It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rh negative blood types are much less in proportion of Asian populations (0.3%) than they are in White (15%).
Based on the serologic similarities Rh factor was later also used for antigens, and anti-Rh for antibodies, found in humans such as the previously described by Levine and Stetson. Although differences between these two sera were shown already in 1942 and clearly demonstrated in 1963, the already widely used term "Rh" was kept for the clinically described human antibodies which are different from the ones related to the Rhesus monkey. This real factor found in Rhesus macaque was classified in the Landsteiner-Wiener antigen system (antigen LW, antibody anti-LW) in honor to the discoverers.
"are those in the know aware that people are not buying Nibiru/brown dwarf stories and that some are kinda suspicious about comet Elenin and the fact that its small mass doesn't really explain why big earthquakes on Earth match its alignments with other solar system bodies?"
This whole business of Comet Elenin’s gravity causing earthquakes when it is aligned with the Earth and other planets is just daft. I imagine that every minute of the day Earth will be “aligned” with at least one other planet and one of the thousands of near Earth objects, many of which are bigger than the comet, you just have to pick a suitable set of objects.
what's the purpose of putting Rhesus macque in Contagion trailer?
Thanks for drawing my attention to that document, but surely you’re joking! I started to read it in detail but within a couple of paragraphs it was clear that I was wasting my time. The author makes up his own jargon (“georesonator”, “hyperresonator”) and cherry-picks the statistics he needs to make his theory work and ignores anything which doesn’t fit his theory. There are about 8000 known Near Earth Objects out there, about 500 of these are the same size or larger as Elenin’s nucleus. Some regularly come closer to Earth than this comet. Why single out one little comet as a cause of earthquakes and ignore all these other objects? The “European Royal Society” the author claims to be affiliated with does not exist and the document looks like a proper scientific paper but it isn’t (it hasn’t been peer-reviewed or published in any journal I know of). I took a look at the author’s own website and it is rather sad, full of grandiose historical and scientific claims (he says he has disproven special relativity and quantum mechanics) and allegations of harassment by freemasons, the “Illuminati”, “anglo-zionists” and NASA. Basically, this claim is worthless. Just because someone publishes something on the internet does not make it true!
I tend to doubt a doctor when he claims to be a member of the Bosnian royal family, to be a member of an apparently non-existent “European Royal Society”, picks the data which supports his theory and ignores that which does not, cannot find any scientist anywhere to agree to the slightest degree with his this theory, claims to be persecuted by Freemasons and zionists.
I remain unconvinced.
go and do his work, check all alignments between Earth and other planets, as well as Earth, other planets and comet Elenin, in past years, or perhaps even century, check how those alignments match strong earthquakes on Earth, then show us what percentage of such alignments doesn't match, confirming his 'cherry-picking' of facts.
...alignment can be used in two different ways for planets. The first way is typically what people first imagine when they hear the phrase planetary alignment, that is, if viewing the solar system from above (i.e., over the Sun's north pole), the planets form a straight line from the Sun outward. In this scenario as viewed from the Sun, the planet's would fall on top of one another on the sky (i.e., you would see the planet Mercury and all of the other planets would be hidden behind Mercury).
The second type of alignment is one in which the planets follow a straight line traced out on the sky. Since the bright planets lie in virtually the same plane (i.e., their orbital planes all lie within a few degrees of the Earth's orbital plane), they will always appear to follow a straight line on the sky if you extend the line far enough. Indeed, we call this "straight line" the ecliptic (see below), which is represented as a great circle on the sky with the Earth at the center of this circle.
First of all, it is impossible for all the planets to form a straight line out from the Sun (or viewed superimposed on each other in the sky) because each planetary orbit is tilted slightly (and sometimes not slight at all in the case of Pluto) with respect to the Earth's orbit (whose plane we trace out on the night sky as a line completely around the sky and is called the ecliptic). These zealots confuse the term planetary alignment with the more accurate words that should be used, planetary configuration or a loose grouping of the planets in the sky. Actually the event that occurred in 1983 was that the planets (all eight of them -- we are on the ninth, Earth) would be within 96° of each other in the sky -- not in a straight line as most people would misinterpret with the term alignment. To have all of the planets on the same side of the Sun and virtually all within the same quadrant (i.e., 90°) happens approximately once every 200 years -- rare as far as humans are concerned, but not rare as far as the solar system is concerned.
The last series of planetary configurations or perhaps more accurately called multiple planetary conjunctions occurred in the year 2000. Did the Earth tilt over? No. Did tidal forces trigger earthquakes? No. Did the polar ice caps melt? No. Were you even be able to see the conjunctions? Not really.
until then, you're doing exactly what he claims people trying to ridicule his theory do - repeating personal attacks while staying away from the subject of this matter - science. did you even bother to take a look at that paper?
attacks only the negative blood types, with the following results:
- 40% death
- 60% development of an immune system capable of protecting against all types of Viruses known to man. The virus also modifies the DNA of the infected, causing aging to be dramatically slowed down, Along with higher levels attained in intelligence.
Originally posted by mzungu
reply to post by jedi_hamster
i bet i can find alignments with near earth objects for any event in history, it doesn't mean the alignment caused those events.. the 'cherry picking' refers to his ignoring of scientific facts that do not support his model, not to mention the hundreds of other near earth objects in space which for some weird reason don't effect the earth.
You, and possibly many others are thinking wrong. Just because things are BIG does not mean they are "Heavy" in space.
attacks only the negative blood types, with the following results:
- 40% death
- 60% development of an immune system capable of protecting against all types of Viruses known to man. The virus also modifies the DNA of the infected, causing aging to be dramatically slowed down, Along with higher levels attained in intelligence.