It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
I have heard Bush called a Kennedy democrat - by Republicans - more than once for being strong on defense, but still a free spender. But until now, I've never seen obama called a Rockefeller - or any other kind of Republican. The idea is simply ludicrous. Sorry, but that's how I see this one.edit on 7/19/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Crapspackle
Originally posted by centurion1211
I have heard Bush called a Kennedy democrat - by Republicans - more than once for being strong on defense, but still a free spender. But until now, I've never seen obama called a Rockefeller - or any other kind of Republican. The idea is simply ludicrous. Sorry, but that's how I see this one.edit on 7/19/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
I have never heard Bush called a Kennedy Democrat - by anyone - and I find the idea simply ludicrous.
Kennedy supported, in today's lexicon, a George W. Bush-like "belligerent" approach to fighting the Cold War, and told CBS' Walter Cronkite it would be "a great mistake" to withdraw the American presence from Vietnam. In his 1961 inaugural speech, Kennedy said, "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty."
Kennedy believed in cutting taxes — deeply and dramatically. Before Kennedy's tax cuts, the top marginal tax rate stood at over 90 percent, and Kennedy — albeit after his assassination — got it reduced to 70 percent, a much greater percentage reduction than did Bush. Kennedy, in a 1962 speech before the Economic Club of New York said, "It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. The experience of a number of European countries and Japan have borne this out. This country's own experience with tax reduction in 1954 has borne this out. And the reason is that only full employment can balance the budget, and tax reduction can pave the way to that employment. The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy, which can bring a budget surplus."
Originally posted by Crapspackle
Originally posted by centurion1211
But until now, I've never seen obama called a Rockefeller - or any other kind of Republican. The idea is simply ludicrous.
I have never heard Bush called a Kennedy Democrat - by anyone - and I find the idea simply ludicrous.
Originally posted by Crapspackle
reply to post by centurion1211
Maybe you cannot read?
Originally posted by Crapspackle
Originally posted by centurion1211
But until now, I've never seen obama called a Rockefeller - or any other kind of Republican. The idea is simply ludicrous.
I have never heard Bush called a Kennedy Democrat - by anyone - and I find the idea simply ludicrous.
Was your google broken there for a bit or is it possible that like you had never heard what you claim you never heard, I actually never heard what I claim I never heard either.
You acknowledge it being written down before you and still call it simply ludicrous. I did the same.
Originally posted by centurion1211
I (alone?) can read just fine.
You - incorrectly as it turns out - claimed the idea of Kennedy and Bush having similar philosophies on defense and fiscal policy was "ludicrous".
I simply showed you how simple it was to find out that is - in fact - quite true.
Hope you enjoy your experience here at ATS and continue to both learn and contribute.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Those paying attention can't possibly be oblivious to the fact he has two very distinct faces. One for the perceived stupid masses and another behind the scenes when speaking to other Progressives. He is clearly screaming to them, don't worry about what I say in public, because I'm really one of you and not one of them. No telling which face is the real one and I suspect the real Obama is hidden under many layers of sheepskin. We only get a glimpse by looking at those who he surrounded himself with; His Czar's.
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by Crapspackle
And in my second post on this thread I clearly said I have heard people compare the two presidents.
You said you had never heard of it.
Then I posted proof that others have in fact said that.
Case closed.
Are you done derailing the thread yet (sorry Misoir)?
Originally posted by mugger
reply to post by CREAM
And Obama viewed himself and ran on the platform to end both wars, repeal Bush's tax cuts. end Gitmo, Is starting a 3rd war in Libya count for anything? Polarize a nation, raise our debt more than any other President has ever done in 1 or 2 years.
So youre saying that its the Rockefellers who are the Fabian Socialist Marxists who want to redistribute wealth? Then who are the leftists? Hillary wanted socialist healthcare too but Bama beat her to the draw. Is Hills a rockefeller Repub too
These pompous authorities, pedants and haughty, high-falutin'cowards are systematically poisoning the labour movement, clouding the consciousness of the proletariat and paralysing its will. It is only thanks to them that Toryism, Liberalism, the Church, the monarchy, the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie continue to survive and even suppose themselves to be firmly in the saddle. The Fabians, the ILPers and the conservative trade union bureaucrats today represent the most counterrevolutionary force in Great Britain, and possibly in the present stage of development, in the whole world. Overthrowing the Fabians means liberating the revolutionary energy of the British proletariat, winning the British stronghold of reaction for socialism, liberating India and Egypt, and giving a powerful impetus to the movement and development of the peoples of the East.
Originally posted by Crapspackle
Jesus Christ are people not allowed to have a different opinion than someone else here or just you?