It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree. It was a faked false flag. Occam's razor dictates.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by pshea38
That large hand is the only thing in the original OP that looks remotely strange. The people in the first video could have been in shock, but it could have been fake too.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by pshea38
Personly I see nothing wrong with any of this...and I'm quite surprised anyone else would. The first part about the multiple shots all looking exactly the same is incredibly simple to explain. It was simply the same shot....used over and over again. Most likely a still from the video. Footage of an event shot as it happens is incredibly rare....the video was likely used over and over again...with slight alterations (cropping....color saturation...etc) simply to make it look different. Nothing odd about that...News agencies do that all the time. In fact it would be FAR MORE suspicious if they indeed had a multitude of shots from different angles! That would imply they knew it was going to happen!
As for the audio overlapping the video edit in the second clip.....Are you serious? That's one of the most normal video editing techniques there is. I can't imagine you've never seen that before! It simply makes for a more seamless video....the guy who took the footage probably was startled by the boom and turned his camera toward the ground....still capturing the boom, sound...in order to make it work, all one has to do is cut out the unneeded video section...while leaving the audio, and replace the video with a part slightly farther along. Then one can subtlely fade from the old audio to the new....keeping the 'boom' seamless. It's an incredibly simple technique that I learned to do back in High School on anolog video editing equipment. Now days it would be done digitally ......but you don't even need a computer. I could literally edit that together in about five minutes on my iphone!
The last still picture was the worst of all....I sincerly didn't see anything photoshoped or even odd about it. Even assuming it was...what possible reason would someone have for (as an example) replacing a guys hand with an oversized one?!?! That doesn't even make sense as being a bad photoshop....assuming you dropped the image of the guy into the frame...why would you replace his hand?!?! It's just a bizarre idea to even suggest....not that it looked odd to me, mind you. It's just a normal photo...if you look at any normal photo you'll find things that seem odd.....It's a 2d representation of a 3d world. Things get distorted. Not unusual at all.
In all of these clips there was only one thing that looked even slightly odd to me.....and that was the smoke. However, it is important to remember...simply because something looks odd doesn't mean it's faked. In fact a faker would have made the smoke look more uniform. It doesn't take that much talent to make regular looking smoke,...what makes the footage more believable is that the smoke looks a bit odd. In real life, thing don't always look like they do in the movies my friend.....Things often look a tiny bit odder than you'd expect in the real world...but it would be madness to suggest every odd looking thing is a sign of a conspiracy!edit on 28-7-2011 by bhornbuckle75 because: Spelling error....prob more too...I'm sleepy!
Originally posted by Zamini
reply to post by pshea38
Ha! Because i have been told so by proven liars and manipulators?
Alright, that means you are either trolling or mentally unstable. Mods should have a look into it.
Originally posted by Ctankep
First of all Flag for you for being brave enough to bring this up as I feel after other world events this type of questioning will be an automatic for some.
The picture with the two EMT's and the photographer carrying the the blonde. Those feet ARE added in!! I do a lot of digital manipulations as part of my profession and over the years I have an eagle eye for things that look out of place.
1. The angle of the feet and where the toes point are out of place with the angle / position of her legs.
2. They're also a lighter tone than her skin color ( I know people will think about not having a tan on her feet etc but it's more than just the tan. The texture / pattern also is wrong)
3. And the guy who appears to be holding her legs....Actually is not.he seems to be holding a jacket instead. in proportion to his hands and the angle of her legs she would have to have some seriously deformed legs for him to hold them.
4. And if you had a pair of legs clamped between your thighs wouldn't you expect some sort of shadow to be cast on them.....I don't see any.
I shall now carry on lurking in the shadows
[Posted by Tufa]
Once upon a time in Norway, a young girl meet with two police officers and a press photographer in a photo studio. After applying a dose of ketchup on the young girl, a green-screen photo is taken where the girl is being carried away. It is important, for the emotional impact, to include children into the story, so the relative probability of finding young children in front of the government building, compared to politicians and journalists, is ignored. It simply don't work carrying a politician!
We then need a background photo. The photo is blurred so it looks like focus is only good in the front of the picture. The foreground action with the girl is now painted in.
A thin cut-line (A) can be seen to the left of the press photographer in the brown shirt. The hair of the lady-police (B) works rather well; the problem is that the background should shine through the hair. A little white spot is fully acceptable. The flap over the man's face (C) is difficult to see, if you are not checking for errors, and who on earth would do that!? The square ting on the left shoulder of the man, is a window in the background.
The picture with the hurt girl is a composite.
(A) cut-line at the back of the photographer's shirt
(B) Almost OK hair
(C) The face of the man was painted over.
Viewing the finished composite, we note that the left and right concrete obstacles are significantly lighter compared to the middle one (between the legs of the two police men). (If you cannot see the right obstacle, use "Show picture" ADMIN: there is a CSS in the livingroom thread).
The perspective can be a problem, and we see in the resulting composite that the by-standers in the back becomes a little too big compared to the foreground action. Since the background action is completely separate, the ladies at the back is not looking at the policemen, the half-dead girl, or the press photographer snapping the picture.
[Posted by Simonshack]
Originally posted by Perplexity
This has to be one of the most ridiculous topics I've ever come across on ATS. Sorry, but before you run around blowing the conspiracy whistle you need to have more talking points than "looks a wrong-un" and the the clothing being worn on the scene. I cannot comprehend how someone can think they are busting up a huge conspiracy based on these ridiculous notes. I believe that possibly this terrorist (oh wait can't call a him terrorist because he's a white christian) - ahem, I mean perpetrator, definitely had some help planning and possibly implementing this attack. Other than that there is nothing strange to me about this event, sometimes people are just bad. You need to accept that and stop crying false flag at every single disaster, some of them MAY be just that but you are making this community look pathetic with topics like these. And the Japanese disaster being staged? Give me a break, you've lost any shred of credibility you could have possibly possessed before this topic.
Originally posted by ProphetOfZeal
reply to post by pshea38
As far as the pics go, and the critique the OP posted, this is unnecessary to me, and not a good case to support this obvious false flag event, so disregard this. There's enough evidence elsewhere to show how blatantly obvious this is.
To ANYONE who doesn't understand this was a false flag, and business as usual for the elite then you need to get a reality check. I find it absolutely hilarious and ironic, when the deniers ridicule and mock the people who are actually awake and aware, and try to make us out to be the weirdos.. Quite ironic, and sad. Because some of us understand how this world works, we're not some tight nit group of weirdos. Accept that.
When something is staged doesn't mean people didn't die, doesn't mean they were acting. It means the event was engineered and made possible by the powers that be. If you still don't understand how this world and society works, how we are all controlled and manipulated by our gov and media then I feel bad for you. Just another person who needs to wake up.. Everyone knows this was a false flag. Same M.O., same fishy stuff going on prior to and around it.
The evidence is right there in front of your faces. The DAY BEFORE, they release that article "white americans as most likely terrorists". Days before they run bomb drills.. Sound familar? LOL.. I couldn't believe it when I found that out. And some people still turning a blind eye.. Let me tell you something, in my experience of researching false flags, 9/11 for years now, one thing is for sure, there are NO such things as coincidences, when it comes to the media and "terrorism".
edit on 28-7-2011 by ProphetOfZeal because: (no reason given)edit on 28-7-2011 by ProphetOfZeal because: (no reason given)