It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Racist Conspiracy? Why are we taught that Black Africans never formed or ruled Ancient Egypt?

page: 24
27
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 04:48 AM
link   
Another picture from Egyptian family album " Pharaoh presents the afrocentrists with beautifully crafted necklace as a thanks for helping to build the pyramids"



Map showing king tuts dna to be of European origin



edit on 2-8-2011 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by LUXUS
 

Lux pal I see you will not stop , I wanted to post pictures too since yesterday but as I don't have them in my album I cant embed them as I wanted them big and bold for all to see and no links. However you forced my hand.

The links will have to do. First off is there not a multitiude of variety in skin color even among the black africans , some black people can be pitch black and some can be red skinned almost white.



Sudanese patients.



Colin Powel.

Moving on.


Notice the nubians carrying the gold rings. Their skin is is as light as the egyptians. Also notice their hair , your looking at redheaded and blond nubians. I'll admit it could be possible that they died thier hair with henna and whatnot but I'll leave that for my finale.



Compare their skin color to these egyptians. See the similarity.

Some more nubians.





Now the people of the ancient world were'nt as racist as people are now , no thanks to eurocentric racism caused to justify colonialism. Then nazi-ism , to justify germanic superiority. For this reason I will not be surprised to find intermingled blood in khemetians , especially the upper class.



A Khemetian man and his khemetian wife.


A khemetian man and his asian or caucasian wife and daughter.

i204.photobucket.com...
Here we have a Nilotic sudanese man , notice those straight tresses instead of the kinky knots. But , he's still black.



King tut may have had european blood , but what color do you see when you look at his skin.

compare his skin to this woman from South Africa.


Or this woman.




A depiction of RA. My he's looking very nubian.

And now for my final pic.

Hoosier's ghost , It's a white man!!! Rameses is that you?

As stated before with khemet's location and being that it was the leading civilization in its area , with ideal farming and a big river it's not surprising that egypt attracted so many foreign peoples. Also the culture and art was considered amazing everyone back then loved egypt. So the asians , and europeans came and mingled their blood and you'd find more than a handfull of interaciall children but this was mostly in the North or Lower Khemet. This was because Lower Khemet in the north is the crossroads between Africa and Asia , Greece was only a sail away , if you wanted a white woman. Middle khemet and Upper Khemet in the south had darker skin types.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
Another picture from Egyptian family album " Pharaoh presents the afrocentrists with beautifully crafted necklace as a thanks for helping to build the pyramids"



Map showing king tuts dna to be of European origin



edit on 2-8-2011 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)


thats not nubians...they are ethipoians/south sudanese....

the nubians do not have broad noses and big lips....they have thin lips...

get over yourself....the nubians are golden brown colour....the images you have are of foreign lands

peace



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 10:45 AM
link   
King Tut Was Caucasian - Suck It Up

Can't say I'm surprised.

Bone structure tells all.

Akhenaten's skull is distinctly Caucasoid.

He was Tutankhamen's father.

Any more questions?

Didn't think so.
edit on 8/2/2011 by 2012srb because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:02 AM
link   
Originally posted by De La Valletta

IF YOUR SO INTERESTED IN THE NEW KINGDOM....THEN WHY HAVENT YOU MENTIONED - AY & HOREMHEB (last kings of the 18th dynasty)...google their names....you will be very interested in their story..better yet NAME a foreign pharaoh...



I stand by my pyra , the consonants used would be p-r the r being a sun heiroglyph which would sound like ra or ray insted of a lion heiroglyph which would sound like ru. Anyways this is just silly semantics they all come down to mean the palace of the Shekem/pharoah.


the word pyra-mid is greek though!..pyra means flame in greek....stop using greek!...
pharaoh = per-aa....great house
nubian = nubt...precious metal



The hyksos never got into upper khemet which is in the south which was controlled by the Thebans so no , this is false


yes and my point is..the so-called hyksos of the 18th dynasty were NOT foreign....their ideology was....they were all related to the bloodline....ahmose..the first king of the new kingdom...WAS UPPER EGYPTIAN....they fought for a new ideology...

at best they were considered SEMI- asiatic....probably a mix between upper egyptians and the hittites

THEY COULD NOT BE PHARAOH OF KHEMET UNLESS THE MOTHER WAS FROM KHEMET...IT WAS A MAITRACHY



Wrong again I notice you spelling the hyksos as hykosis (and i'm confused) , hope you are speaking about the same people. Anyway the word hyksos or heqa khasewet as the khemetians called them means "foreign ruler" or "ruler from a foregn land" in khemetian. They were not native khemetians , they were not black. Google up hyksos and you will see in all khemetian depictians they were not black but asiatic , even their names indicated they had syrian backgrounds , possibly pheonecia.


no...the rulers of the 18th dynasty were from upper egypt...THE PRIESTS THEY REPRESENTED were asiatic..

