It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What the...What was That? UFO spotted in LIVE NBC News SkyCam at Fort Worth, TX

page: 21
115
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   
reply to post by OneEleven
 


That is a bit of an exaggeration don't you think, jumping from interesting video to the return of the Annuaki. That my friend is the epitome of disinformation, make the claim sound so wild and unbelievable and totally discredit the opinion of someone else. Take the focus off of the debatable material and focus on the reputation of another person. Should we question your motives now?




posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   
If it was a bug it would appear bigger I would think. I would say this is a genuine clip of a UFO.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by dilly1
reply to post by caladonea
 


Is that really you , in your avatar? cause your smoking HOTTTTT!


No...that is not me in my avatar .....I choose the photo from an avatar website....however...she could be my twin.

Also....what do you think about the UFO spotted? I think it is either a piece of a comet or a UFO.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
DFW-er here to save the day!!!
=D

seriously though, I really do live in the DFW area...
and no, I won't get more specific because all of you will stalk me
lol


I have found the answer!
SEE 1:10-1:20




"And some huge meteor's like,
well, f*ck that."






posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 

Its called a moth.

Since the camera also has a light, the moth was attracted to the light.

Welcome to national geographic.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Section31
 


Moths are neither that fast or agile.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by PW229
 


Nice...thank you for interjecting some well needed humor
into the thread.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by PW229
 


Nice...thank you for interjecting some well needed humor
into the thread.


As I said in the post, it is not meant to be frivolous and something I didn't say is that it is most certainly not meant to be disparaging.

I merely ask a simple question and I can see no way of answering it, is it small and near or large and far away.

Thank you for seeing it in the way it was intended.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Section31
reply to post by burntheships
 

Its called a moth.

Since the camera also has a light, the moth was attracted to the light.

Welcome to national geographic.


I think we have cleared it up that there is no light on the tower cam.

And here ya go, a video that demonstrates moths at night, to a light.



I know I know when aerospace engineers go looking for a wing model in nature,
they choose moths. Yep....



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by OneEleven
 


That is a bit of an exaggeration don't you think, jumping from interesting video to the return of the Annuaki. That my friend is the epitome of disinformation, make the claim sound so wild and unbelievable and totally discredit the opinion of someone else. Take the focus off of the debatable material and focus on the reputation of another person. Should we question your motives now?


Indeed....i agree with you 100%....not that anything i said was disinformation, but lets look at your claim....

"Make the claim sound so wild and unbelievable and totally discredit the opinion of someone else."

Like taking a video of a moth, "Make the claim sound so wild and unbelievable", by calling it a UFO, and "totally discredit the opinions of someone else", in this case, the Bug opinions, "therefor taking the focus off of the debatable material and focusing on the reputation of another person, in this case, the Bug believers.

Question my motives all you want....I couldn't have said it better myself....

the epitome of disinformation indeed....

"Starred You"

Thank you for that....
edit on 28-7-2011 by OneEleven because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:25 PM
link   
If we just had some very basic info about the video we could glean all kinds of interesting information from it. If only we knew. IF we knew the object's distance from the camera then we could ascertain its size, trajectory, speed and motion. We know none of those things therefore this video must go in the "unexplained" category.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   
It's only my opinion but that definantly does not look like a bug ! Space junk i would definantly agree with if it didn't shoot off in the opposit direction at the last minute.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:35 PM
link   
reply to post by PW229
 


I agree, perhaps if they are able to post the HD format we could even see if
the object does indeed zoom into the cloulds as it appears, and then pulls up.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:47 PM
link   
If this argument has not been solved in twenty odd pages, twenty more won't solve it either.

Bugs, Swamp gas, light defracted off Venus, a searchlight...

Nibiru, Annunaki, Nephilim, Greys, Zetas, Reptoids...

The 'truth' is always directly half of the extreme ends of an argument, this one is no different.

You see what you want to see, that is the nature of preception.

You cannot fill a cup that is already full.

But the wheels keep turning, and these phenomenon will continue to operate outside of what can be quantified.

Nice food for thought, OP. Don't get discouraged by the circus that pops up.

It is how we ATS'ers cope with things we aren't prepared to deal with!



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:50 PM
link   
@ltinycdancerg

LMAO @ that video =]



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by jimnuggits
 


I thought we are all waiting for some kind of professional analysis. Wasn't the footage confiscated or at least turned over for investigation? If it was "confiscated" we can pretty much put it in the TRUE column right there.
They don't confiscate faked UFO footage.



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by rboiATS
 


Glad someone actually noticed my post! =D

Tell me that meteor is not the same one from the skycam footage?!
The motion is identical!!!




posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Meteors skim the edge of the atmosphere all the time. It only hit a sliver of the atmosphere and then went on its way or burned out. It is an optical illusion making it look like it was diving straight down. I sit on my roof all the time watching just such metros each November. I've seen more than one do this very thing.


Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist

Originally posted by SuperiorEd

There are two meteor showers happening this week. Most likely the cause. LINK


Experts are predicting a "celestial traffic jam" in the sky this week. As we gear up for the year's best-known shooting-star event, the annual Perseid meteor shower, another event, the Delta Aquarid meteor shower, may prove more spectacular.



As far as i know there are no Meteors that can perform like this....

You must be delusional!



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by tetsuoatx
 


that`s why it should be an ufo and not a moskito
that`s what they are capable of don`t they?



posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by jimnuggits
 


And here I thought we were having a discussion.



The trolls dont suprise me ...what does though is the fair amount of
people that think its a bug.

Have you seen this bug?



new topics

top topics



 
115
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join