Is this book a mind controll to get people against the isrealties? Shouold it be banned?

Here is the link...

deoxy.org...

Tell me what you think?

WHen I was 15 a game designer of a game I was going to play said he got his game handle from the book...So of course I read it. It messed up my mind for a while. What do you think, mind controll?

Never heard of that book and i'm sure most people havent. In order for it to be mind control and be effective alot of people would have to read it I assume.

No book should be banned.
Even if people find the contents distastefull.
Like the other poster said, it would have to be read on-mass.
"If" we were gonig to start banning books for the control of people minds, we should start with the Koran and the Bible.

reply to post by kro32


Its interesting...take a read if you dare. But remember this, Moses came up with the
"ten commandments." So he couldnot have been under diabolical power.
Here is the author...
www.ihpusa.org...
Over 270,000 coppies have been sold.

Originally posted by SurrealEzen
reply to post by kro32

 

Its interesting...take a read if you dare. But remember this, Moses came up with the ten commandments. So he couldnot have been under diabolical power.
Here is the author...
www.ihpusa.org...
Over 270,000 coppies have been sold.

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

.. Sorry please continue.. This is just non-sense..

Originally posted by BrianDamage
No book should be banned.
Even if people find the contents distastefull.
Like the other poster said, it would have to be read on-mass.

270,000 aint that small a number!

Originally posted by TechVampyre

Originally posted by SurrealEzen
reply to post by kro32

 

Its interesting...take a read if you dare. But remember this, Moses came up with the ten commandments. So he couldnot have been under diabolical power.
Here is the author...
www.ihpusa.org...
Over 270,000 coppies have been sold.

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

.. Sorry please continue.. This is just non-sense..

Majic is VERY real!

I dont really think the israelites need any help gathering enemies, is what comes when you occupy someone elses country and try to push them to the sea.

With that said, I dont see how a book could do that, albeit such an "unknown" book.

Originally posted by SurrealEzen

Originally posted by TechVampyre

Originally posted by SurrealEzen
reply to post by kro32

 

Its interesting...take a read if you dare. But remember this, Moses came up with the ten commandments. So he couldnot have been under diabolical power.
Here is the author...
www.ihpusa.org...
Over 270,000 coppies have been sold.

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

.. Sorry please continue.. This is just non-sense..

Majic is VERY real!

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

This knowledge was known 10,000 years ago...

Originally posted by SurrealEzen

Originally posted by SurrealEzen

Originally posted by TechVampyre

Originally posted by SurrealEzen
reply to post by kro32

 

Its interesting...take a read if you dare. But remember this, Moses came up with the ten commandments. So he couldnot have been under diabolical power.
Here is the author...
www.ihpusa.org...
Over 270,000 coppies have been sold.

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

.. Sorry please continue.. This is just non-sense..

Majic is VERY real!

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

This knowledge was known 10,000 years ago...

edit on 22-7-2011 by SurrealEzen because: (no reason given)

That is no evidence that magick is real, just a load of fantasists dressing up and being silly.

reply to post by SurrealEzen


It's not "mind control." At least no more than any other book is. The reason it "messed you up for a while" is because it presented ideas to you that stood outside what you were used to. That's basically what philosophy does.

Is there any MAGUS on this thread?

Did any of you actually read the excerpt of the book?

reply to post by SurrealEzen


Hey Surreal

It's spelled ISRAELITES, and these persons are today quite extinct in the generic racial form they once possessed (i.e. in terms of what passes for an actual 'race' to-day).

Any physical blood descendants from the 'Benei Yisro'el have long merged racially with other (mainly gentile, non-Semitic groups (e.g. the Kurds in northern Iraq) and most have changed their religion to Islam or Christianity during the Middle Ages...

Modern day Yisro'elis are NOT directly related to the bloodlines of the Semitic benei Yisro'el ('Israelites') of old, the latter group more or less died out (with a few thousand survivors) by the end of the 2nd Jewish War against Rome (132-136 CE) and any known survivors were sold into slavery abroad where they mixed racially into the local populations over the following 2,000 years...

Genetic examination of persons to-day styling themselves 'Jews' shows very little consistency in blood haplotypes with the MAJOR exception of the concurrence of similar blood groups centered around the Turko-Ukranian Ashkenazi haplotype (c. from examining the similar blood groups commonly found around the area near present-day Kiev) , which are non-semitic haplotypes...

The recent discoveries of the genetic science professor Juan Comas (his book: The Race Question in Modern Science) was published by UNESCO, and concludes that there is no longer such a thing as a Jewish Race, ecchoed by Harry Shapiro, who wrote a book called The Jewish People, a Biological History who stated

'The wide range of genetic variation between various Jewish populations in their physical characteristics and the wide divergencies in their gene frequencies found in their blood groups render any 'unified classification' for these groups a Contradiction in Terms - for - although modern racial theory admits some degree of poly-morrphism or racial variation within a single racial group, it does NOT permot distinctly DIFFERENT groups, measured by its own criteria of 'race' to be identified as one and to do so would make the biological purposes of racial Classification futile....arbitrary and meaningless....and despite all the evidence, efforts [still] cconttinue to be made to somehow segregate 'Jews' as a racial entity...."

