It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
I don't know if your degree down there is the same as ours, but I find the 17th degree amazing, just amazing. There's so much to work with in that degree. Of course, they're all amazing if you take the time to open your eyes (as I have no doubt you have, Senrak). I will be doing the largest part in the 29th this year... speaking of which, I'd better start studying for it !
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
Well, not to toot my own horn, but I will be Sieur de Coucy this year
Originally posted by senrak
Sorry. No suit of armor in the 32nd Degree of my jurisdiction.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
The Noachite ritual is basically a "Star Chamber" kangaroo court where an "enemy of masonry" is charged and sentenced (without representation.)
Held in a remote location on the evening of a full moon with no lights in the lodge other than moonlight with everyone wearing masks, the high commander is "unknown" and anonymous the charges against the individual are read out and a suitible punishment is decided upon and then authorised.
And it is listed as a "significant degree"
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The candidate then takes his grievances to the Vehmgericht, which was a real organization of vigilante judges who fought court corruption at the time (these tribunals did indeed meet in the forest under the moon). Since neither man is able to prove his case, the judges order a trial by ordeal, leaving the final decision to God. The Saxon wins the trial, and the Bishop is forced into exile in disgrace for his crime.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Actually my copy of "The Book" is a photocopy re-print from Kessinger Press that I bought last year when they did a one-off print of 1000 copies.
Can't see how it is you can claim this book is inaccurate as to the descriptions and meaning of the icons and symbols of the Scottish Rite - its not as if the symbols have change in 150 years or so, why would their meanings change?
Also I can't see how the heirachy would have changed in that time either, it is intristic to the rituals and various lodge types.
By the way as far as my favorite ritual, I'm quite interested in the 21st degree at the moment.
The Noachite ritual is basically a "Star Chamber" kangaroo court where an "enemy of masonry" is charged and sentenced (without representation.)
Held in a remote location on the evening of a full moon with no lights in the lodge other than moonlight with everyone wearing masks, the high commander is "unknown" and anonymous the charges against the individual are read out and a suitible punishment is decided upon and then authorised.
And it is listed as a "significant degree"
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Yes the 21st Degree is also known as "Prussian Knight", always was , still and is described as such in "The Book."
Further proof that Masonic Lite does not own a copy of it.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Gosh - you mean they changed the 23rd degree?
That would kind of mean they had to change the 22nd, 24th and 25th degrees as well.
If you only concern yourself with the literal components of a degree from the Areopagus then you clearly are not worthy of them, according to both Pike & McClenechan.
Why I'm sure you could substitute all the main characters with football players, replace the arc of covenant with the superbowl and the rain of fire from Adonai with a really nasty run of injuries and losses to the Denver Broncos, but then again it would still have to deliver the same moral lesson culminating in the 25th degree.
Apart from that it probably wouldn't be taken all that seriously, so why bother.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Gosh - you mean they changed the 23rd degree?
That would kind of mean they had to change the 22nd, 24th and 25th degrees as well.
If you only concern yourself with the literal components of a degree from the Areopagus then you clearly are not worthy of them, according to both Pike & McClenechan.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
The rituals could have been changed, but not in any way that would be allowed to interfere with the final teachings.
This would mean that as long as you can comprehend them from the old degrees then they are valid.
From my investigations they haven�t changed significantly in the higher degrees, although I believe it is common to have additional abstracted versions of the Blue Degrees in most lodges to �better educate those who cannot be.�
It is only your arrogance that allows you to persist in this manner, because you genuinely believe that only you can possibly comprehend these teachings�when you are ready, which you have been told by those who know better that you aren�t�yet�but one day�etc...
It is amazing that you genuinely believe that it is not possible for someone to be able to read this book � like you believe that it is written in some secret and mysterious language, it isn�t.
It is written in fairly simple English with lots of pictures and diagrams and arranged in a manner to make the teachings of the rite clear.
I�m under the impression it is only for the perusal of 32nd Degree Masons, it clearly sates in several places that you can be expelled from the Scottish Rite for letting it fall into the hands of people like myself.
Originally posted by MrNECROS
Once again the rituals contained in �The Book� are post-Albert Pike � McClenachan gives a personal thankyou to the man on page 8 for his assistance.
The supposition that what is now the 29th degree used to be the 30th could be partly correct,
To correct you on the contents of Magnum Opus,
Oh come now, you�re all of a sudden telling me that the Scotch Rite Illustrated is more significant than �The Book of Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite Freemasonry (1884)�
� just read the title and note the author was 33rd Degree Past Grand Master of Ceremonies Of The Supreme Council (This is written on the cover no less.)
What is it with your dyslexic like inability to comprehend precidence � you keep citing incidents from before this date as being reasons why the work is inaccurate?
This may be hard for you to come to terms with but the year 1855 is 29 years before 1884.
Brainwashing incidentally is used to make people do what you want them to by making them believe they want it for themselves, like charging a machine-gun nest or breaking into a private residence to vandalise a toilet.