THE ASIATIC SUN RELIGION WHICH THESE PEOPLE WERE PART OF...the covenance...started in helipolis...so truly even their ideoelgy was rooted in egypt.



I still stand by the true name of aegypt being khemet because it was , it was used to name the land of all egypt not just the nile delta , but what other name will you tell me it was i'd like to know , if it's mizraim that is it's asiatic name not it's native name.

edit on 1-8-2011 by De La Valletta because: (no reason given)


yea...khemet was the names of the nile valley and delta..., the word egypt relates to the term gypsies...forigners who came and stayed.....mizraim (arabs call it misr) , means "two lands" whch reffered to upper and lower egypt..probably a semetic word....


what i see is people constantly trying to relate to pharaoh...i tell you what..eveni fthe 18th dynasty were asiatics...in this new kingdom the word pharaoh was dropped...indicating that maybe they were not considered pharaoh...

peace
edit on 2-8-2011 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
King Tut Was Caucasian - Suck It Up

Can't say I'm surprised.

Bone structure tells all.

Akhenaten's skull is distinctly Caucasoid.

He was Tutankhamen's father.

Any more questions?

Didn't think so.
edit on 8/2/2011 by 2012srb because: (no reason given)


HOW?????

if they found 1% of white dna...you will ignore the other 99%.....propanda
akhenaten was black....tutankhatens mother was upper egyptian (buried in valley of kings..called a worker girl by egyptologists!)....

the cult of amun...capital in thebes...removed the sun worshippers...and then started the ramsees period
TUTANKH-ATEN BECAME TUTANKH-AMUN

in no way on gods earth could he be white...this is pure propaganda....IF HE WAS FOREIGN, THE THEBANS WOULD NOT OF PUT HIM ON THE THRONE IN THEBES.....

the pharaohs were known to protect theyr wives...if someone was to breed with a wife of his, the child could be king.....FOREIGN USURPERS WANTING EGYPT WEALTH....


peace
edit on 2-8-2011 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Can you read?

I said he was Caucasian, not white.

Pop it out of the nether regions.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:32 AM
link   
Definition for those who are clueless:

Caucasian



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
Definition for those who are clueless:

Caucasian



SORRY I DONT NEED AN IPHONE APP.


caucasion is white innit



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:42 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Caucasian encompasses Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Indians.

They have a very specific bone structure.

All you have to see is the skull to identify a Caucasoid.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Caucasian encompasses Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Indians.

They have a very specific bone structure.

All you have to see is the skull to identify a Caucasoid.


oh you mean euroasians....who spread after the crusades...!!

they were nubians...maybe nubians do have this caucasion gene....



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Nubia is nowhere in this picture.

You are grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to resuscitate a dying argument.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
Another picture from Egyptian family album " Pharaoh presents the afrocentrists with beautifully crafted necklace as a thanks for helping to build the pyramids"



Map showing king tuts dna to be of European origin



edit on 2-8-2011 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)


mitocondrial DNA, X or Y chromosome can only accurately tell you were your ancesters came from and your breeding history.

What are you trying to say? These snp mutations make groups excel at certain feats?

Let's get back to what biology says about natural selection. If humans are one of the weakest if not weakest animals in nature(pound for pound)and slowest.

Why did we survive as long as we did? We almost went extinct in africa. We human hominids were just 10,000-5,000 in number. The other hominids starved. But we didn't. Why? It wasn't because we where faster/stronger/quicker than them. Why didn't we not starve like they did?

We can't swim very well nor can we climb trees,have venom,horns,2 less legs(less mobile),smaller, and ridiculously long infant incubation(2/3 of a year) nor can we see well at night time or

Why did we survive and other better physically stronger,faster,quicker organisms went extinct(like the other hominids)?

If European humans are biologistically better equipped then why do they only make up 12% of the population of the world? Asian humans make up 60%. Africans humans make up 15%+.

