The intentions of the US government to collapse the country in order to bring in "Global Governance" has been made VERY VERY plain to anyone who is
It looks like they want to make the Tea Party a scape goat to save their own hides. The date for the final collapse has actually now been set.
I am not kidding or spouting lies I have concrete data to back it up so I suggest you read it ATSers.
Just before the formation of the World Trade Organization in 1995:
David Rockefeller speaking on Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order
might be built, will not be open for too long — We are on the verge of a global transformation."
Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 199: "The New World Order] cannot happen
without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States
to change it's perceptions."
David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991 - "the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march
towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto
determination practiced in past centuries"
Strong on national sovereignty at the opening session of the 1992 Earth Summit...
"The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will
yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be
exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security."
-Maurice Strong at the 1992 Earth Summit. www.nationalcenter.org...
However everyone has ignored these warning signs, calling us tinfoil hat nuts. So they have gotten more bold.
The "IDEA" becomes solid
Strong served on the U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance. The Commission's final report, "Our Global Neighborhood"
detailed plans to achieve what is called "Global Governance."
Our Global Neighborhood
Report of the Commission on Global Governance
(ISBN 0-19-827998-1; Published by Oxford University Press, 1995)
A Summary Analysis
The Commission on Global Governance has released its recommendations in preparation for a World Conference on Global Governance, scheduled for 1998,
at which official world governance treaties are expected to be adopted for implementation by the year 2000. Among those recommendations are specific
proposals to expand the authority of the United Nations to provide:
* Global taxation;
* A standing UN army;
* An Economic Security Council;
* UN authority over the global commons;
* An end to the veto power of permanent members of the Security Council;
* A new parliamentary body of "civil society" representatives (NGOs);
* A new "Petitions Council";
* A new Court of Criminal Justice; (Accomplished in July, 1998 in Rome)
* Binding verdicts of the International Court of Justice;
* Expanded authority for the Secretary General.
...."Next to life, liberty is what people value most," the report says. It also says: "The impulse to possess turf is a
powerful one for all species; yet it is one that people must overcome." It also says: "global rules of custom constrain the freedom of
sovereign states," and "sensitivity over the relationship between international responsibility and national sovereignty [is a]
considerable obstacle to the leadership at the international level,"/ and "Although states are sovereign, they are not free
individually to do whatever they want." /.... sovereignty.net...
A year ago in The Global Journal this article appeared Of What Use is Global Governance?
written by Pascal Lamy, Director, World Trade Organization (WTO) He speaks of the European Union as sort of an intermediate stage.
...the very incarnation of an international organization of integration in which Member States have agreed to relinquish sovereignty in order to
strengthen the coherence and effectiveness of their actions.
...If there is one place on earth where new forms of global governance have been tested since the Second World War, it is in Europe. European
integration is the most ambitious supranational governance experience ever undertaken. It is the story of interdependence desired, defined, and
organized by the Member States. In no respect is the work complete—neither geographically nor in terms of depth (i.e., the powers conferred by the
Member States to the E.U.), nor, obviously, in terms of identity....
Our challenge today is to establish a system of global governance that provides a better balance between leadership, effectiveness, and legitimacy
on the one hand, and coherence on the other...
And lastly there is "Global Governance 2025"
& EU Intelligence Agencies
courtesy of Freedom of Information Act, at
The Atlantic Council has a summary HERE
This report analyzes the gap between current international governance institutions, organizations and norms and the demands for global governance
likely to be posed by long-term strategic challenges over the next 15 years. The report is the product of research and analysis by the NIC and EUISS
following a series of international dialogues co-organized by the Atlantic Council, TPN, and other partner organizations in Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, New
Delhi, Pretoria, Sao Paulo & Brasilia, Moscow, and Paris. ....
THAT is what our tax money and the blood of our Sons and Daughters is paying for around the global. The ushering in of "Global Governance"
TAX IMPORTS NOT WAGES!
Tax on imports = excise tax, see graph: