It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

RSOE site is saying unusal geological event in Cali

page: 2
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 02:52 PM
link   
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
 


Yeah, these ones were a bit more unexpected, but we just had some pretty decent ones a couple of weeks ago. Living in the desert long enough, you can actually feel when a thermal low is forming, and know that thunderstorms are going to form.




posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 04:20 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...

heres the latest video of another big plume coming from the same area.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   
I'm just gonna flag this thread and watch the events play out



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:25 PM
link   
What I don't understand is why did RSOE
not give a better understanding of the geological
even in their summary. Did I miss something?



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:39 PM
link   
It is clearly in the same spot and has a plum like shape and starts at a narrow spot and the spreads...clearly not the same as the weather clouds IMO.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by choppedbrisket
 


That is exactly what the report is. That is why there are no details about what is going on.....and the details given credit the information is coming from a video posted on YouTube.

So Dutch's video is being used as proof that Dutch's video is true.

That's not the way information, proof, and truth works. There would be thousands of people reporting something if something was really going on. So far, the only one who "sees" anything is Dutch. And he's not trained in the use or interpretation of what he is looking at, nor geology, vulcanology, meteorology, or anything else.

Accepting this site as proof is just wrong. And very, very dumb.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by crazydaisy
 


Because they are using a video on YouTube as their source. Not a proper observation about a real event.
That people are believing this is "real", need to rethink their definition of what "truth" is.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by ZombieJesus
 


I saw somewhere (I've been annoyed by this whole story like I used to be about people claiming clouds were "chemtrails") that no precipitation fell, but that there was a thunderstorm nonetheless.
What the radar shows would be virga. And most people don't know what that is.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 07:20 PM
link   
reply to post by crazydaisy
 

Because there was no geological event.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by stars15k
 


To be perfectly honest, I do not know how virga shows up on doppler, honestly never seen it before via radar(but I can point them out in real life though, lol), but with the entire area having a thermal low, conditions for virga are very ripe, along with rapid formation of alto cumulus which which is very common for this area this time of year.

On a side note, the topography of the adjacent areas do have enough ranges with altitude to be conducive to monsoonal storms.
edit on 26-7-2011 by ZombieJesus because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-7-2011 by ZombieJesus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   
As a local to this area concerning this thread, the i40 is a very traveled route, with Pisga crater being a mere 2.5mi from the road, why have there been zero reports from travelers on the 40? Especially considering that almost everyone has some form of videotaping ability.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 07:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZombieJesus
As a local to this area concerning this thread, the i40 is a very traveled route, with Pisga crater being a mere 2.5mi from the road, why have there been zero reports from travelers on the 40? Especially considering that almost everyone has some form of videotaping ability.


Excellent point and thank you.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 08:10 PM
link   
reply to post by crazydaisy
 

Hey Daisy, not sure if you know, but after clicking on the icon, this pops up:

And from here you can click 'description' for more details. I did not realize that until later either.

Peace,
spec
edit on 26-7-2011 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 08:33 PM
link   
wasn't that how it all started in "Dantes Peak"




posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 08:46 PM
link   
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
 

Yea, I've seen the description - I was speaking
of the Summary - actually none of what they
posted is very helpful in knowing what happened
and might possibly still be happening.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 08:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Highlander64
 


Dantes Peak was a movie that came out in 1997. IIRC, the action started off with people burning to death in hot springs in Washington, not California. By the way, nothing in Dantes Peak had to do with a certain someone mis interpreting weather data.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by crazydaisy
 

Because there was no geological event.


RSOE would disagree with you sir. hisz.rsoe.hu...

I've called 29 Palms emergency services. They said they would send someone out to investigate and call me back.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   
reply to post by OldCorp
 

We are talking about RSOE.
The "geological event" nonsense came from the youtube video. RSOE is explaining that.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by OldCorp
 

We are talking about RSOE.
The "geological event" nonsense came from the youtube video. RSOE is explaining that.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



Yes, I saw that. Now can you explain why RSOE is reporting an "unusual geologic event" if there was none? Surely they don't post advisories based on someone's Youtube video.

ETA: The USGS may be correct in stating there was no "volcanic eruption," but even a release of massive amounts of steam would be a significant event wouldn't it?
edit on 7/26/2011 by OldCorp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 10:14 PM
link   
So is it not false reporting if RSOE
puts up an Unusual Geological
Event Anyone seeing this would
certainly take it as an event. If it
isn't any kind of event at all they
should say so.
edit on 26-7-2011 by crazydaisy because: (no reason given)


Actually it shouldn't be there at all
unless it is something significant.
If nothing else they should revise
the report.
edit on 26-7-2011 by crazydaisy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join