It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Anonymous : Make fun of Breiviks manifesto.

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in


posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 02:10 PM
After years of work the first edition of the book of knowlege “2083 – A European Declaration of Insanity” is completed. If you have received this book, you are either one of myformer love monkey's friends or you are the friend of one of my FBI friends. If you are concerned about the future of Western Europe you will definitely find the information both interesting and highly irrelevant.I have spent several years writing, researching, whacking off to transexual porn, and compiling the information and I have spent most of my hard earned funds in this process (in excess of 300 000 Euros). I donot want any compensation for it as it is a gift to you, as a fellow patriotrarc.Much of the information presented in this book of knowledge (3 books) has not been deliberately kept away from the European peoples by our governments and the politically mass strange mediea (MSM). More than 102% of the EU and national parliamentarians and more than 100% of journalists are supporters of European multiculturalism and thereforesupporters of the ongoing DEMOCRACY of Europe; yet, they DO NOT have thepermission of the European peoples to implement these doctrines.The book of knowlege, - “2083 – A European Declaration of Insanity” - documentsthrough more than 1000 pages that the fear of my photoshopped pictures is all but irrational.It covers the following main topics:
The rise of cultural hip hop in Western Europe
Why muslims wanted to get the hell out the middle east and the migration of Western Europe began
The current state of the Western European wet T-SHIRT contest Movements (anti-topless/anti-anti-lesbian)
Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the village people, should move forward in thecoming decades

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 02:21 PM
reply to post by hillynilly

Oh how can that be a bad thing?
I guess nobody can think these pillocks are not dangerous, I am still amused when I imagine those who subscribe to the idiots manifesto reading that. Lots of documents are parodied it doesn't change the fact that the original exists, it just frustrates the efforts of those who want to exalt it and in turn him. That is the danger of the original document, it should be ridiculed because it is ridiculous.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 02:50 PM
If anyone requires an unedited copy of this document in it's original format just say so and I will upload it for you. I downloaded it from the original website when it was still up. After reading most of it I am almost positive that my copy has no editing or censorship.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -George Orwell

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 02:55 PM
I'm good with the sentiment, but find the source odd.

Anonymous routinely harms innocent people in the collateral damage of their criminal activities. Hitting Pay Pal mainly hurts the small businesses using the service who did nothing to anyone. Anonymous is as mad as Breiviks in a different sort of way.

Who elected Anonymous? Petty little Dictators that they are.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 03:04 PM

Here is a link to the document.

"A European Declaration of Independence" is the name of it. It is in DOCX format. It is VERY long. The author refers to it as a compendium and that is how I find it to be as well.

It the link gets removed just let me know and I will reupload it.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 03:49 PM
I don't the agree with his actions but his views expressed in his maifesto were absolutely right and should be highlighted even further due to the fact that what he speaks about in the manifesto is a problem we all face and yet is being ignored by our could be something to do with the fact that they started the problem in the first place.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 04:33 PM

Originally posted by Phantom traveller

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by Hilltaker

Well, imho, this is a crappy thing for them to want to do.

Why change his manifesto? To ridicule him? To what end?

Besides if the real manifesto disappears and some other versions appear they might help him with his defence in the court.His lawyer already is playing the insanity card,they can use the altered manifesto to prove that Breivik was insane and his state of mind was rather questionable when he wrote it.
So instead of going to prison will end up in some mental institution.

Does this anonymous guys think before they act?

No, no and no. Are seriously suggesting that because some people post a false copy of his manifesto that he'll get out of his trial? Your crazy. They're doing this because he shouldn't get his word out. I'm all for this and will be spreading many different versions. He doesn't deserve to get his message out. Or you can take no action and perhaps he'll get his way after all.


posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 04:45 PM
reply to post by Hilltaker

Seems completely stupid to me. Here I thought Anon stood for the right to free speech but when they don't like what some one has to say they attempt to dilute the truth and obscure the original work? It's completely hypocritical on every level. I don't agree with a lot of things I read, but if I were to try and distort those words I would be no better than the powers which distort what they don't like on a grand scale.
edit on 27-7-2011 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 04:47 PM
Whether his manifesto is changed or not, it will have no influence on the outcome of his trial.

