posted on Jul, 20 2011 @ 09:57 AM
Freud made good points in his final, cataclysmic texts, 1 2 and 3 of "Moses and Monotheism". When this book was released, it contributed to Hitler
and the Thule Society's psychosis.
See, Hitler Shicklegruber, was actually a Sabbatean bastard child. That is the way of the crypto-talmud, to raise up self-hating ones like
Schicklegruber. Also his "final solution" chums Heidrich and Gobbles and also Mengele were also Jewish. Himmler was the Jesuit who relayed the
orders of the papacy (both black and white Popes) to these guys. These men were self hating Jews, who felt that the Germanic/Viennese bloodlines were
meant to stay in Europe, but that a forced-diaspora to Palestine, was the future for Eastern Judaists. So they waged such war and made such camps, as
to cause the 20th century diaspora to their intended land, which was seized by Balfour/Rothschild in the previous war. Note that Zionism was the only
other political party which was allowed to coexist with National Socialism.
The point of Freud's work, which triggered all this, was the the modern psychosis of "atonement" in the Judaists was way too strong. He surmised
that they had actually killed Moses long ago, and that this was the Genesis of their guilt. Personally, I do not think they killed Moses, but that
they did kill Joshua, the mason who built the first temple of Solomon, at Amarna.
Yes, in Cecil's movie, we see some great scenes. We see Joshua as a sort of Lieutenant of Moses, which I feel he was. And we see them building a
temple for Moses, though in the movie, the Hebrews (there is no such thing as Hebrews until Moses/Akhenaten leaves Amarna) are shown as slaves, in
fact, they were not slaves, just adherents to a new way.
So the movie, comes way after, the WW2 events that were triggered by Freud's work which explained that, 1: Moses was an Egyptian (circumcision is an
Egyptian priestly sex ritual) and this is shown by his insistence that his tribesmen in the Saudi desert, lined up to get chopped. Why would he
insist on them submitting to a painful Egyptian ritual?
In the film, we also see Moses when he goes to meet his ancestor, Jethro. Notice that these are tent dwellers, they are a sort of Bedouin gang.
These are the Hyksos and Sea People ancestors of Abraham. Notice that Abraham's lineage goes like ABE > ISAAC/ISHMAEL > JACOB > JOSEPH ...And so of
course, first Abe allows his wife Sarah to bunk with the Pharaoh. This is the origin of Isaac/Jacob/Esau fighting over the "birthright". Really,
what birthright could be meant here? Well obviously with the historical Yuya, who is the biblical Joseph, we can see that when the bible says Joseph
was given "The ring of Pharaoh", it is understood that he is Isaac's grandson, therefore he has royal blood. Notice that Yuya's daughter Tiye,
married Amenhotep III, whom I believe to be the biblical Solomon, and that produced Akhenaten, who was essentially Isaac's great great grandson.
So when Freud (a massively smart Vienna Jew) wrote that the rabbis of old, murdered Moses, and took his symbol, he was referring to the dark sun of
the Jesuits. Note that this priesthood takes Akhenaten's Aten and make it a black sun. This relates to events at Peor, after Moses and Joshua and
their followers left Amarna. At Peor, suddenly there is a split. No longer is it just Moses' Levite brothers who are the priests, no for suddenly
there is a man who rushes forward to slay a whore (Phineas) and he is then given a "priesthood to all eternity" according to the later bible
redactors. Tell me please: Why does this man rushing ahead and slaying a woman, result in his being granted a priesthood for all time? They already
had a priesthood according to Moses' way.
To understand the events at Peor, we need to understand the Pelasgian creatin myth, as explained by Robert Graves, Greek historian par excellence. He
says plainly "The Hebrews inherited the Pelasgian creation myth". So to explain the myth, essentially the female is the first power, and she flies
around the empty world. Then she takes the sky and rolls it between her hands like play-doh and whammo, she makes a snake (as we have all done with
play doh). Well this snake, couples with her, impregnates her, and then claims to be the master of creation. Well this upsets her, and she bashes
him in the head, and casts him down to the underworld. Understanding this myth, of the "woman who both creates and dooms the world" is essential to
understanding Eve, and Nefertiti, and Tiye, and of course, Meritaten (ultimate royal daughter of that time) who with her man, Gathelos, escaped Amarna
and made it to Ireland where her grave is. Scota, is her name. See "Kingdom of the Ark" by Lorraine Evans, page 276 shows where "Glenscota" is
located in Ireland, and "Scota" is the pseudonym for Meritaten, and she is the origin of the Scoti people (Irish), who populated "Scota"-land,
Nova (New) Scotia, etc.
So today, the Jesuits and the evil talmudists, both take Moses' symbol and run with it. Yes, if he shows up, I expect he will be extremely upset.
In fact, the people who claim to serve him, mock him daily with such service, because they are trying to free themselves from deep, deep psychological
guilt. Notice how they take the "Day of Atonement" which Moses gave them after events at Peor, and they have made it a mockery. They no longer
even understand what they need to atone for! They hate Moses like some evil cruel father, from their perspective.
Please note that this is true, as the head Orthodox Judaist, called "posek" whose name is Ovaida, and who is the interfaith-opposite-pole that
opposes the Ashkenaz Judaist Benny Nyetnahu, has said openly that:
"All the Eastern peasant Jews incarnated so as to die in the camps to process their karma."
...I am not kidding you, he actually said this and it is in print, though massively scrubbed from the web. Yes, he makes a powerful point which
speaks to the history above.
Make no mistake: Within this Moses-Church (and that includes the Vatican and papacy), there are two polar opposites. One has the good spirit, that
of the female, of the Amarna Princesses and their legacy. The other is male, priestly, and focused on pressing hate and cruelty onto women. The
first group sympathizes with Eve, the second group seeks obsessively to eradicate her from any positive imagery. Truly ghey.
Anyway, it's all about sex and/or the suppression of it. Cutting kids genitals I mean, whether it is Mohammed's crew who pricks the clitoris of the
girl child, or Isaac's crew that slashes the prick of the boy child; In both cases, they are practicing sexual rituals from long ago. It is funny to
me that Jesus never once mentioned the foreskin but Paul and his chums were all about it. Not once did Paul of the bible have the intelligence or
honesty to speak about Egypt as the genesis of these rituals. No, for Paul had a job to do, and his job was to ignore the history of Egypt and the