagerly awaiting the day they begin to manifestedit on 28-7-2011 by Cecilofs because: (no reason given)
Actually - - there have been controlled studies that show certain people have a higher rate of paranormal abilities.
You can never find those real clinical studies online - - - I guess they are just not as much fun as slamming people.
If someone does have an ability - - it will be ONE. There's a list of different abilities. You only get impressions - - then you have to interpret them.
you may ask for proof all you want but you dont even have a definition of what proof might be or look like because you are bound by convention and mathematics and manmade expressions of natural reality. /quote]
The main problem might be that you have no idea what science does. You make claims of some super fast learning, yet your posts are clumsy at best, and full of misspellings.
You like to refer to science but you are far from scientific minded
Here you are telling us all some false tale about an alien abduction. You claim some fast learning and yet you write like a pre-teen.
Of allof the poorly written paragraphs in your post this takes the cake for beign bad.
You may just find yourself at the uncomfortable end of a reality gradient that you may not like,science has never and will never create anything new,simply copy to the best of the scientists abilitys a "picture"or an interpretation of a natural process,it is religous lunacy that feeds science with this predetermined idea that they can create things that are new and this is because the church is the entity that popularised science in the first place,when they felt they couldnt find the answers to their questions from within themselves they sought the answers from outside of themselves,and science has continued to seek what they at the time consider to be fair representations of these answers according to the learned ability of the time.
It's a run on sentence with no direction. You don't appear to know the difference between science and engineering. You have no idea what scientists do. You have no idea what is new or not.
It still doesnt change the fact that your claims for scientific evidence are hollow and dependant on the current political view of science itself as a recognised entity. /quote]
That's not true. That's a false statement occasionally made by charlatans.
So listen peabrain stop picking on my spelling and grammer and evaluating my education,knowledge or lack thereof,
You are the one claiming to be so educated. I see no one else in this thread making such a claim. You are the one that made a claim which is so obvious a falsehood.
we all notice each others strengths and weaknesses but we decline to comment on them unless we are feeling defensive
You are the one that made the claim. You made a claim about some special education. No one else has made such a claim. But you obviously are not capable of writing in a manner consistent with your claims.
And as much as you claim an affiliation to some sort of scientific reasoning in the process of your though formation,it is painfully obvious you have no scientific background
I have no made such a claim. Give me an example. Tell us all why you claim this? I am calling your bluff on this one.
peabrain I learned more than you know right now before I was ten years old
Here you are again claiming some special education yet your posts tell otherwise. Your flawed writing tells us all that you are not as you claim.
A man who simply sits in the library or surfs the internet in a committed functional way will become an educated
Not necessarily true. It might happen. It might not. There are several important missing elements here.
a man who stops learning at college age and then becomes an automaton to science or industry or social entities,will become a well trained and potentially well paid man,but very far from an educated man
This is in conflict with the first part of your sentence, or can't you see that?
you my little friend use science as your shield of shining steel to deflect realities that make you uncomfortable,you even use it as a basis to evaluate other peoples levels of education or learnedness
As this poorly constructed run on sentence progresses we see once again that you do not understand what science does.
Science is a method. Science is not a "shield to deflect realities". Science is not a means of interaction.
There are scientific methods of evaluating people to understand their situation from health to education to sensory capabilities to intelligence to a range of other issues. I certainly don't need to use science to see that you are not what you claim to be.
science is a religous inspired sham
Thanks for showing us yet again that you have no idea what science is or does.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by newcovenant
I suggest you read the posts and see that this person is not able to handle even basic elementary writing despite the claims of super-learning.
You need to look at the evidence instead of mentioning the latest fad in improving retention.