The original unchanged one will certainly be used as evidence in court, to give the prosecutors a better look into the twisted and disturb mind of this murderer.


Posted Via ATS Mobile:

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:21 PM
So instead of educating people about the themes contained in the document they want to keep people ignorant? I don't like seeing Anon's adopting the same tactics as the establishment. I'll be keeping my 100% original copy for research purposes, thank you and will share it with anyone who wants a copy.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:30 PM
reply to post by CitizenOne

I have to add, fundamentally changing the substance of the document only serves to reinforce the culture of confusion, uncertainty and fear among the sleeping masses.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:36 PM
reply to post by Hilltaker

I'm with them, he was an idiot, well actually he was kind of smart, but still an idiot.

He didn't kill enemies he killed teens, actually it was a massacre... Then again he'll go down in history for what he did.

We're all working 8-9 hours a day and commute for another 1 or 2 and he's complaining about muslims ? He just proved some christians are just as bad, even worse. The koran allows muslims to kill others, the bible is against it, so in the end he wasn't even a good christian.

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:38 PM
Checksums of the PDF file
MD5 Checksum: 9E72E26916C20481A1F6E4781FD4D505
SHA-1 Checksum: 12DEAE65095B3959E42A27247652073BFE85CC83

Checksums of the docx file.
MD5 Checksum: 7A74E156AEFB45416EA057CE19DFE4E9
SHA-1 Checksum: 66074530DE42BF3B3B38D3D0B1AED1C5868E328B

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 05:39 PM
reply to post by CitizenOne

I don't like seeing Anon's adopting the same tactics as the establishment
fundamentally changing the substance of the document only serves to reinforce the culture of confusion, uncertainty and fear among the sleeping masses.
Well said. I completely agree. I read a good quote the other day, it was something like "Is fighting fire with fire really a good idea?"

posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 09:42 PM

Originally posted by Frater210
reply to post by Hilltaker

Oy, Vey!

These guys are really beginning to reach.

I will be waiting for the Anonymous ice cream trucks to come around this Summer to hand out ice creams and Guy Fawkes masks to all the kiddies.

Do you think they do windows?

Awesome post.

This is just promoting censorship like they always have by using the internet in all the wrong ways to bring about its strict regulation.

In truth, anonymous is only elevating that sick killer by bringing him more undue attention.
Tell people they can't have something or see something and they only want to see it more, now or in the future.
A very stupid move by stupid people to marry their cause to such a heinous act in any way shape or form.
Proves they'll stoop to any level to attempt to forward their agenda.

The only good thing IMO is that this will hasten their demise.
They may get a few cheers from the sheeple that already ddos'd for them and are waiting to get caught but that is it.

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:16 AM
Sounds like anonymous want a job at MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX. To me it seems a bit immature to want to silence information by obscuring it from reality via taking pot shots or distorting the truth. Part of the main reason people like Anders do what they do has more to do with the fact they already feel censored and oppressed from expressing their opinions, for example in the EU a person can get thrown in jail for writing books that question the facts of the Holocaust of WW2.

Anders' book clearly states in no uncertain terms that many will attempt to turn him into the worst thing since Hitler, he fully realizes the enormous pull and control of the media and the willingness of followers of the media like Anonymous to do the "dirty work" of trashing ideas and facts and smearing anyone that espouses them as being "racist" or "hate speech", these are the very reasons Anders choose to act in the manner he did, can't anyone learn?

The first Amendment of the constitution was put in place in order to protect "unpopular speech", even the kind of stupid paranoid comments that come from Democratic politicians who cry "the sky is falling" about the debt ceiling, when in fact nothing of the sort has occured, they merely have forgotten that they are servants of the public and if the public wants a reduced size in government they must accept it. They can call Bohener a bunch of names up and down and all around, make phony polls, talk about how the republican tea parties are "terrorists" and want to "shoot bullets at the president" but in the end most of the public knows they are just passing gas through their mouths, since they cannot listen to an opposing viewpoint to their own they would rather hope as Anonymous seems to hope that people will be so confused or unable to get to the facts of the budget numbers that they will take them seriously as opposed to the reality of reducing the bloated size of the governement.

