Hard Evidence against moon landing

I just have a hard time believing that we landed on the moon over 30 years ago using computers with as much memory as a simple calculator and also doing so on our 1st try. Nasa scientists say part of the reason
we can't go to Mars right now is because of radiation, yet the moon
should have more of it due to it's closer proximity to the sun..Anyone
that believes that we went to the moon for a fact must also believe
that technology in general has not advanced one bit since the early 70's..
We supposedly went there 6 or 7 times in a row without failure
back then and now we are not able to? LOL. If we truely did go there
I guarentee all of you that we would have build some type of outpost
there, just like we've build space stations..

reply to post by William

---

Hello, even though some of the more silly hoax notions have been debunked, there are still a lot that can't be explained. One case in point is the flag waving when an astronaut passes by, the waving is not from the astronaut moving the pole to place it better. The pole/flag has long stabilized and is still untill an Astronaut passes by. Also there are many anomalies in the images that cannot be explained. Just because it sounds good and is from a so called unimpeachable source doesnt make it so.
Anyone that uses a little critical thinking and some serious research into the whole program, including the images, videos, details, etc, will doubt.
Oh one more thing, the russians also left laser reflectors on the moon, but we know they never landed a man, right.
Thanks for your time and good luck researching.

You are going to have to actually show the video, because in my extensive research I've not seen any video that fits that description. The classic example of "flag waving" video is taken when the flag pole is being twisted deeper into the regolith.

I strongly recommend reading www.clavius.org... for explanations of this and many other flawed claims about the Apollo program.

How much computing power do you think is needed to land on the Moon?



The distance from the Sun makes little difference. It's the time one stays out in space is the issue. It takes a lot longer to get to Mars then it does to the Moon. Radiation is also a problem for the upcoming Lunar missions, since they plan to stay for much longer periods then Apollo.



Huh? That doesn't make sense...



Look up "Apollo 13". Plus all the other missions had there glitches and problems. And the reason we can't go back right now is because of a lack of money.



Well that is the plan for the new Lunar missions.