So you expect me to find concrete Evidence linking Mossad and/or Israel to this well of course i don't have that ;; yet.
It would be amazing if i could find that kind of damning evidence.
You should read parts of his 1500 Page manifesto Before claiming i shouldn't be saying its Israel or Mossad.
So you didn't even read it all? You should. Makes a better opinion out of it, instead of just labelling the wrong things.
Under your logic, if i grabbed a gun and started running around killing people and saying that Israel is holy or damned, that would make me either a Mossad agent, or a sleeper agent for the Iranian Guard.
That's called delusion. Something quite often among psychotic people. Who would have guessed it, right?
I would beg you to look at the full spectrum. The US is coming down harder on Israel these days, forcing them not to attack Iran. Many European countries are abandoning Israel and other nations as well. Did you know Norway actually leaves in August? Not now? Did you know many other European nations are considering the same? Where's their attacks? Why would these hypothetical Zionist agents attack a backwash country with no political nor military influence in Libya? I could ask many questions like these that add mountains of doubt that this was anything special and reinforce the very clear fact that a single man, maybe with a friend, orchestrated the attack and did it on his own. Should I mention the fact that this attack did not move Norway to change its policies? I could also mention that too.
Google Video Link
I agree with the Ops view on this; but connecting the dots is very difficult when all we know is what the media allows us to know. When I read somewhere that the gunman had links to mossad, immediately I thought well this has something to do with Norway's support of Palestine and remember the news over a year ago about Norway promoting Palestine to diplomatic status
How incredibly diligent of you to forget to mention the other +2 billion people in the same exact situation. :/ No big deal. Norway's totally more important than China.
I did however say it was wrong to jump into conclusions with such a small stream of data. One thing is to have an opinion, like I have, or anyone that views this with logic, and another very different thing is to claim that anyone but the person pulling the trigger was responsible for this, at this point.
All major evidence suggest that he acted on his own, and there's proof that he did so, at a first glance. It's not like it's absurd to think it was him alone, it's not like it's impossible for him to pull it off alone. It's plausible and possibly real, and assuming that, a person with such displacement with reality and humanitarian moral basis, has no credibility to claim any sense into his actions.