It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
- Norway police on the mass murderer of Utoeya Island.
"We have no more information than... what has been found on [his] own websites, which is that it goes towards the right and that it is, so to speak, Christian fundamentalist."
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Does that now make me a right wing christian sympathiser.
Originally posted by BrianC
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
I believe it to be a false flag but not due to anti-muslim bias but rather based upon recent reports by the DHS. They claim that the most likely candidate for terrorism is a white, middle-class, Christian male. Since the only main terrorist attacks we have seen as of late have come from Muslim's (most likely a false flag as well) I find this to be a pretty strange coincidence.
Originally posted by BrianC
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Oh of course, no one wants a race war and I believe things have been getting better for Muslim's every day following 9/11. At first there was hate and intolerance but most of those people have moved away from that hatred after the emotions regressed.
I completely disagree that this was caused because of being boxed into a stereotype or group. America has a lot of pull in other countries and therefore people take out there rage on America and Americans. This attack in Norway could very well have been orchestrated by the U.S. but not because of the U.S.
I wouldn't worry about anti-muslim thoughts on ATS, we have a few bad apples but most people here know 9/11 was an inside job
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that that is the whole point of your thread; to show how ignorant and irresponsible it is for people to whip up hatred against particular groups.
Originally posted by Libertygal
So when the Fort Hood Shooter attacked based on a clearly radical Muslim agenda, people cried out, "Do not paint all Muslims to be like him! Not all Muslims are radical!"
But when a right wing extremist does something bad, it is alright to paint all right wing people with the same brush?
Isn't that a little hypocrytical?
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by The Revenant
I understand.
It's just that.. well, reading it comes off as pretty hateful, almost as if to induce a reaction from them. Perhaps I shouldn't assume that, but still, painting any group of people with a broad brush is just generally a bad thing to do.
Besides, two wrongs don't make a right, but I really do understand your anger. I think any time we feel that someones' actions are inspired by hate, we all have that same anger. I just think it takes a rather insane person, regardless of their religion or politics, to do what radicals do. I think they are unstable, hence the slide into radicalism. Hope that makes some sense.
Perhaps you will find different words when you aren't so angry, that's all.