reply to post by smurfy
Why was there so many other discrepancies simply not dealt with and left.
The actual collapse of both towers.
The removal of the steel..not treated as a crime scene, even fire chiefs commented on that.
No search for incendiary or bomb material.
The tampering of video that was held as evidence.
The Naudet tape that was viewable the next day.
The same Naudet tape also tampered with on sound and vision
Two explosions recorded at WTC1 strike, (only one, the planehit obviously, heard on the Naudet tape)
Witnessess who say there were two explosions at time of airstrike, other say multiple explosions.
Agreed, smurfy - I definitely lean to the MIHOP opinion myself, although I allow there's POSSIBLY some way this isn't the case...I just can't see
Some of the other lingering questions I can't get over:
Why did Bush & co. effectively fight an official investigation for so long, and utterly under-fund it?
Why did a good number of the 9/11 commission members come out against the official story after the fact and state that those in the government &
agencies official obstructed and misled them?
Why did Bush, Cheney, and likely some others present what a court would readily conclude is an appearance of guilt in, but not limited to, refusing to
testify seperately and under oath?
How on earth did so much perfect (and silly) evidences of the 9/11 terrorists show up - reportedly unharmed passports (sometimes with duplicates?) at
the base of the towers (etc.), luggage - which they wouldn't need for their flights - containing incriminating evidence very luckily not making the
flights, and a profusion of other such 'lucky' coincidences?
Why did the supposed hijackers so often live very close to high-level intelligence institutions like Langley, and in some cases live with/otherwise
associate with direct/indirect government employees - who were somehow inept enough to uncover the plot?
Why, if the Pentagon had as many cameras on it as it does, and as many tapes were seized more or less IMMEDIATELY after the attack, is the only
footage ever released - what, 5 or 6 frames? - that doesn't really show much of ANYTHING? - - And why fight releasing it for so long? Just release
any and all tapes showing the attack from multiple angles and put the conspiracy to rest already...
What's up with Norman Mineta's testimony - not addressed in the 9/11 commission report - about
the exchange with Cheney in the Pentagon bunker?
Pentagon is supposedly one of the most heavily protected & defended buildings on the planet - and it couldn't shoot down the incoming plane, and we
couldn't have any planes there to do the job? This sounds more like an order NOT to shoot down the plane, honestly:
MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come
in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the
young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course
the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant. And --
MR. HAMILTON: The flight you're referring to is the --
MR. MINETA: The flight that came into the Pentagon.
I'm not trying to prove anything here, these are honest and sincere questions I have, and if the answers are out there and anyone can direct me to
them, I'd appreciate it as I haven't had lucky finding them myself in the mountains of (usually contested) information out there.
7/20/2011 by Praetorius because: (no reason given)