Originally posted by centurion1211
Uh, the laser component is most likely for advanced missile defense.
You know those "hypersonic carrier killer" missiles some here are always bragging that their country now has to deal with U.S. sea power
juggernaut.
Laser could conceivably track and shoot much faster than the conventional gun.
Which ones? The fast sea skimming ones? The proper defense from those is a well targeted fighter aircraft (those things that carriers have) with
good radar and AA missiles.
The intermediate-range anti-sea ballistic missiles that China is making? No defense for those.
People seriously underestimate the speed of ballistic missiles, especially when they are re-entering. They are conical, very very tough---as they
have to absorb intense heat from atmospheric re-entry, and they are going very very fast. Faster than you think. As in maybe going from 50,000 feet
to sea-level in 3 seconds.
A ballistic missile attack is like this: hmm, look at that bright light there, what is ...BOOM.
No, a laser that size is not going to work against a ballistic missile warhead in terminal re-entry.
The problem for China is to make such things which can hit a small moving target without nuclear weapons. How is the guidance going to happen? It is
very hard to look down because it is going so fast and it's so hot. Conceivably you could have some external link pointing back up which is connected
to a real-time sensor and surveillance system for targeting. An aircraft could be vulnerable, so maybe it would be a satellite---and returning
sufficiently good and calibrated targeting info isn't easy or cheap.
edit on 30-7-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-7-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason
given)
edit on 30-7-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-7-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason
given)
edit on 30-7-2011 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)