Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
Originally posted by SevenStarrz
I don't think the point is to "silence", but to monitor, because now people fear both muslims, and far right extremists.
The way I see it is, you can't have *any* opinion, except one that is middle-of-the-road, without coming under suspicion, now:
You are contradicting yourself in a very clear manner, this is not bickering, it's just you making wild and inaccurate claims and me trying to have a
discussion you clearly are not willing to participate in. At least not in any serious fashion. (Very annoying).
You can go back and re-read some of my posts and see if you have any answers to my questions of your knowledge of right wing extremist groups and your
view of them being able to form someones mind in a way that made ABB in to what he is today, or you can educate me on mind control, a topic I am
interested in and have read a whole lot about, from MK-ULTRA via Jonestown up to Scientology.
But, please don't tell me I have only opinions, they are opinions backed up by facts, unlike yours.
No, no contradiction at all. I am saying that if you voice an opinion on either side that is extreme, you will start to come under suspicion. How is
that the same as "silencing"? Silencing implies a ban on opinion. Nobody is being banned. But, public opinion is being manipulated, I think.
I do have some knowledge of right-wing groups through reading up on them, and obviously, yes, some of them are very dangerous. As are Islamic
extremists. Does this change the fact that we should blindly accept the official story, without question, as to whether a particular crime or massacre
was manipulated? You make it sound like conjecture is a bad thing. It's not, it's healthy, and that's what this forum is for.
My source on mind control info? I am reading 'The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an UndetectableTotal Mind Controlled Slave', by Fritz
Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler.
Again, you are asking for proof, when I tell you, all there is on my behalf is conjecture. The "facts" you say you have, could easily have been
fabricated. Such as the manifesto. If we limit all discussions on ATS to ones where people produce "proof", there'd be about three threads.