It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The poor and middle class tend to buy their goods from China, do you really think it would be best to make those goods ``more`` expensive?
...the very incarnation of an international organization of integration in which Member States have agreed to relinquish sovereignty in order to strengthen the coherence and effectiveness of their actions.
...If there is one place on earth where new forms of global governance have been tested since the Second World War, it is in Europe. European integration is the most ambitious supranational governance experience ever undertaken. It is the story of interdependence desired, defined, and organized by the Member States. In no respect is the work complete—neither geographically nor in terms of depth (i.e., the powers conferred by the Member States to the E.U.), nor, obviously, in terms of identity....
Our challenge today is to establish a system of global governance that provides a better balance between leadership, effectiveness, and legitimacy on the one hand, and coherence on the other...
This report analyzes the gap between current international governance institutions, organizations and norms and the demands for global governance likely to be posed by long-term strategic challenges over the next 15 years. The report is the product of research and analysis by the NIC and EUISS following a series of international dialogues co-organized by the Atlantic Council, TPN, and other partner organizations in Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, New Delhi, Pretoria, Sao Paulo & Brasilia, Moscow, and Paris. ....
Do you happen to know how much these 50% receive from government considering child tax credit, earned income credit, etc?
You, as well as others, have raised a legit issue about the percentage who don't pay taxes.
For tax year 2009, approximately 26.5 million taxpayers received over $59 billion in EITC benefits.
it is estimated that every $1 paid out in the EITC generates $1.50 to $2.00 in local economic activity.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by crimvelvet
federal employees in my opinion dont generate wealth remember they get paid by tax revenue from the taxpayer
and when and if they ever pay taxes back doesnt even begin to amount to the wealth generation of non government workers.
Then you have absolutely no clue about anything related to economics, and should sit down and shut up, and try to learn from the people who understand the basics rather than spewing your ignorant, malinformed opinion as if it had value to anyone but yourself.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
yeah all those poor people and welfare moms sure create jobs dont they
and the only thing funding those people to begin with are the greatest evil this country has even known.
so do tell what happens to all those poor people when the money train stops?
you gonna pony up and give them free food free homes free education and free clothes?
lot of mouths to feed there.
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
it is estimated that every $1 paid out in the EITC generates $1.50 to $2.00 in local economic activity.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by crimvelvet
federal employees in my opinion dont generate wealth remember they get paid by tax revenue from the taxpayer
and when and if they ever pay taxes back doesnt even begin to amount to the wealth generation of non government workers.
Small businesses losing out to red tape
In an economic climate with few jobs and cutbacks on basic city services such as police protection and firefighting, you would think cities and states would be overjoyed when someone was willing to open up a new business, bringing with him jobs, economic vitality and tax revenues. You might think that, but you'd be wrong.
Instead, cities and states stifle new small businesses at every turn, burying them in mounds of paperwork; lengthy, expensive and arbitrary permitting processes; pointless educational requirements for occupations; or even just outright bans. Today, the Institute for Justice released a series of studies documenting government-imposed barriers to entrepreneurship in eight cities. In every city studied, overwhelming regulations destroyed or crippled would-be businesses at a time when they are most needed.
Time and again, these reports document how local bureaucrats believe they should dictate every aspect of a person's small business. They want to choose who can go into which business, where, what the business should look like, and what signs will be put in the windows. And if that means that businesses fail, or never open, or can operate only illegally, or waste all their money trying to get permits so they have nothing left for actual operations, that's just too bad. This attitude would be bad enough in prosperous times, but in a period of financial strain and high unemployment, it's almost suicidally foolish....
Remedial Economics 1a: Labor generates wealth. Whether it's a guy building a house, a public worker shuffling papers, or a plastic surgeon installing some new tits, these people are performing a service that has value. Wealth is thus generated.
You don't know anything about economics, as is plainly demonstrated in your posts. This is very relevant, since we are discussing, of all things, economics. if you don't know anything about a subject, you should, in fact, sit down, shut up, and try to learn from people who do have some grasp on it.
Originally posted by jam321
Found some info on 2009 for the Earned income.
For tax year 2009, approximately 26.5 million taxpayers received over $59 billion in EITC benefits.
it is estimated that every $1 paid out in the EITC generates $1.50 to $2.00 in local economic activity.
www.results.org...
And not only is the EITC program expensive, it is rife with fraud. In 1994, former Senator and Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen stated: "By the time we release the 1996 budget — early next year — we will develop measures to deny the Earned Income Tax Credit to illegal aliens. The IRS estimates that over 150,000 illegal aliens claimed the EITC this year for last year's taxes." A February 2002 IRS study reported that in the 1999 tax year approximately $9 billion or 30 percent of the 1999 tax year EITC should not have been paid. Fraud is so rampant in the EITC program that President Bush proposed in his fiscal year 2004 budget a $100,000 million appropriation for additional staff to police the EITC program.
The EITC should not be reformed or reduced, it should be eliminated. But it should not be eliminated because it is a refundable tax credit or because it is too expensive or because it has a high rate of fraud. It should be eliminated because it is a massive income redistribution scheme. Clinton's Secretary of Health and Human Services, Donna Shalala, described by The Washington Post as "one of the most successful government managers of modern times," maintained that the EITC "gives a tax refund to the working poor." But the EITC is not a tax refund, one does not have to be working to receive it, and neither does one have to be poor. And since a worker can get advance EITC payments included in his paycheck, the EITC is the equivalent of a pay increase, courtesy of hard-working taxpayers. But because it is now a major cornerstone of the welfare state, neither a reduction in the maximum EITC amount nor the complete elimination of the EITC program is on the Congressional agenda.
It is high time that the EITC program be exposed for the income redistribution program it really is. A better name for it would be UITP: the Unearned Income Transfer Payment. But until the members of Congress commit to the wholesale dismantling of the welfare state, the EITC, like the income tax itself, is here to stay.
April 14, 2004
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
yeah all those poor people and welfare moms sure create jobs dont they
Actually, yes they do. Donald Trump isn't the one keeping the local grocery store open. Sally Brown the night waitress who makes $4.25 an hour plus tips who has two kids and gets about $400 a month in foodstamps is the one keeping HappyMart afloat. Take some taxes off her paycheck,and she has more money to spend, thus stimulating the economy more.
really man. Again, remedial economics; it's the masses who make the economy move, not the elite. Increase the buying power of the lower and middle classes,and you're stimulating the economy. Increase the buying power of the top 1% and you're just sending money to the Caymans.
A Pew report estimated a family farm dollar generates $7 dollars in the local economy.