It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
House Republicans on Wednesday morning were calling for the firing of Republican Study Committee staffers after they were caught sending e-mails to conservative groups urging them to pressure GOP lawmakers to vote against a debt proposal from Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).
Infuriated by the e-mails from Paul Teller, the executive director of the RSC, and other staffers, members started chanting “Fire him, fire him!” while Teller stood silently at a closed-door meetings of House Republicans.
“It was an unbelievable moment,” said one GOP insider. “I’ve never seen anything like it.”
Tea Party Nation leader Judson Phillips called on House Speaker John Boehner "to go" and be replaced by a "Tea Party Speaker of the House" in a blog post Wednesday morning, the same day that Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, said that her group was looking into the same idea.
"Now Boehner is in the process of surrendering again. He is surrendering not to [President] Obama, but to the status quo in Washington," Phillips wrote. "The House passed Cut, Cap and Balance, which would cut $111 billion from the budget. It would cap spending and set a good course for the future."
Speaking on conservative radio host Laura Ingraham’s show this morning, Boehner agreed that failing to raise the limit before the deadline would be devastating, and said the “chaos” plan won’t work when asked by Ingraham what’s motivating the recalcitrant Republicans:
BOEHNER: Well, first they want more. And my goodness, I want more too. And secondly, a lot of them believe that if we get past August the second and we have enough chaos, we could force the Senate and the White House to accept a balanced budget amendment. I’m not sure that that — I don’t think that that strategy works. Because I think the closer we get to August the second, frankly, the less leverage we have vis a vis our colleagues in the Senate and the White House.
Originally posted by jam321
One big circus playing out in front of the world.
Maybe they should look up the word COMPROMISE and replace the my way or highway attitude.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by jam321
Why should they? It's their right to express any views they choose and if they are adamant on certain issues and it costs them elections that's their decision. I don't think you should say how political organizations should think.
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by jam321
Why should they? It's their right to express any views they choose and if they are adamant on certain issues and it costs them elections that's their decision. I don't think you should say how political organizations should think.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by jam321
Why should they? It's their right to express any views they choose and if they are adamant on certain issues and it costs them elections that's their decision. I don't think you should say how political organizations should think.
Because "my way or the highway" is not a democracy, it is a dictatorship.
Originally posted by newcovenant
Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by jam321
Why should they? It's their right to express any views they choose and if they are adamant on certain issues and it costs them elections that's their decision. I don't think you should say how political organizations should think.
Because "my way or the highway" is not a democracy, it is a dictatorship.
Why should they?
if they are adamant on certain issues and it costs them elections that's their decision.
I don't think you should say how political organizations should think.
just like dems "compromised" for a partisan vote for obama care?
Whether it effects us next week or 5 years from now, our debt is out of control, our government is too big and spends irresponsibly, and the bubble is going to pop.
And not only that, but pretty much every plan proposed so far in the past few weeks still means 10+T more debt in the next decade, regardless of how much they are saying to "cut" in the timeframe.
Tea party members were voted in for one major reason: because establishment members on both sides of the aisle keep screwing everything up.
Deficit commission’s Simpson calls US seniors the ‘greediest generation’
Wyoming Republican Alan Simpson has a pretty low opinion of the people that have paid into Social Security all their lives and now need something back.
The co-chair of President Barack Obama's bipartisan deficit commission lashed out at seniors Wednesday because they are unhappy with his ideas for reducing the deficit by cutting Social Security benefits while reducing corporate taxes.
its going to hurt, and hurt bad, but it will be less painful if we default now, not when we double our debt down the road and leave it to our kids to deal with.
Alot of people on here whine about the two party system but then complain when it looks like there might be a third party acting different from the other two parties. Why have third parties if you expect them to act like the republicans or democrats?