Anders already was censored and that was why he did what he did, it almost seems like those in the media and Anonymous want it to happen again and again to further their views which most likely if they are young are views that espouse a sort of utopian multicultural fantasy in which all different people love one another and enjoy having no sense of self and identity, but these kinds of ideas were major factors in the development of the hundreds of million murdered during the last century under economic Marxism and still living in a prision of the mind of cultural marxism.

Call Anders what you like, make fun of his ideas all you want, but the ideas were present before he came about and only seem to be spreading even faster as the reality of economic globalism begins to fail. What happens when people lose jobs and the money needed to survive, they lose it, they lose everything, and at the moment Anders seems like a fluke, but in some sense this was the result of Globalism and Neo-liberalism, and his actions represent the death knell for a totally integrated UN and EU. Most of these politician driven platforms depend upon a society ignorant of science and facts and history, those post-modernist walls seem to have started to crumble, regardles of which side of them you maybe sitting upon.

On a final note, let's imagine for a moment you have sequestered a dozen cruise liners and filled them up with Immigrants from India, Africa, Asia and you have decided to park them in the shores of the EU and the USA, what are the odds that those cultures being overrun would appreciate and love multiculturalism then? To me it seems highly likely that if hundreds of millions of Immigrants showed up at either border they would be refused entry, and let's say the reverse were so and we had jewish temples being built all over muslim countries next to sacred places, why does tolerance and anti-racism seem to apply to those of European ancestry, if in the post-modern sense why do we even bother to tolerate muslim and other religions at all? In many ways in islamic countries the infidels would be treated no differnet than how Anders treated "infidels" in his own society, he just has a different belief system than a muslim, but to say they are all extremist for defending their identity seems to ignore the fact that the tolerance facilitates it, even to absurd levels in the west. Religions exist in such a absurd manner today that when a nationalist comes along people forget that the borders are all human creations as well, religions seem to imply they are not human creations and therefore not subject to ridicule or disagreement.

The point being that states were partially designed to protect people from this kind of insanity in the rest of the world, Anders point was to show that they can't even protect themselves let alone protect from being overrun by foreign forces, obviously the idea that everyone wants to protect something has been abandoned and the idea that nothing seems worth protecting has taken hold, since we are all one, but that thinking ignores microbiology and physics in a variety of ways and has led to post-modernist deconstructionist thinking that has fragmented reality for most rather than integrated it at a fundamental scientific level.

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 08:22 AM

I am very happy to see 75 replies in a post I posted.

However, I am sad to see so few flags. I really found the subject interesting and was hoping for this post to come up and be seen by much more folks.

Anyway, thanks for your interest in the post.


posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 09:24 AM
Get off your high horses people, this is not comparable to book burning. This is retaliation. Breivik sees his mass murder of innocent children as promotion for his manifesto. I support this

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 09:47 AM
Important point to add.

If all of the points which you agree with are already out there on the web then agree with them by all means but do not give this persons manifesto credit it does not deserve in this regard. It is his excuse, he was not driven to it, many people feel the same way as him but would never commit such a crime.

This persons name should not be in any way connected with any movement for the betterment of society, that would be like thanking him for his action

Do not agree with HIM about anything, if a point is valid and exists somewhere else then quote someone else. Lest you grow to sympathize with HIM, your sympathy should be reserved for his victims!

Personally I think religion should be banned but I would never condemn every member of any religion, race, anything. Citizens of earth should have the right to live wherever on the planet they want. Religion is a major problem as is the monetary system both of which make peace impossible.

Changing some copies of the manifesto as suggested by Anon is not an attack on free speech as some keep suggesting, it is using free speech to fully disagree with and ridicule a murderer.

posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 09:51 AM
I think most of you forgot or just didnt know.. "We did it for the lulz"

Anonymous is not intended to be some all right, all honest group.. Anon is internet street justice at best, legion at worst!

top topics

<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in