Most of the persons to-day who style themselves 'Jews' (even those who have deluded themselves into thinking themselves actual physsical 'blood-descendants from the ancient 'Judaeans', who were themselves of mixed stock and not a single 'race' even back in ancient times) are the very blood-mixed descendants of Turko-Ukrainians ('Ashkenazi-Khazars') who converted (as gentiles) to Rabinnic Judaeism from a kind of phallus-worship religion c. 680-980 CE in the area around present day Kiev ('Khazaria') hemmed in as they were between Byzantine 'Christians' in the west and 'Muslims' in the east - they chose a political solution to their religious situation ('the bava metzia' or 'middle gate') by choosing a 'religion' ( a specific form of mediaeval Rabinnic Judaiesm with which they had come into contact by interviewing Rebbes from Cordova) that was thought to be 'common to both' (i.e. the underlying religion to Islam and Christianity...) to act as a sort of middle man - and were quite successful as barterers in everything from wives to cattle to glass to wood to rugs to wheat to horses to jewlry - that is, before 1004 CE when the Muscovites destroyed their 'empire' and they fled westward into Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and, well, the Four Winds).

Racial Miscegenation into the local gentile populations where their ancestors found themselves is the main reason why French Jews look like the French and English Jews look like the English and Libyan Jews look like..well, Libyans.

Clear as mud ??

Originally posted by Sigismundus
reply to post by SurrealEzen


Hey Surreal

It's spelled ISRAELITES, and these persons are today quite extinct in the generic racial form they once possessed (i.e. in terms of what passes for an actual 'race' to-day).

Any physical blood descendants from the 'Benei Yisro'el have long merged racially with other (mainly gentile, non-Semitic groups (e.g. the Kurds in northern Iraq) and most have changed their religion to Islam or Christianity during the Middle Ages...

Modern day Yisro'elis are NOT directly related to the bloodlines of the Semitic benei Yisro'el ('Israelites') of old, the latter group more or less died out (with a few thousand survivors) by the end of the 2nd Jewish War against Rome (132-136 CE) and any known survivors were sold into slavery abroad where they mixed racially into the local populations over the following 2,000 years...

Genetic examination of persons to-day styling themselves 'Jews' shows very little consistency in blood haplotypes with the MAJOR exception of the concurrence of similar blood groups centered around the Turko-Ukranian Ashkenazi haplotype (c. from examining the similar blood groups commonly found around the area near present-day Kiev) , which are non-semitic haplotypes...

The recent discoveries of the genetic science professor Juan Comas (his book: The Race Question in Modern Science) was published by UNESCO, and concludes that there is no longer such a thing as a Jewish Race, ecchoed by Harry Shapiro, who wrote a book called The Jewish People, a Biological History who stated

'The wide range of genetic variation between various Jewish populations in their physical characteristics and the wide divergencies in their gene frequencies found in their blood groups render any 'unified classification' for these groups a Contradiction in Terms - for - although modern racial theory admits some degree of poly-morrphism or racial variation within a single racial group, it does NOT permot distinctly DIFFERENT groups, measured by its own criteria of 'race' to be identified as one and to do so would make the biological purposes of racial Classification futile....arbitrary and meaningless....and despite all the evidence, efforts [still] cconttinue to be made to somehow segregate 'Jews' as a racial entity...."

Most of the persons to-day who style themselves 'Jews' (even those who have deluded themselves into thinking themselves actual physsical 'blood-descendants from the ancient 'Judaeans', who were themselves of mixed stock and not a single 'race' even back in ancient times) are the very blood-mixed descendants of Turko-Ukrainians ('Ashkenazi-Khazars') who converted (as gentiles) to Rabinnic Judaeism from a kind of phallus-worship religion c. 680-980 CE in the area around present day Kiev ('Khazaria') hemmed in as they were between Byzantine 'Christians' in the west and 'Muslims' in the east - they chose a political solution to their religious situation ('the bava metzia' or 'middle gate') by choosing a 'religion' ( a specific form of mediaeval Rabinnic Judaiesm with which they had come into contact by interviewing Rebbes from Cordova) that was thought to be 'common to both' (i.e. the underlying religion to Islam and Christianity...) to act as a sort of middle man - and were quite successful as barterers in everything from wives to cattle to glass to wood to rugs to wheat to horses to jewlry - that is, before 1004 CE when the Muscovites destroyed their 'empire' and they fled westward into Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and, well, the Four Winds).

Racial Miscegenation into the local gentile populations where their ancestors found themselves is the main reason why French Jews look like the French and English Jews look like the English and Libyan Jews look like..well, Libyans.

Clear as mud ??

Thank you very much for the detailed info.
VERY enlightening!