posted on Jul, 28 2011 @ 03:16 AM
Sounds like anonymous want a job at MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX. To me it seems a bit immature to want to silence information by obscuring it from
reality via taking pot shots or distorting the truth. Part of the main reason people like Anders do what they do has more to do with the fact they
already feel censored and oppressed from expressing their opinions, for example in the EU a person can get thrown in jail for writing books that
question the facts of the Holocaust of WW2.
Anders' book clearly states in no uncertain terms that many will attempt to turn him into the worst thing since Hitler, he fully realizes the
enormous pull and control of the media and the willingness of followers of the media like Anonymous to do the "dirty work" of trashing ideas and
facts and smearing anyone that espouses them as being "racist" or "hate speech", these are the very reasons Anders choose to act in the manner he
did, can't anyone learn?
The first Amendment of the constitution was put in place in order to protect "unpopular speech", even the kind of stupid paranoid comments that come
from Democratic politicians who cry "the sky is falling" about the debt ceiling, when in fact nothing of the sort has occured, they merely have
forgotten that they are servants of the public and if the public wants a reduced size in government they must accept it. They can call Bohener a bunch
of names up and down and all around, make phony polls, talk about how the republican tea parties are "terrorists" and want to "shoot bullets at the
president" but in the end most of the public knows they are just passing gas through their mouths, since they cannot listen to an opposing viewpoint
to their own they would rather hope as Anonymous seems to hope that people will be so confused or unable to get to the facts of the budget numbers
that they will take them seriously as opposed to the reality of reducing the bloated size of the governement.
Anders already was censored and that was why he did what he did, it almost seems like those in the media and Anonymous want it to happen again and
again to further their views which most likely if they are young are views that espouse a sort of utopian multicultural fantasy in which all different
people love one another and enjoy having no sense of self and identity, but these kinds of ideas were major factors in the development of the hundreds
of million murdered during the last century under economic Marxism and still living in a prision of the mind of cultural marxism.
Call Anders what you like, make fun of his ideas all you want, but the ideas were present before he came about and only seem to be spreading even
faster as the reality of economic globalism begins to fail. What happens when people lose jobs and the money needed to survive, they lose it, they
lose everything, and at the moment Anders seems like a fluke, but in some sense this was the result of Globalism and Neo-liberalism, and his actions
represent the death knell for a totally integrated UN and EU. Most of these politician driven platforms depend upon a society ignorant of science and
facts and history, those post-modernist walls seem to have started to crumble, regardles of which side of them you maybe sitting upon.
On a final note, let's imagine for a moment you have sequestered a dozen cruise liners and filled them up with Immigrants from India, Africa, Asia
and you have decided to park them in the shores of the EU and the USA, what are the odds that those cultures being overrun would appreciate and love
multiculturalism then? To me it seems highly likely that if hundreds of millions of Immigrants showed up at either border they would be refused entry,
and let's say the reverse were so and we had jewish temples being built all over muslim countries next to sacred places, why does tolerance and
anti-racism seem to apply to those of European ancestry, if in the post-modern sense why do we even bother to tolerate muslim and other religions at
all? In many ways in islamic countries the infidels would be treated no differnet than how Anders treated "infidels" in his own society, he just has
a different belief system than a muslim, but to say they are all extremist for defending their identity seems to ignore the fact that the tolerance
facilitates it, even to absurd levels in the west. Religions exist in such a absurd manner today that when a nationalist comes along people forget
that the borders are all human creations as well, religions seem to imply they are not human creations and therefore not subject to ridicule or
The point being that states were partially designed to protect people from this kind of insanity in the rest of the world, Anders point was to show
that they can't even protect themselves let alone protect from being overrun by foreign forces, obviously the idea that everyone wants to protect
something has been abandoned and the idea that nothing seems worth protecting has taken hold, since we are all one, but that thinking ignores
microbiology and physics in a variety of ways and has led to post-modernist deconstructionist thinking that has fragmented reality for most rather
than integrated it at a fundamental scientific level.