Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by Aeons
Gosh, the further back you go the clearer cut he gets...in the same photo set. It is AMAZING!
I can agree to that, but where are you going with this?
Media is beginning to change the data on this story.
The transcripts of the calls changed just after they first came out. Anders photos are being edited to add Hitler like features. Badly, even.
When people come out at the beginning of some event and start screaming "false flag" and looking for little things in pictures, they are usually being
idiots. But if only they'd look again later, after the media connected secret service, government, and politically motivated editors and owners start
to get a handle on the information. A couple of days later, upto a month later. Then the photos DO change. The transcripts that accidentally leaked
"yours" instead of "another" get little edits.
The information changes, and inconvenient information that was mostly overlooked by most people gets removed, edited, framed, outright deleted.
Because most people aren't like me, and they don't notice the changes if they ever noticed the original information to begin with.
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, overwhelm them with so much they can't keep up anyways. Why worry about controlling the original
stream, when most people can't keep up with the firehose of information anyways.
So Breivik has gone from being clean cut to having 2 days of beard, and the suggestion of a Hitler mustache. From being shorn on the sides of his
head, to having shadowing added to suggest he has Hitler like hair.
That's not even subtle. It is utterly biased, and completely ridiculous.
No one gives you a complete story, and when they do accidentally give you something useful you may be assured that it will get revised. They never
tell the truth unless they do so by accident. Which is why you have to catch the information early, before those with control and agendas get their
fangs into it.
But mostly, it show that media lies. Rampantly. Unabashedly. Insultingly.
But even more, it shows that the media is controlled. Incompletely but still unabashedly.
Why did you need me to point this out? Did the point illustrated really pass you by? A set of pictures in this case was worth about 352
edit on 2011/9/7 by Aeons because: (no reason given)