It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davesmart
hi op
there was athread several weeks ago
cant remember what it was called
but the remains of a human was found in a coal mine
coal takes at least 250,000 yrs to form
were lied to left right and center
dave
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
reply to post by OuttaTime
What?! I thought Science was not supposed to consider religious bias!
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
Conventional archaeology generally accepts almost as fact that civilisation began with the dawn of the Sumer around 3000BC. Yet countless discoveries have proved this date wrong and suggests that humans could have began civilisation hundreds of thousands of years ago. This notion is seen as anathema to Mainstream archaeologists and they denounce it violently without reason or proper understand.
For example, the common defence these mainstream archaeologists have about numerous ancients sites like the Pyramids, Tiwanaku, Stone Henge etc, being precisely built to mimic star constellations and the Precession of the Equinox, as just "coincidence". I asked the Dean of Archaeology at my local university about this and he also said they are just "coincidences". Explain to me just how the layout of Stonehenge mimics the solar system as a just a "coincidence"???
Whats more amazing is that most of these theories are hardly ever looked into seriously except by those troll defenders of mainstream archaeology around the internet.
I mean why does the mainstream try so very hard to suppress mankind's origins from us? So WHAT that mankind's civilisations could be older than just 10,000 years? Its not like its going to affect anyone!
I doubt that anyone would even care if some civilisation origins are traced back hundreds of thousands of years ago, but currently the very thought of that is like Kryptonite to Mainstream Archaeologists.
Can anyone please explain to me whats there to hide? What are they even achieving by suppressing mankind's origins?
Just lack of evidence to support the theory of ancient civilisations
Explain to me just how the layout of Stonehenge mimics the solar system as a just a "coincidence"???
I mean why does the mainstream try so very hard to suppress mankind's origins from us?
Can anyone please explain to me whats there to hide? What are they even achieving by suppressing mankind's origins?