posted on Aug, 1 2011 @ 04:38 AM
Originally posted by shug7272
reply to post by Solasis
I am not suggesting anything in my original post or since other than I noticed something interesting after initially being skeptical. I suppose people
can take my word for what I am saying or your word for what I am saying. It would seem silly to take your word for it when the first sentence you read
in this post tells you how I feel on the subject. Take it or leave it either way I couldn't care less.
edit on 24-7-2011 by shug7272 because:
added a word in thar
Not to get too off-topic here, but this kind of thing happens frequently on ATS, and it drives me up the wall.
Shug, you're legitimately claiming that you titled your thread "I laughed at those calling Oslo a false flag..... Then I noticed this." and then
turning around and saying that you're "not suggesting" that the attacks were false flags?
You must be, because you did it twice.
That is absurdity.
Let me reiterate what Solasis is saying -- you're incorrect, and you very, very much
are suggesting that this Oslo attacks are false flags. It
says so in the very title of your post.
Asking leading qustions, or selectively pointing out certain facts over others, those actions
by their very nature suggest something.
In this case, your questions and comments indicate that you are being led to believe that the Oslo attacks were false flags.
Again, the title of your post is:
"I laughed at those calling Oslo a false flag..... Then I noticed this."
What that title says, is this:
"I laughed at those calling Oslo a false flag..... Then I noticed this [which led me to believe otherwise].
There's no way around it.
And your suggestions otherwise indicate a gross and alarming misunderstanding of the most basic forms of logic.
edit on 8/1/2011 by Pseudonaut
because: (no reason given)