Anders Breivik and "hidden" Freemasons, page 15
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 17-4-2012 @ 06:05 AM by lifttheveil
At the time of the attacks Breivik was a member of the Lodge of St. Olaf at the Three Columns in Oslo[168] and had displayed photographs of himself in partial Masonic regalia on his Facebook profile.[169][170] In interviews after the attacks, his lodge stated they had only minimal contact with him, and that when made aware of Breivik's membership, Grand Master of the Norwegian Order of Freemasons, Ivar A. Skaar issued an edict immediately excluding him from the fraternity based upon the acts he carried out and the values that appear to have motivated them.[171][172] According to the Lodge records, Breivik took part in a total of four meetings between his initiation in February 2007 and his exclusion from the order – one each to receive the first, second and third degree, and one other meeting.[173] The Grand Master of the Norwegian Order of Freemasonry points out that while he was a member of the Order his actions show that Breivik is in no way a Mason.[173] His manifesto said that he took three degrees of Freemasonry and commended them as "keepers of cultural heritage" while also criticising it for being “not in any way political.”[174] The Norwegian Order of Freemasons said that during the four and a half years he was a member he only took part in four meetings and held no offices or functions within the Lodge.[175]


The above quote (taken from wikipedia) really has me thinking

I'm not a Mason but from what I know don't you have to work your way through the degrees? Surely he cannot join one day, attend the next for his second degree and then simply attend again for his third? Doesn't he have to do initiations, attend regularly etc. etc.?

Is this a clear lie from The Grand Master of the Norwegian Order of Freemasonry?


reply posted on 17-4-2012 @ 08:28 AM by detachedindividual
reply to post by OnTheLevel213



I think it's a mistake to focus on this.

What people should be focused on is the fact that he believes he is one part of a group of people who have been planning this for years.

Why should we give credence to what he says about the "Knights Templar"? Because he is confident, quiet, calm and rational, and he has admitted that the group is small (but powerful).

Those are not the behaviors of a liar and a mentally disturbed person. They exhibit confidence and certainty. There is honesty in what he is saying because a deranged person would not admit that the group was small, if it were a fantasy he would be claiming that there are hundreds or thousands of people who follow the same beliefs.

I do not believe he is exaggerating about the others he has been in communication with.

They didn't know about him, and they cannot find evidence of his "partners" around Europe. But at the same time they accept that he was extremely cautious and paranoid about being caught. He obviously knew how to cover his tracks and stay under the radar. Even when he was caught no one could quite believe that he was who he was. Why is it so hard to believe that he was in communication with others like him or that he was part of a "movement"?

Forget the Masons, this guy managed to do this without anyone suspecting, and when he was caught they couldn't believe it. Even people who knew him couldn't believe it.

He is not a mad man, he is not mentally ill. He is an extremist, and I believe it when he says there are others out there just like him.


reply posted on 17-4-2012 @ 10:31 AM by network dude
reply to post by detachedindividual



I think you are on the right track. The Templars are like the Illuminati in that they were disbanded long ago and have not surfaced in their original form since. So either they truly don't exist anymore, or they are a real deal secret society. The problem with claiming the name templar knights, is that there are multitudes of groups using that same name today. Many of them claiming to be from the original group. If this guy was really a part of a true secret society and he was willing to be a martyr for his cause, it does seem strange that he would start blabbing after he got caught. He would have known what was going to happen long before he started. It's things like that, that make me skeptical of his story. But as I said, I think you are going in the correct direction with this.
Pages: <<  12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fundamentalist Christianity: a mind control CULT?
  Posted 5 days ago with 36 member flags
A masons ring of the 32nd degree
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
Monarch programming - evidence or coincidence?
  Posted 4 days ago with 11 member flags
The Court System and Freemasonry.
  Posted 6 days ago with 10 member flags
Exposing Freemasons & 33 - Geometry,Astrology, or Devil Worship?
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
FACT: Buzz Aldrin claimed moon as a Scottish Rite \'Territory\'
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
I was a Mason and here\'s what I learned...
  Posted 3 days ago with 6 member flags