It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by KJV1611
Pangea is the continets before they split. You may be surprised to know there is a reference in the Bible to that. The great-grandsons of Noah lived in a time "when the earth split" as the 1611 KJV says it.
There are many mysteries in the Bible that many Christians want to ignore...such as the "lion faced men" that one of David's soldiers fought. He says they are of the Hittites, but those people were not unknown to the Israelites. So it seems to me there is something striking to the fact they were given such a description. It does not say they fought like lions, only that they looked like lions.
I am also a believer in the Bible, but I will accept that there are mysteries that we can search the meaning of. For me to see these picture of Tiotihuacan means that there was a people who lived there and should be respected for their contribution to history.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Harte
Yes, my bad. But the Asian source of Australians came directly out of Africa, and these were not the same group as went into Asia.
In the out of Africa theory, the ancestors of the Australoids, the Proto-Australoids are thought to have been the first branch off from the Proto-Capoids to migrate from Africa about 60,000 BCE, migrating along the now submerged continental shelf of the northern shore of the Indian Ocean and reaching Australia about 50,000 BCE.
SNIP
Skulls of peoples with Australoid morphologies have been found in the Americas, leading to speculation that peoples with phenotypical similarities to modern Australoids may have been the earliest occupants of the continent.[13][14][15] These have been termed by some Pre-Siberian American Aborigines. If this theory is correct, it would mean that some Proto-Australoids continued the Great Coastal Migration beyond Southeast Asia along the continental shelf north in East Asia and across the Bering land bridge, reaching the Americas about 52,000 BCE.
Originally posted by Gorman91
There have been no ancient European tool styles found in the Americas.
Yes, there have.
en.wikipedia.org...
In a 2008 study of relevant oceanographic data from the time-period in question, Kieran Westley and Justin Dix concluded that "it is clear from the paleoceanographic and paleo-environmental data that the LGM North Atlantic does not fit the descriptions provided by the proponents of the Solutrean Atlantic Hypothesis.
Originally posted by anti72
Originally posted by St Udio
.. so how did they do it?
the segment brought up the idea of the ancient stone cutters 'poured' some of the stone blocks...
or otherwise moulded/formed a malleable lump of stone that had properties like clay... and then became 'hard'
i think that all ideas that try to compare present technology to past efforts is akin to trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
the descent of human endeavorsedit on 28-7-2011 by St Udio because: (no reason given)
well, that would work maybe for poured limestone or similar, as in giza, but diorite..
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Egyptia
I just keep chipping away at it. The topic has always fascinated me.
The feedback is appreciated. I have a couple more related threads in the works.
I think you might like those as well.
Stay tuned.
Originally posted by Gorman91
DNA evidence is good for a lot of things, but when 20 million people die and the rest are raped and exiled, it's not so useful to determine whose the baby dady.edit on 28-7-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)edit on 28-7-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by lostinspace
No but awesome picture. Where was it taken?
wandering stars, for whom the blackness of darkness hath been reserved forever.
Originally posted by Thiaoouba Prophecy
reply to post by SLAYER69
What destroyed the site was the same cataclysm that destroyed the lost continent of Lemuria and Atlantis. According to Thiaoouba the two continents were originally created from the first cataclysm that struck the first inhabitants of Earth, a civilization killer asteroid, a mantle piercer. The two continents were made literally over night. But remained uninhabited for many tens of thousands of years until The Race of Humans came here to settle Earth and assimilate their utopian society with the fallen black and yellow race already living here for many hundreds of thousands of years. They created 3 pyramids with antigravity technology that they brought from their home planet Aremo X3. X3 denotes that this planet Earth is the 4th planet that was settled throughout time due to interior cooling of a planet over time. Similar to what happened to Mars. The blacks and yellows also settled Earth 1.3 million years ago from their home planet for this same reason but were wiped out for not catching an asteroid coming out of the sun. The city of Thiahuanaco was not where it is now but was a port city on the Pacific Ocean. The gaseous belts beneath Lemuria and Atlantis collapsed and swallowed both continents .The only two surviving pieces of the continents destroyed 15k years ago is Easter Island for Lemuria and the Canary Islands for Atlantis. The pyramids were used to control the weather through meditation as a harnessor of the magnetosphere and other cosmic forces to broadcast thoughts of the and other certain initiates within. As well as for interstellar communication and inter dimensional experiments. Read and become the one who understands that we were once greater than we are.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Gorman91
DNA evidence is good for a lot of things, but when 20 million people die and the rest are raped and exiled, it's not so useful to determine whose the baby dady.edit on 28-7-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)edit on 28-7-2011 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
MtDNA evidence is the largest part of the Solutrean Hypothesis. This evidence has since been shown to be spurious, with the finding of the x haplotype information from Siberia and the Caucasus.
IOW, haplotype x was hypothesized as being brought to the Americas by the Solutreans. Subsequently it was found that it most likely came over the Bering Strait with the other haplotypes.
It's a simple fact, the Solutrean Hypothesis depended in large part on the mtDNA evidence. You might not have agreed with this, but that was the stance of the original authors.
Harteedit on 7/28/2011 by Harte because: (no reason given)