posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 03:20 AM
great photos! always good to compare and think over..
well, as for comparison for the great pyramid in giza, in another tread of mine I showed a theory that has strong evidence that the giza plateau
looked completely different than today and the pyramid had a completely different function as assumed before as a giant water pump representing a
wonderful symbol of life and power of the ´godness of the pharao´.
The base of it is build ontop of about three before existing natural limestone hills and were used for the building! So the author shows that the
builders had many of the existing big stones already on the building site, NOT IMORTED from far..then they ROLLED DOWN the stones to build the base
of the pyramid. As a fact, the corner stones are clearly showing they were CUT out, not placed.
As for many other building/ constructing details are not looked at, but can be explained..
on Puma Punku, we must consider that the site looked other that today. Was there a stone quarry found near with the same types of stones?
( coordinates GE : 16°33'42.78"S 68°40'46.89"W )
the alien ´theory´ is not necessary, and is not a theory, but an excuse.
the cone shaped head of children was a common use, as for the adult.
facts first, then speculation.
edit on 26-7-2011 by anti72 because: (no reason given)