posted on Jul, 24 2011 @ 03:18 AM
I feel like I do not need disclosure to change anything I already know or "believe" to exist.. I'm open to the fact that anything is possible and
nothing is impossible..
To me though, "disclosure" in the mass way I think you mean.. definitely would want the government body to "go on record", in front of MSM, where they
gab over it for the next year, so that every person on Earth takes it in. That would be the widespread version I'd look for... if it were to come that
I like believing that Greer and Dr. Carol Rosin know what they are talking about, and don't stretch the truths about what they've experienced/learned
along the way. It could be quite possible that UFOs are "falsely" disclosed publicly, at first, casting them in whatever light the government may
choose. The team behind "Disclosure 2001" don't necessarily embark on "What will be" when disclosure happens.. but I paint the picture that the
president and puppets above will bring it to the public to show ET in any light they choose.
Whether they be completely peaceful or not, who knows what the USA would "Claim" they are ..!
And when they come out to MSM for that type, I expect a context including "we are in contact, we have been in contact, we understand one another and
they are intelligent, they are ________ and ___________..." who knows what they'd really throw into the sheep pen.
edit on 24-7-2011 by
ergastulum because: (no reason given)