It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The choices facing the 112th Congress come at a time when the federal government’s debt has increased dramatically in the past few years and when large annual budget deficits are projected to continue indefinitely under current laws or policies. Federal budget deficits will total $7 trillion over the next decade if current laws remain unchanged, CBO projects. If certain policies that are scheduled to expire under current law are extended instead, deficits may be much larger.
This report presents 105 illustrative options that would reduce projected budget deficits. As in past reports, the options cover an array of policy areas—from defense to energy to entitlement programs to provisions of the tax code. The budgetary effects shown for most options span the 10 years from 2012 to 2021
Introduce Minimum Out-of-Pocket Requirements Under TRICARE For Life
Reduce the Growth in Appropriations for the Department of Defense
Cap Increases in Military Basic Pay
Link Initial Social Security Benefits to Average Prices Instead of Average Earnings
Raise the Earliest Eligibility Age for Social Security
Raise the Full Retirement Age in Social Security
Repeal the Individual Health Insurance Mandate
Lower the Loan Limits on Mortgages Guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Increase Guarantee Fees Charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Increase Payments by Tenants in Federally Assisted Housing
i dont support raising taxes when the government has time and time again has proven itself incapable of spending what tax revenue they already collect wisely.
we are to blame here as much as government we know whats wrong and we keep doing the same thing over we know whats wrong but we never fix it and we elect people who makes it worse.
i am a proponent of a smaller less powerful government with less people which means less people doing the abusing.
and no if they actually did their jobs they might deserve job security as it stands now all they give a flying fig about is their own greed and lust for power and control.
Nobody wants to pay more taxes, but a very small 0.5% tax increase on everything but groceries and medicine that could ONLY be used to pay on the deficit would be okay with me.
The question is how small is small?
Cut everything except infrastructure maintenance, practical (non politicized) scientific research, basic administration, emergency funding (rainy day type funds for large natural or manmade catastrophes that may prove too big for 1 state to handle). Let the states handle their own affairs, let people vote with their feet. Allow a true, free market that does not grant favors to those that pay the politicians. Promote self sufficiency and self reliance. No more federal reserve, no more debt limit problems.
All welfare recipients should give an itemized reciept of all purchases made with taxpayer money and if nonessential items are bought, that amount will be deducted the next pay period.
Tariffs would be instant tax revenue for the government, and at the same time bringing jobs here as it would be cheaper to employ and sell items here than move to China and ship it here
It's impossible to raise capital in the United States, and you cannot compete against China because land is free, water is free, electricity is sold far below production cost, there are no environmental restrictions, capital is freely available, and they can (and do) copy anyone's technology. How is this free trade?
Do we still have the infrastructure and resources to manufacture things here? Got a quote for you my friend
China has a leg up on "rare earth" resources....but there is no reason we can't be sufficient. The point is..we are a huge buyer of Chinese products.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by David9176
China has a leg up on "rare earth" resources....but there is no reason we can't be sufficient. The point is..we are a huge buyer of Chinese products.
I recall awhile back, there were reports of China hoarding these resources.
As for tariffs, I often wonder why the US continues to push for FTA's. Does the US benefit that much from them?