Why? If Africans are a failed brand of hominid human why do they out number Europeans? These failures should just die out like all the other failures in nature right? But we don't. Why is that?

There are no superior humans. Superiority is a myth. We do get fat pretty easily. (1/7 of the world is overweight).



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Caucasian encompasses Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Indians.

They have a very specific bone structure.

All you have to see is the skull to identify a Caucasoid.


What are you arguing?

Skulls/bonestructure is evidence of human sub-species? ok I can buy that.

What about the asian "hobbit"? If that is a "race"/subspecies what is the "hobbit?"?

news.nationalgeographic.com...

They are still hominid buy not a sapien.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
King Tut Was Caucasian - Suck It Up

Can't say I'm surprised.

Bone structure tells all.

Akhenaten's skull is distinctly Caucasoid.

He was Tutankhamen's father.

Any more questions?

Didn't think so.
edit on 8/2/2011 by 2012srb because: (no reason given)


Having European ancestry =! being Caucasian.

Sorry stop using fallacy.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 01:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Nubia is nowhere in this picture.

You are grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to resuscitate a dying argument.


really....

NUBT, KARNACK, NEKHEN, ABYDOS, NAQQADA...IS IN NUBIAN LAND....

nubt means nubian....

the only dead argument is that they werent....clutching at straws lolololol....pot calling the kettle black....

pick up a book



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
 


Listen, if you don't know how we get little Africans, I'm not going to be the one to teach you.



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
For centuries, Eurocentric scholars have rejected the idea that Ancient Egypt was formed and ruled by Black Africans. Today we are commonly taught as a fact that Ancient Egyptian people had olive/brownish skin (like Queen Cleopatra, yet she was Greek...) and that their slaves were Black Africans. Also, it is almost ingrained in our brains that Black Africans have never really had the audacity to maintain a vast civilization due to the simple fact we see and are taught that all they did was dance around, make music and hardly bothered to form an organised society.

This video which will no doubt be extremely controversial to you as it explains how Black Africans were apparently denied the right to have formed and maintained Ancient Egypts due to western scholars wanting a "European Superior" view of history (like the Romans particularly) in the past.



Based on the evidence what do you think?

edit on 25-7-2011 by CasiusIgnoranze because: .


Because NONE of the egyptian hyroglyphs' represent BLACK people.

Get over it...


Regards.

P.S. At a 'push' BLACKS were used as "Slaves" to build 'stuff' (pyramids - under 'their' authority) for the RULING Egyptians.

edit on 2-8-2011 by Surreptitious because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by John_Rodger_Cornman

mitocondrial DNA, X or Y chromosome can only accurately tell you were your ancesters came from and your breeding history.

What are you trying to say? These snp mutations make groups excel at certain feats?

Let's get back to what biology says about natural selection. If humans are one of the weakest if not weakest animals in nature(pound for pound)and slowest.

Why did we survive as long as we did? We almost went extinct in africa. We human hominids were just 10,000-5,000 in number. The other hominids starved. But we didn't. Why? It wasn't because we where faster/stronger/quicker than them. Why didn't we not starve like they did?

We can't swim very well nor can we climb trees,have venom,horns,2 less legs(less mobile),smaller, and ridiculously long infant incubation(2/3 of a year) nor can we see well at night time or

Why did we survive and other better physically stronger,faster,quicker organisms went extinct(like the other hominids)?

If European humans are biologistically better equipped then why do they only make up 12% of the population of the world? Asian humans make up 60%. Africans humans make up 15%+.

Why? If Africans are a failed brand of hominid human why do they out number Europeans? These failures should just die out like all the other failures in nature right? But we don't. Why is that?

There are no superior humans. Superiority is a myth. We do get fat pretty easily. (1/7 of the world is overweight).



No don't know where your getting all that from, I'm simply telling you that Black Africans never built the pyramids and did not belong to the pharaonic blood line in general.

Tell me how is it that people in deep Africa cant even build a brick house yet you somehow think when they got into Egypt they decided to build a pyramid, align it to the stars and decided to start an new religion with a different writing system.....hmm, me thinks not



posted on Aug, 2 2011 @ 02:15 PM
link   
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
 


Clearly you have no clue what Caucasian means.

Get educated.

I posted a link above for the ignorant masses.



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join